|Posted: January 12, 2007, 12:26 pm - IP Logged|
Take a look at the performance of the following two skips ranges:
The 1,s Range
1, 10:19, 100:199
The 2,s Range
2, 20:29, 200:299
Both the ranges include 111 possible points for skips to end in. I intentionally left out 1000:1999 from the 1,s range and 2000:2999 from the 2,s range. This shows that a bias does exist even without including that vast stretch of skips from 1000 to 1999 games later. In every instance, hits in the 1,s range occured more often.
~Probability=Odds in Motion~