Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 7, 2016, 11:24 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

lottosync prediction jan 13 bc/49

Topic closed. 8 replies. Last post 10 years ago by vick.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar

Canada
Member #1888
July 20, 2003
184 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 11, 2007, 7:35 pm - IP Logged

here they are folks with the same sample size 400 9-13-14-16-17-18-30-40-42-45    good luck everyone!

    MillionsWanted's avatar - 24Qa6LT

    Norway
    Member #9517
    December 10, 2004
    1272 Posts
    Online
    Posted: January 11, 2007, 8:01 pm - IP Logged

    Good luck!

    How many samples did Guru originally recommend to use when predicting? 

      paul762's avatar - lion

      United Kingdom
      Member #3002
      December 11, 2003
      477 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: January 12, 2007, 5:31 am - IP Logged

      Good luck!

      How many samples did Guru originally recommend to use when predicting? 

      I think Guru initially used a 500 sample for his Belgian lotto, as a rule of thumb I used to use 490 sample if it was a 49 number game, 450 sample for the irish 45 number game etc. etc.

      However I have found that using 150 sample and doing a number of predictions and then using the best numbers from those predictions is working for me at the moment. 

      Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
        Avatar

        Canada
        Member #2859
        November 23, 2003
        463 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: January 12, 2007, 1:09 pm - IP Logged

        I think Guru initially used a 500 sample for his Belgian lotto, as a rule of thumb I used to use 490 sample if it was a 49 number game, 450 sample for the irish 45 number game etc. etc.

        However I have found that using 150 sample and doing a number of predictions and then using the best numbers from those predictions is working for me at the moment. 

        Paul so you run it through a few times and see which ones are the same most and use those? I may try that to.

          paul762's avatar - lion

          United Kingdom
          Member #3002
          December 11, 2003
          477 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: January 12, 2007, 3:12 pm - IP Logged

          Paul so you run it through a few times and see which ones are the same most and use those? I may try that to.

          Yes Vick, this is what I have been trying lately and it would have worked out on wednesday night on the irish lotto where LS1.6 selected the best two numbers to play which were 2 and 6 and they both came out, paying 60/1.

          Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
            Avatar

            Canada
            Member #2859
            November 23, 2003
            463 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: January 12, 2007, 3:32 pm - IP Logged

            Yes Vick, this is what I have been trying lately and it would have worked out on wednesday night on the irish lotto where LS1.6 selected the best two numbers to play which were 2 and 6 and they both came out, paying 60/1.

            i like 60 to 1 odds I Agree!.

            so your going to try this method this Sat. then?

              paul762's avatar - lion

              United Kingdom
              Member #3002
              December 11, 2003
              477 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: January 12, 2007, 6:55 pm - IP Logged

              i like 60 to 1 odds I Agree!.

              so your going to try this method this Sat. then?

              Oh for sure, my numbers are already done, they are 20 and 34.

               I will be placing the wager tomorrow morning. Big Grin 

              Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
                paul762's avatar - lion

                United Kingdom
                Member #3002
                December 11, 2003
                477 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: January 13, 2007, 3:52 pm - IP Logged

                Oh for sure, my numbers are already done, they are 20 and 34.

                 I will be placing the wager tomorrow morning. Big Grin 

                Ha-Ha you couldnt make this stuff up I tell ya!

                21 and 35 came out - DOH!

                Its worth noting however that I wouldnt have got number 21 anyway because LS1.6 doesnt predict numbers that came out in the previous draw perhaps thats why it gave me 20 instead of 21.

                Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
                  Avatar

                  Canada
                  Member #2859
                  November 23, 2003
                  463 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: January 13, 2007, 10:29 pm - IP Logged

                  Ha-Ha you couldnt make this stuff up I tell ya!

                  21 and 35 came out - DOH!

                  Its worth noting however that I wouldnt have got number 21 anyway because LS1.6 doesnt predict numbers that came out in the previous draw perhaps thats why it gave me 20 instead of 21.

                  True Paul, the 1 quirk with 1.6 is that it didn't pick repeaters , and the 1.7 problem is that it didn't pick numbers higher than 35 most of the time.

                   

                  Still you were 1off's on both. Good enough to try again