The preceding (letters?) represent a portion that were generated consecutively (in series) from 3 machines and are therefore genuinely random.
Don't ask me why I am using letters and not numbers -- I will answer that at a later time.
It is through sheer force of will alone that I can show you anything at all at this point -- but what you see above is a little of it.
A measure of absolute versatility is demonstrated in the example.
You are just going to have to perceive what you are able to on your own.
However, I should make you aware of this:
For any of you to see or "intuit" anything at all in this particular example you must start at the top and perceive it as you go down. You probably would have assumed that as a matter of course anyway, but I made mention of it only because absolute versatility is never limited to one direction.
I would also like to state quite mysteriously that the column on the extreme left "dominates" as far as this particular example is concerned (though if one were to know what I meant by that he or she might then mistakenly assume that all three were dominating equally).
Just ignore that last statement for now so that none of you have any more difficulty with the example than is necessary.
Actually, I think some of you will see something without any problem.
At this point in time I absolutely refuse to be more specific or to answer any questions concerning the example. Please respect that. And please appreciate the fact that I was able to do even this much for you so early.
What I intend to do is to create some kind of thorough "presentation" of everything that I know about the phenomenon (which unfortunately is not "everything" that there is to know about the phenomenon). My goaI will be to provide enough "evidence" (not necessarily proof -- but evidence) for the phenomenon's existence.
Because I am always very cramped for time, the completion of the presentation may be a very long way off (perhaps even as long as many months). I can't help that. And if I rush any of it all I will be accomplishing is to immediately reintroduce myself to that particular brand of frustration that I have been living with "for aeons" and quite frankly cannot endure any longer. Also, I will only wind up looking like the stereotypically delusional and unyielding "crackpot" and nothing else if I fail to convince.
It's a fact that it has always been a very frustrating process for me just to find a vocabulary facile enough to accomodate describing any of it.
Undoubtedly, I'll be forced to advance along the course of revealing its many attributes and dynamics very slowly and methodically because of my own "severely crippled understanding" of those things.
I know that I will need a significant amount of time before any presentation just to "get all my ducks in a row" -- if I can even find all of those ducks.
Also, there is an important story that I want to tell describing the circumstances in which I encountered the phenomenon. (No one has even asked me about that.)
OK then.
There it is.
Study the example, ignore it, or simply dismiss it out of hand.
Regards.
P.S.
It will be a chess-player who solves it.