Most Important StatisticPrev TopicNext Topic

• Thoth

  

  Findlay, Ohio
  United States
  Member #4,855
  May 28, 2004
  401 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 1:12 am

  ▲▼

  Those 7 variables seem to be the most commonly looked at.  Which one do you consider the absolute most important and why?

  Im sure that most people take them all into consideration before making their selections, but which one do you put above all others?

  Almost all observable events (i.e. sums, vtracs, pairs, repeats, digits, etc.) are decided upon by those factors, are there any other factors/statistics that you can think of?

  ~Probability=Odds in Motion~
• Rick G

  

  FEMA Region V Camp #21
  United States
  Member #520
  July 27, 2002
  5,699 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 5:49 am

  ▲▼

  Short term frequency, then current skips.

  Posted 4/6:  IL Pick 3 midday and evening until they hit:  555, 347 (str8).
  

  
  
• CARBOB

  

  COLUMBUS,GA.
  United States
  Member #4,924
  June 3, 2004
  6,719 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 7:58 am

  ▲▼
  In response to Rick G

  Quote: Originally posted by Rick G on Jun 7, 2007

  Short term frequency, then current skips.

  Ditto!!

  Thoth, it would be interesting to know what you think is the most important.
• Lkydeb*594

  

  100

  United States
  Member #38,061
  April 23, 2006
  15,525 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 9:15 am

  ▲▼

  I watch for way overdue pairs that become hot & pair them with cold numbers.
• WSN1

  

  Anywhere & Everywhere
  United States
  Member #10,713
  January 23, 2005
  290 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 12:33 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Rick G

  Quote: Originally posted by Rick G on Jun 7, 2007

  Short term frequency, then current skips.

  Ditto Again!!!
• Coin Toss

  

  Zeta Reticuli Star System
  United States
  Member #30,469
  January 17, 2006
  11,788 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 1:58 pm

  ▲▼

  (for games still using balls)

  The most important statictic is all the balls actually being in the bowl! The best system in the world, if there was such a thing, could't overcome that one.
  

  Sorry- couldn't resist.  (It's actually happened in live Keno).
  

  Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any. So many systems, so many theories, so few jackpot winners. 

  

  There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.
• emilyg

  

  50

  United States
  Member #14
  November 9, 2001
  31,614 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 7:42 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Coin Toss

  Quote: Originally posted by Coin Toss on Jun 7, 2007

  (for games still using balls)

  The most important statictic is all the balls actually being in the bowl! The best system in the world, if there was such a thing, could't overcome that one.
  

  Sorry- couldn't resist.  (It's actually happened in live Keno).
  

   LOL - you're soooo right.

                                
  
  
  
  
  
  

  love to nibble those micey feet.

   

                               
• Thoth

  

  Findlay, Ohio
  United States
  Member #4,855
  May 28, 2004
  401 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 10:18 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to CARBOB

  Quote: Originally posted by CARBOB on Jun 7, 2007

  Ditto!!

  Thoth, it would be interesting to know what you think is the most important.

  I voted out status, but I look at frequencies as well.

  ~Probability=Odds in Motion~
• guesser

  

  United States
  Member #41,382
  June 16, 2006
  1,969 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 7, 2007, 11:05 pm

  ▲▼

  You will laught at me - most do - but it's a combination of all of the above.

  From your list, you have to apply each of your choices to one, maybe 2 of the positions (5 WB = 5 positions).

  What I mean is, you cannot load up on just numbers that have not hit in forever (out frequency), same goes for hot/cold, and everything else.  You have to take each of those, and narrow each one down to a pool of numbers to choose from, and apply other theories to those.

  Problem is, trends change, so theories change.

  You can narrow your odds from 1 in 146 mill to 1 in 5,000, but to me that's not much of a difference, I can't play 5,000 games.

  Being off by one is the same as being off by 146 million. 

  This makes QP's look like a good option... 
• Shawn67

  

  Oklahoma
  United States
  Member #45,969
  September 1, 2006
  5,000 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 8, 2007, 11:50 am

  ▲▼

  I would have to agree with this statement !!

  GOOD LUCK EVERYONE