|Posted: March 16, 2008, 4:43 pm - IP Logged|
Last night's numbers drawn were
1 2 4 8 18
There was one winner, a QP. (Kind of surprising that 5 low numbers produced a solo QP jackpot, usually low numbers are split jackpots and very often player selected.)
Let's call the first number, 1, "base", or X.
This would give us:
X times 2 = 2
times 2 = 4
times 2 = 8
+ 10 = 18.
So X x's 2 X's 2 X's 2 + 10 = 1 2 4 8 18
Call it another from of "lotto math" as it's not exactly a real algebraic formula, and of course you have to get the first digit right to apply anything even close to something like this, but I wonder if this kind of approach is better than playing numbers or patterns.
As this is a 5/39 game, of course you would have to make some kind of rule about whan an answer goes over 39.
If only something like this showed any signs of consistency!
Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.
There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.