I'm changing my rule to 30%. I'm doing this because of the math. In a 10 day period, it'd be hard to show a win on 2.5 days which is 25% of the time in the 10 day period. So it's easier to use 30%. That would be 3 wins in a 10 day period.
That would cost a thousand bucks to play. I need only one digit in any position. Then all I'd have to do is put 00-99 in the other positions for a cost of 100 dollars.
Let me clear up some confusion.
For example only, let's say I'm given the number 3 in the first position. It could be any position, as long as you let me know ahead of time what that position is. Also, you could uses eve to eve or mid to mid, or eve to mid, doesen't matter, as long as it's consecutive plays equaling 10.
So, I take the number 3 in the first position. (Remember, that it can be in any position, and you have to tell me what position for that draw). I chose the first position with 3 as an example. Anyways, I take the 3 and pair it up with 00-99 in the second and 3rd positions.
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
etc...all the way to 99 in the second and 3rd positions. A total of 100 plays. If the number 3 shows in the first position, I win 500 at the store with a net income of 400 bucks.
That's one win out of 10. But I'm not looking to hit everyday of the 10 day or 10 plays period, just 30% of the total 10 consecutive plays.
Now here's where the 30% comes in. Or 3 days win out of 10 days total.
The cost of playing 10 days or 10 draws,(your choice as long as it's consecutive) is 1,000 bucks. If I win any 3 days (30%) during that 10 days, I would win 1,500 bucks. Minus the 1,000 cost, would net me 500 bucks. I could eventually parlay that money into tens of thousands a month.
I have a feeling no one is going to be able to do this because even if you could do this, and get lucky the first 10 days, the next 10 day period may prove to be unprofitable. The challenger would have to do this for 4 consecutive, 10 day periods, or 4 consecutive 10 draws(if you decide to use eve to mid...5 days). If you remember in the beginning I said that it would have to prove consistent.
You could get lucky the first 10 days, which may only prove to be a streak of good luck. I'd have to be sure that your system works consitently.
I'm not worried because like I said earlier, this is nearly impossible to do. And again, I'm not saying that no one has done it or won't be able in the future, just saying that if they could, they'd keep the system to themselves and wouldn't need the 1,000 dollar reward. They'd be making tens of thousands, or more every month. Actually the sky would be the limit.
So no matter how you look at this challenge, it won't surface here on the LP or anywhere on the net, for the reasons stated above. If you know a way out of this paradox, feel free to tell me what it is. Why would you need 1,000 dollars, if you can make 20 or 30 times that in one month with your system?
Good Luck !