Welcome Guest
You last visited December 10, 2016, 4:45 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Virginia: 5/1 - 5/31/2010

Topic closed. 1520 replies. Last post 7 years ago by BEMnVA.

 Page 44 of 102

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 4:44 pm - IP Logged

I dont know if this will help you but i found the 637 back on the 7th.....it seems most of my workouts have a winner but its a week or so early.......i use the p4 to catch it........ ex.............

p3  233 md winner and 878 eve.......233 had the 945 and 878 had the 673

yesterday was pretty obvious that the 67 was coming p4 3967   7515.............367 right in it....95 in both  for 9459/6/4        hope it helps a little

Jmill?

I have a suggestion for pick 4,ok?

Try this: all number from 0-9 are trying to average 4.5....which means if you were to average all the numbers played so far throughout the lotto history they constantly seek this balance as well as 4.5 for a numerical Skip..

Look back into the Virginia pick 4 history data base and run a skip evaluation for numbers 0-9....play three numbers that have on average 4.5 or below with the last digit being the longest out skip digit...

Here is just an example of what it "could" look like :

1st digit---> 1---skip---> 3

2nd digit---> 7---skip---> 2

3rd digit---> 5---skip---> 4

4th digit---> 9---longest skip---> 9

Example of Combinations Played---> 1759-1175-1179-7715-7759-5511-5577-9911-9977-9955-1177-1159

Cary, Nc
United States
Member #84641
January 1, 2010
1367 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 4:50 pm - IP Logged

MY SELECTIONS : FOR EVE 5/14/10

(48X) 480 481 482 488 484 485 483 487

(78X) 780 781 782 788 784 785 783 787

(17X) 170 171 172 178 174 175 173 177

(39X) 390 391 392 398 394 395,393,397

(30X) 300 301 302 308 304 305,303,307

The SLEEPERS:

10X,12X,20X,40X,12X,70X,36X,78X,89X,28X 26X,46X,67X,68X,22X,55X,66X,77X,00X,15X,50X

TheFlippers :

49, 97X, 29X, 39X

DOUBLE PAIRS :

44X, 99X, 11X,

Triple threats:

555,111,333, 888, 777,

45,59,90X,13X,56X,57X,59X,69X

GOOD LUCK TONIGHT EVERYONE

GOAL, WHAT IS YOUR SHORT TERM GOAL ? TO REACH PHIL IVEY STATUS!!!

(This is the best poker player in the world, Phil IVEY!!!)

Take's a POSITIVE vision to get to that  MILLION !

Always play where/when YOU have the advantage !!!!!

Cary, Nc
United States
Member #84641
January 1, 2010
1367 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 4:55 pm - IP Logged

Goal?

I keep tellin ya over and over again....your numbers look great....dang you seem like youve got this stuff figured out .. !

Good luck .. !!

THANKS CROW ! BUT you see how many pairs I post ! Man you are way more accurate than me . If I can get it down to about 15 Im lucky ! Man most of the stuff I do is straight research ! week to week month to month and year to year. Crow I even go way back to the beginning to narrow my number's down ! Its countless hours  on hours to get my number's. GOOD LUCK TO you TONIGHT ! YOUR KILLING them AS WELL BROTHER ! HEY DID YOU SEE THAT CRAPPING A...S REPEAT THAT CAME OUT IN NC TODAY ? Man oh man am I glad I dont put in any serious amount of time playing them !!!! lol,

GOAL, WHAT IS YOUR SHORT TERM GOAL ? TO REACH PHIL IVEY STATUS!!!

(This is the best poker player in the world, Phil IVEY!!!)

Take's a POSITIVE vision to get to that  MILLION !

Always play where/when YOU have the advantage !!!!!

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 4:57 pm - IP Logged

" QED Digits/Pairs " :

SS1.) --- 50% --- { (24x)-(27x)-(67x) }

SS2.) --- 35% --- { (30x)-(34x)-(35x) }

SS3.) --- 15% --- { (37x)-(51x)-(65x) }

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 5:09 pm - IP Logged

THANKS CROW ! BUT you see how many pairs I post ! Man you are way more accurate than me . If I can get it down to about 15 Im lucky ! Man most of the stuff I do is straight research ! week to week month to month and year to year. Crow I even go way back to the beginning to narrow my number's down ! Its countless hours  on hours to get my number's. GOOD LUCK TO you TONIGHT ! YOUR KILLING them AS WELL BROTHER ! HEY DID YOU SEE THAT CRAPPING A...S REPEAT THAT CAME OUT IN NC TODAY ? Man oh man am I glad I dont put in any serious amount of time playing them !!!! lol,

Goal,youve always seemed like a nice guy so I'm gonna be real with ya...ok?

I use to do extensive research into the past just like youre doing but I gave that up...ya know why? because I feel short term trends are "WAAAAAAAAY" more accurate...long over due combinations/pairs stay missing waaaaaaaaay too long so "WHY" play them? This is a major fault in most peoples thinking/reasoning that playing over due pairs/combinations will be successful....to the contrary they're not...

Ive proved time and time and time again that the QED algorithm is the most accurate way to play pairs and its based on short term trends and here is the "GOOD PART"....a lot of time those "OVER DUE" pairs fall within the parameters of the short term trends when it becomes thier turn to hit ......

Yeah its true about North Carolina...I dont play there anymore....there is "NOWAY" statistically possible to have that many repeats that close together like they have ...

Norfolk , Va
United States
Member #4541
May 2, 2004
25100 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 5:16 pm - IP Logged

Great JMill!!   Problem  is that I have'nt come up with a way to know just when it will happen and I'm watching for the same numbers to appear in a 2 day set of pick 4 numbers.  Maybe we can all figure it out because it isnt an every day occurrence .

268 368 tonight ????

057 067 267 357 168

Good Luck,

Blackie.

colonial heights
United States
Member #31712
February 2, 2006
12264 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 5:17 pm - IP Logged

Jmill?

I have a suggestion for pick 4,ok?

Try this: all number from 0-9 are trying to average 4.5....which means if you were to average all the numbers played so far throughout the lotto history they constantly seek this balance as well as 4.5 for a numerical Skip..

Look back into the Virginia pick 4 history data base and run a skip evaluation for numbers 0-9....play three numbers that have on average 4.5 or below with the last digit being the longest out skip digit...

Here is just an example of what it "could" look like :

1st digit---> 1---skip---> 3

2nd digit---> 7---skip---> 2

3rd digit---> 5---skip---> 4

4th digit---> 9---longest skip---> 9

Example of Combinations Played---> 1759-1175-1179-7715-7759-5511-5577-9911-9977-9955-1177-1159

thanks crow I will certainly givee it a try ...........I always try to backtest but that makes sense.....once again thanks and any input is always welcome

when you do it do it right the first time...........

colonial heights
United States
Member #31712
February 2, 2006
12264 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 5:22 pm - IP Logged

" QED Digits/Pairs " :

SS1.) --- 50% --- { (24x)-(27x)-(67x) }

SS2.) --- 35% --- { (30x)-(34x)-(35x) }

SS3.) --- 15% --- { (37x)-(51x)-(65x) }

crow I would really love to understand where you are getting and how you are getting your sets for the qed??if you dont mind explaining im all ears.................thanks

when you do it do it right the first time...........

colonial heights
United States
Member #31712
February 2, 2006
12264 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 5:25 pm - IP Logged

057 067 267 357 168

blacike im seeing 98 48 24 prs maybe even 68 65 and i have noticed a lot of sets   have been mirrored even the 673 lokk at previous draw for md.was 268=763

when you do it do it right the first time...........

Norfolk , Va
United States
Member #4541
May 2, 2004
25100 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 5:30 pm - IP Logged

I'm getting 9 or 5 in the number but not 100% sure.

Good Luck,

Blackie.

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 6:40 pm - IP Logged

I can give you some of the basics but the other stuff is lengthy binomial/hypergeometric distribution formulas that are a pain in the azz to write out because of the way Todds software is set up .

OK here goes: in Quantum Entanglement it has been discovered in the last several years that photons/electrons can share the same space at the same time...Ive applied this theory to digits and here is why.Digits 0-9 are constantly trying to seek thier own level much like water does however it takes multiple generations of draws to accomplish this....Digits that are unequal in number of times hit at 1000 draws are more equal at 10,000....so this tells me that each individual digit drawn is part of the equaling process and should fall within a 4.5 mean average....

Each digit shares its counterpart digit in the QED algorithm as part of the equation process...

I cannot let out all of the trade secrets of the QED because of flat out piracy/theft from onlookers who visit the lottery post forums and this comment isn't directed towards you in any way....

Best of luck to you Jmill .. !

Peace..!

VA
United States
Member #54828
August 31, 2007
37894 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 7:18 pm - IP Logged

Friday:

217, 247, 768, 743, 754, 807, 741, 357, 178, 750

176, 376, 872, 709, 751, 374, 897, 301, 123, 934

302, 931, 930, 358, 403, 483, 401, 806, 948, 064

480, 481, 485, 908, 618, 815, 204, 019, 218, 824

300, 303, 808, 331, 113, 114, 177, 933, 443, 484

444, 999

Good Luck and Happy Winning!

I have 376 on my list.

Midday winner was 673 which I actually played.

Good Luck tonight everyone.

I am a millionaire!

Cary, Nc
United States
Member #84641
January 1, 2010
1367 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 7:21 pm - IP Logged

Goal,youve always seemed like a nice guy so I'm gonna be real with ya...ok?

I use to do extensive research into the past just like youre doing but I gave that up...ya know why? because I feel short term trends are "WAAAAAAAAY" more accurate...long over due combinations/pairs stay missing waaaaaaaaay too long so "WHY" play them? This is a major fault in most peoples thinking/reasoning that playing over due pairs/combinations will be successful....to the contrary they're not...

Ive proved time and time and time again that the QED algorithm is the most accurate way to play pairs and its based on short term trends and here is the "GOOD PART"....a lot of time those "OVER DUE" pairs fall within the parameters of the short term trends when it becomes thier turn to hit ......

Yeah its true about North Carolina...I dont play there anymore....there is "NOWAY" statistically possible to have that many repeats that close together like they have ...

ya know why? because I feel short term trends are "WAAAAAAAAY" more accurate.

This is similiar to what Im doing Crow . I only back to do other kinds of research which helps me narrow down the #'s to play straight !

GOAL, WHAT IS YOUR SHORT TERM GOAL ? TO REACH PHIL IVEY STATUS!!!

(This is the best poker player in the world, Phil IVEY!!!)

Take's a POSITIVE vision to get to that  MILLION !

Always play where/when YOU have the advantage !!!!!

Norfolk , Va
United States
Member #4541
May 2, 2004
25100 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 7:46 pm - IP Logged

Congrats Increase!!!

Good Luck,

Blackie.

Chief Bottle Washer
New Jersey
United States
Member #1
May 31, 2000
23275 Posts
Online
 Posted: May 14, 2010, 8:34 pm - IP Logged

I can give you some of the basics but the other stuff is lengthy binomial/hypergeometric distribution formulas that are a pain in the azz to write out because of the way Todds software is set up .

OK here goes: in Quantum Entanglement it has been discovered in the last several years that photons/electrons can share the same space at the same time...Ive applied this theory to digits and here is why.Digits 0-9 are constantly trying to seek thier own level much like water does however it takes multiple generations of draws to accomplish this....Digits that are unequal in number of times hit at 1000 draws are more equal at 10,000....so this tells me that each individual digit drawn is part of the equaling process and should fall within a 4.5 mean average....

Each digit shares its counterpart digit in the QED algorithm as part of the equation process...

I cannot let out all of the trade secrets of the QED because of flat out piracy/theft from onlookers who visit the lottery post forums and this comment isn't directed towards you in any way....

Best of luck to you Jmill .. !

Peace..!

I can give you some of the basics but the other stuff is lengthy binomial/hypergeometric distribution formulas that are a pain in the azz to write out because of the way Todds software is set up .

It's frankly getting kind of annoying to keep reading negative posts about me, Lottery Post, and the way the site operates.  If you don't like it, you have the option of leaving.  In fact, if you don't like it, I'd prefer that you leave.  Nobody needs a wet blanket.

If, on the other hand, you like it here and simply have a few annoyances, then please write them to me privately and leave the garbage off the public forums.

Thanks so much.

Check the State Lottery Report Card