Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 16, 2017, 7:51 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

How much are you willing to wager on your system?

Topic closed. 4 replies. Last post 6 years ago by jimmy4164.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
Kentucky
United States
Member #32652
February 14, 2006
7340 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 16, 2010, 12:36 am - IP Logged

Since there has been much debate on system play vs quick picks and I mentioned given the choice when playing MM, I would choose playing the 2 if 5 of 56 number abbreviated wheel over playing 46 QPs because of the coverage, I was wondering how much system players are willing to risk on each drawing.

Pumpi and I are discussing pick-4 systems and I suggested one with a minimum play of $12.50. Many members participate in Maddog's challenges and I'm assuming some of them play their numbers in PB and MM. There is a 3 if 4 of 12 number abbreviated wheel with very nice coverage on LP that can be played for $12.

Pick-3, pick-4, pick-5, lotto, and any other type of online games system player's input is welcomed as well as QP players who may spend a like amount.

Oh and by the way, it's not about "how much would you spend buying a system".

    rcbbuckeye's avatar - Lottery-043.jpg
    Texas
    United States
    Member #55889
    October 23, 2007
    5738 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: August 16, 2010, 9:02 am - IP Logged

    As little as possible, LOL.

    A few years ago I stumbled onto BobP's Lotto Logix and I read in there about the beauty of a 2 line wheel. In other words, in a pick 6 game, if you play 12 numbers all different in 2 lines, and capture just 5 of the numbers, you are guaranteed to have at least 3 numbers on 1 line. Compare that to playing 9 numbers on a 3 line wheel, and you are spending an extra dollar, and playing 3 fewer numbers. Granted the coverage is a little better, but to me not enough to spend the extra buck. I think in the jackpot games, cost control is very important, because of how hard it is to hit anything.

    CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

    A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)


      United States
      Member #93947
      July 10, 2010
      2180 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: August 16, 2010, 11:59 am - IP Logged

      Since there has been much debate on system play vs quick picks and I mentioned given the choice when playing MM, I would choose playing the 2 if 5 of 56 number abbreviated wheel over playing 46 QPs because of the coverage, I was wondering how much system players are willing to risk on each drawing.

      Pumpi and I are discussing pick-4 systems and I suggested one with a minimum play of $12.50. Many members participate in Maddog's challenges and I'm assuming some of them play their numbers in PB and MM. There is a 3 if 4 of 12 number abbreviated wheel with very nice coverage on LP that can be played for $12.

      Pick-3, pick-4, pick-5, lotto, and any other type of online games system player's input is welcomed as well as QP players who may spend a like amount.

      Oh and by the way, it's not about "how much would you spend buying a system".

      My recommendation to poor people -- unemployed, on welfare, etc -- has always been:

      Limit your weekly Lottery spending to no more than what you can earn (or used to earn) in ½ Hour.

      For those with money left over at the end of the week, I up the amount to one(1) hour!

      This applies to either PPs or QPs.  Smiley

        Avatar
        Kentucky
        United States
        Member #32652
        February 14, 2006
        7340 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: August 16, 2010, 1:14 pm - IP Logged

        As little as possible, LOL.

        A few years ago I stumbled onto BobP's Lotto Logix and I read in there about the beauty of a 2 line wheel. In other words, in a pick 6 game, if you play 12 numbers all different in 2 lines, and capture just 5 of the numbers, you are guaranteed to have at least 3 numbers on 1 line. Compare that to playing 9 numbers on a 3 line wheel, and you are spending an extra dollar, and playing 3 fewer numbers. Granted the coverage is a little better, but to me not enough to spend the extra buck. I think in the jackpot games, cost control is very important, because of how hard it is to hit anything.

        Had I read BobP's opinions on wheels before playing a 3 if 5 of 15 number 13 combo abbreviated wheel, I'd known I'd probably still lose $3 even if I matched all 5 numbers which I did. It was less than a week later when I read it in Lotto Logix so I entered the same 15 numbers using the same order into five other 15 number abbreviated wheels to compare results. None of them showed a 5 number match but the 4 if 5 wheel preformed as expected and the 3 if 4 wheel and Lucky's 2 if 2 wheel also had 4 numbers matches.

        Because the system required me to use 15 numbers, I had a choice of 6 abbreviated wheels with playing costs of $13 and $15 for the 2 if 2s, $13 for the 3 if 5, $24 for the 3 if 4, $57 for the 3 if 3, $95 for the 4 if 5, or a 7th choice of a full wheel with a way over my head cost of $3003. Another option was playing just 3 lines but if only 3 numbers matched, I'd probably get one 2 number match at a loss too.

        For that particular drawing the results showed the minimum cost at $15 as the best option, but for overall play when the system consistently matched 3 numbers with an occasional 4 number match, 3 number match payoffs are needed to offset the cost waiting for the rare all 5 numbers match. When I found I could get almost the same results using 14 numbers, I settled on the 3 if 4 wheel costing $19.

        My game of choice was the 5/39 Ohio Rolling Cash 5 where a 2 number matches pays $1, 3 numbers pay $10, and 4 pays $300. I played the system every day for 6 weeks at a profit helped by two 4 number matches before I noticed the system was failing to consistently match 3 numbers numbers so I  took my small profit and ran.

        "Compare that to playing 9 numbers on a 3 line wheel, and you are spending an extra dollar, and playing 3 fewer numbers."

        By getting more coverage for $1 less it's the obvious choice providing the payoffs are offsetting  the cost of play until you get the 6 number match.


          United States
          Member #93947
          July 10, 2010
          2180 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: August 16, 2010, 1:51 pm - IP Logged

          Had I read BobP's opinions on wheels before playing a 3 if 5 of 15 number 13 combo abbreviated wheel, I'd known I'd probably still lose $3 even if I matched all 5 numbers which I did. It was less than a week later when I read it in Lotto Logix so I entered the same 15 numbers using the same order into five other 15 number abbreviated wheels to compare results. None of them showed a 5 number match but the 4 if 5 wheel preformed as expected and the 3 if 4 wheel and Lucky's 2 if 2 wheel also had 4 numbers matches.

          Because the system required me to use 15 numbers, I had a choice of 6 abbreviated wheels with playing costs of $13 and $15 for the 2 if 2s, $13 for the 3 if 5, $24 for the 3 if 4, $57 for the 3 if 3, $95 for the 4 if 5, or a 7th choice of a full wheel with a way over my head cost of $3003. Another option was playing just 3 lines but if only 3 numbers matched, I'd probably get one 2 number match at a loss too.

          For that particular drawing the results showed the minimum cost at $15 as the best option, but for overall play when the system consistently matched 3 numbers with an occasional 4 number match, 3 number match payoffs are needed to offset the cost waiting for the rare all 5 numbers match. When I found I could get almost the same results using 14 numbers, I settled on the 3 if 4 wheel costing $19.

          My game of choice was the 5/39 Ohio Rolling Cash 5 where a 2 number matches pays $1, 3 numbers pay $10, and 4 pays $300. I played the system every day for 6 weeks at a profit helped by two 4 number matches before I noticed the system was failing to consistently match 3 numbers numbers so I  took my small profit and ran.

          "Compare that to playing 9 numbers on a 3 line wheel, and you are spending an extra dollar, and playing 3 fewer numbers."

          By getting more coverage for $1 less it's the obvious choice providing the payoffs are offsetting  the cost of play until you get the 6 number match.

          Stack47,

          "My game of choice was the 5/39 Ohio Rolling Cash 5 where a 2 number matches pays $1, 3 numbers pay $10, and 4 pays $300. I played the system every day for 6 weeks at a profit helped by two 4 number matches before I noticed the system was failing to consistently match 3 numbers numbers  so I  took my small profit and ran."

          Now, this is an intelligent approach to playing the lottery!  Smile

          (Minimizing losses while you wait and hope for the Big Win!)