Welcome Guest
You last visited April 27, 2017, 6:23 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# New Jersey: 1/1 - 1/31/2011

Topic closed. 643 replies. Last post 6 years ago by Jack-C.

 Page 23 of 43
Beautiful Florida
United States
Member #5709
July 18, 2004
20529 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 9:00 pm - IP Logged

Midday  1/17:

561 - 571 - 582

" You can not control the Wind, but you can direct the Sail "

San Diego, CA
United States
Member #61467
May 24, 2008
28146 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:03 pm - IP Logged

01/17

Pick-A-Pair

Midday
03 06 08 13 16 18 24 25 27 29 36 38 45 47 49 59 68 79
Due Digit: 8

Evening
01 04 05 14 15 17 26 28 29 36 38 39 45 47 57 68 69 89
Due Digit: 7

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:17 pm - IP Logged

Just remarkable how the 26 is sooooo consistent, while others like 24 are in outer space! The 26 also likes to repeat its combo too. Very interesting. This one repeats from 1/2/11.

This is proof of Crow's methodology of utilizing those digits that are the UCD! The only explanation for stats such as the 26 are the draws being skewed by extra test draws.

Good Luck to All!

Alan

Its still a mystery just why those Universal Constant Digits behave as they do although for a limited amount of time until other digits take their place.

I bet Ive went though various state lotto bases a 1000 times looking for markers as a means to complete the QED pairs.

Here is what Ive discovered: the digits 0-3-6 accompany the UCD's the most amount of times and hold the "HIGHEST" value from a statistical stand point.

Why is this so?

I haven't correlated a theory yet that explains this phenomena however on a side note I feel it has something to do with how things interact with each other in a parallel universe as akin to the "Double Slit' particle/wave experiment.

New Jersey
United States
Member #99032
October 18, 2010
1439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:20 pm - IP Logged

Just remarkable how the 26 is sooooo consistent, while others like 24 are in outer space! The 26 also likes to repeat its combo too. Very interesting. This one repeats from 1/2/11.

This is proof of Crow's methodology of utilizing those digits that are the UCD! The only explanation for stats such as the 26 are the draws being skewed by extra test draws.

Good Luck to All!

Alan

I so agree.  I've been trying to make a system with that type of ideology.  Here's what I came up with for tonight.  I really didn't know what to put with the "constants", so I used a few numbers that hadn't been out recently.  I wish I placed the bet, but I didn't really want to play too many numbers.  I'm gonna keep playing around with this.  I think that the "key" may be to find what's happeneing now, and guess on the rest.

Contsants
3-6-0
Due
4-8-9
483 493 893
486 496 896
480 490 890

304 364 604
308 368 608
309 369 609

New Jersey
United States
Member #99032
October 18, 2010
1439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:23 pm - IP Logged

Crow, have you been able to find working UCDs in states where they use RNGs?  Just wondering, because it'd be interesting if it only happened in Machine states - that'd be interesting.

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:34 pm - IP Logged

Crow, have you been able to find working UCDs in states where they use RNGs?  Just wondering, because it'd be interesting if it only happened in Machine states - that'd be interesting.

I'm not sure I understand your question.

Think of UCD's as short term digits that stay constant for a limited number of draws...it is kinda tricky to identify them.

When you have something that remains constant over the short term its just way easier to make an accurate prediction.

I can pull UCD's out of a computer generated RNG as well.

The "OTHER" side of the equation is the lesser UCD's that make up the QED pairs...statistically it looks more and more like the digits 0-3-6

This is one of the reasons why that due digit/sums..etc. doesn't really apply from a statistical stand point.

United States
Member #27050
November 26, 2005
40273 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:36 pm - IP Logged

1/16/2011 - Evening Results - 064 and  6434

Congratulations to all winners

United States
Member #27050
November 26, 2005
40273 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:37 pm - IP Logged

1/16/11 M/E

012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 056, 057, 058, 059, 067, 068, 069, 078, 079, 089, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 145

WTG Wheeler 046 boxed....!!!

United States
Member #27050
November 26, 2005
40273 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:39 pm - IP Logged

Evening draw for 16-Jan-2011

 Weekly pairs: 11-14-56-57-67 3 6 2 New Jersey Midday 3 6 2 - 3 6 5 - 3 6 9 - 3 9 2 - 3 9 5 - 3 9 9 - 3 3 2 - 3 3 5 - 3 3 9 6 6 2 - 6 6 5 - 6 6 9 - 6 9 2 - 6 9 5 - 6 9 9 - 6 3 2 - 6 3 5 - 6 3 9 0 6 2 - 0 6 5 - 0 6 9 - 0 9 2 - 0 9 5 - 0 9 9 - 0 3 2 - 0 3 5 - 0 3 9 1 0 3 New Jersey Evening 1 0 3 - 1 0 6 - 1 0 0 - 1 3 3 - 1 3 6 - 1 3 0 - 1 7 3 - 1 7 6 - 1 7 0 4 0 3 - 4 0 6 - 4 0 0 - 4 3 3 - 4 3 6 - 4 3 0 - 4 7 3 - 4 7 6 - 4 7 0 8 0 3 - 8 0 6 - 8 0 0 - 8 3 3 - 8 3 6 - 8 3 0 - 8 7 3 - 8 7 6 - 8 7 0

 M E E 6 1 2 6 0 9 6 4 5 0 3 3 4 3 8 3 3 6 9 8 7 5 6 7 2 1 7

 7 9 3 0 4 1

 3 8 5 4 9 6 5 0 7 6 1 8 7 2 9 8 3 0 9 4 1 0 5 2 1 6 3 2 7 4

 2 8 5 3 9 6 4 0 7 5 1 8 6 2 9 7 3 0 8 4 1 9 5 2 0 6 3 1 7 4

Evening Chilles - 406     Short box - 04 pair    Evening TTT 640 w/key digit 6.

New Jersey
United States
Member #99032
October 18, 2010
1439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:45 pm - IP Logged

I'm not sure I understand your question.

Think of UCD's as short term digits that stay constant for a limited number of draws...it is kinda tricky to identify them.

When you have something that remains constant over the short term its just way easier to make an accurate prediction.

I can pull UCD's out of a computer generated RNG as well.

The "OTHER" side of the equation is the lesser UCD's that make up the QED pairs...statistically it looks more and more like the digits 0-3-6

This is one of the reasons why that due digit/sums..etc. doesn't really apply from a statistical stand point.

Ok, I gotcha.  That's pretty much what I was trying to apply to my bets.  My question was whether or not those constants are as accurate in states that use RNGs vs states that use Number Draw methods.  It's more of a curiosity question - I was assuming that you have looked at some of those states already.

So yeah, you answered you got the question.  I don't think that there would be a way to very accurately predict anything except a few constants - I'd assume you have to guess on them.  I did notice, though, that 0's appear to show up with a lot of my pairs.  I was assuming it was coincidence.

United States
Member #69530
January 11, 2009
7803 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:54 pm - IP Logged

Ok, I gotcha.  That's pretty much what I was trying to apply to my bets.  My question was whether or not those constants are as accurate in states that use RNGs vs states that use Number Draw methods.  It's more of a curiosity question - I was assuming that you have looked at some of those states already.

So yeah, you answered you got the question.  I don't think that there would be a way to very accurately predict anything except a few constants - I'd assume you have to guess on them.  I did notice, though, that 0's appear to show up with a lot of my pairs.  I was assuming it was coincidence.

Ok check this out : These are the UCD's for tomorrows mid-day draw.!!

UCD's ---> 1-4-6

There is a very high likelihood that 1/3 of these digits are going to hit,ok?

We already know the the Lesser known UCD's that make up the QED pairs are 0-3-6

This is the fundamental basics behind reduction modeling.

New Jersey
United States
Member #99032
October 18, 2010
1439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 10:56 pm - IP Logged

Congrats Calabs and Wheeler!  And pass some of that luck my way!!!  lol.

New Jersey
United States
Member #99032
October 18, 2010
1439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 16, 2011, 11:04 pm - IP Logged

Ok check this out : These are the UCD's for tomorrows mid-day draw.!!

UCD's ---> 1-4-6

There is a very high likelihood that 1/3 of these digits are going to hit,ok?

We already know the the Lesser known UCD's that make up the QED pairs are 0-3-6

This is the fundamental basics behind reduction modeling.

Hmmm.  Ok.  On my Pen/Paper I had 0-3-6 as my constants for this Evening draw... Definietly makes me think you're on to something.  I was "guessing" on what my other numbers would have been.  I happened to guess right (the 4, which I had as 4-8-9)  I didn't bet on this.

I'm gonna keep takeing a look at this, and if I was, I think I would have come up with 6-4-3 as constants, 1-8-9 as my others.

I think I see how you got 1-4-6.  The 6 has been popping out, and the 4 and 1 are potential candidates to do the same.

United States
Member #27050
November 26, 2005
40273 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 17, 2011, 12:23 am - IP Logged

Congrats Calabs and Wheeler!  And pass some of that luck my way!!!  lol.

Thank you Boney.....!! I was banking on 066 tonight....SOOOO close!!

Pittsburg, Ks
United States
Member #3382
January 17, 2004
87737 Posts
Offline
 Posted: January 17, 2011, 5:59 am - IP Logged

1/17/11 M/E

146, 147, 148, 149, 156, 157, 158, 159, 167, 168, 169, 178, 179, 189, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 256, 257, 258, 259, 267, 268, 269, 278, 279, 289, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 356, 357, 358, 359, 367, 368, 369, 378, 379, 389

God Bless America

 Page 23 of 43