United States
Member #69,528
January 11, 2009
7,803 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by calabs on Apr 8, 2011
Thank you my friend....! It's been lonely over here. Everyone is MIA
Ill admit that figuring those pairs where hard as heell because i could never come up with the right algorithm to deduce for missing data....plus the nj lottery cant deliver the pre-post draws fast enough for an accurate analysis hence the problem..
in the future im only going to do an even/odd pairing instead of a split pairing in an attempt to increase the probability of a hit....
good luck tonight and hit big my friend hit big.....
United States
Member #98,380
October 6, 2010
53 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by crow on Apr 8, 2011
Ill admit that figuring those pairs where hard as heell because i could never come up with the right algorithm to deduce for missing data....plus the nj lottery cant deliver the pre-post draws fast enough for an accurate analysis hence the problem..
in the future im only going to do an even/odd pairing instead of a split pairing in an attempt to increase the probability of a hit....
good luck tonight and hit big my friend hit big.....
Hey Crow, Where have you been? Hope all is ok.
Miss your posting. Thank for all you do for.
Calab Thanks for your posting and all your hard work
Ridgewood NJ United States
Member #52,537
May 29, 2007
902 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by crow on Apr 8, 2011
Ill admit that figuring those pairs where hard as heell because i could never come up with the right algorithm to deduce for missing data....plus the nj lottery cant deliver the pre-post draws fast enough for an accurate analysis hence the problem..
in the future im only going to do an even/odd pairing instead of a split pairing in an attempt to increase the probability of a hit....
good luck tonight and hit big my friend hit big.....
Hey Crow,
I'd be remiss if I did not give you a nice round of applause for the tireless effort and insight you provide! You and Calabs have really expended the brain waves on this game! It is appreciated!
I agree it is such a challenge to predict this game! I love your approach, and it has provoked a lot of thought on playing smarter!! I am learning that the key mistake most of us make is just 'because'...and that is jumping to conclusion on best numbers to play.
There is a law in math called the law of large numbers. It governs short term results and an important rule is that numbers do not necessarily have to balance out in the short term. Your UCD approach has applied this rule where we look for numbers that show they are making a comeback. We cannot assume a number is ready until it shows that it is!!! Peaking vs neutral and cold! I've been working some models with my software and am seeing with more clarity on when we can bet the numbers that are to peak, and when a number is sliding to cold.
The pre-draws add a lot of curve in there but we use our current trends to predict the future.
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by crow on Apr 8, 2011
Ill admit that figuring those pairs where hard as heell because i could never come up with the right algorithm to deduce for missing data....plus the nj lottery cant deliver the pre-post draws fast enough for an accurate analysis hence the problem..
in the future im only going to do an even/odd pairing instead of a split pairing in an attempt to increase the probability of a hit....
good luck tonight and hit big my friend hit big.....
Thanks crow - I'm beginning to see the light of the theory behind the odd/even pairing. I will have to go back and look at my pairing to see how it can be modified to reflect odd/even only.
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by alibaba917 on Apr 8, 2011
Hey Crow,
I'd be remiss if I did not give you a nice round of applause for the tireless effort and insight you provide! You and Calabs have really expended the brain waves on this game! It is appreciated!
I agree it is such a challenge to predict this game! I love your approach, and it has provoked a lot of thought on playing smarter!! I am learning that the key mistake most of us make is just 'because'...and that is jumping to conclusion on best numbers to play.
There is a law in math called the law of large numbers. It governs short term results and an important rule is that numbers do not necessarily have to balance out in the short term. Your UCD approach has applied this rule where we look for numbers that show they are making a comeback. We cannot assume a number is ready until it shows that it is!!! Peaking vs neutral and cold! I've been working some models with my software and am seeing with more clarity on when we can bet the numbers that are to peak, and when a number is sliding to cold.
The pre-draws add a lot of curve in there but we use our current trends to predict the future.
Best of luck to you!
Alan
Thank you Alan, Those predraws have forced us all to rethink how to evaluate the game. The one thing that appears to be "fairly" consistant in all this is the little "shortbox". It's the exception when it doesn't pull out a pair, or the whole number.
United States
Member #69,528
January 11, 2009
7,803 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by alibaba917 on Apr 8, 2011
Hey Crow,
I'd be remiss if I did not give you a nice round of applause for the tireless effort and insight you provide! You and Calabs have really expended the brain waves on this game! It is appreciated!
I agree it is such a challenge to predict this game! I love your approach, and it has provoked a lot of thought on playing smarter!! I am learning that the key mistake most of us make is just 'because'...and that is jumping to conclusion on best numbers to play.
There is a law in math called the law of large numbers. It governs short term results and an important rule is that numbers do not necessarily have to balance out in the short term. Your UCD approach has applied this rule where we look for numbers that show they are making a comeback. We cannot assume a number is ready until it shows that it is!!! Peaking vs neutral and cold! I've been working some models with my software and am seeing with more clarity on when we can bet the numbers that are to peak, and when a number is sliding to cold.
The pre-draws add a lot of curve in there but we use our current trends to predict the future.
Best of luck to you!
Alan
Thank you for all your hard work,Alan.
Ive tried all the binomial/hypergeometric distribution modeling with kurtosis and skewness but still the results are minimal at best for accuracy with absent data being the culprit.
Trust me my friend Ive made a lot of mistakes in the past trying to figure this game out to where im almost a zombie....