United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
You know me....I like to tinker! I think it has something to do with the days I used to play with my Erector set and Lincoln Logs . Anyway, I've been doing some tracking using tiers I generate from some boxes. While I haven't done much back testing (it takes FOREVER to generate these numbers), over the past 19 draws, the number has shown in 17 of the draws ~89.5%). The tiers produce a lot of numbers, but this may be a tool to use if the testing continues to be positive to say "if it ain't on the list, don't play it"! The set tonight produces 101 numbers, singles and doubles combined (I've excluded triples), so that reduces the number pool down from 210 possible single/double combos (boxed of course). I will try and post these as much as possible when I have the time, but will keep track even if I don't post the tiers. Good luck, and I hope this new idea helps to reduce the number set by over 50%!!!! (89% success rate by reducing the pool over 50% is a good combination!!). Still a work in progress.......
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by calabs on Jul 10, 2011
You know me....I like to tinker! I think it has something to do with the days I used to play with my Erector set and Lincoln Logs . Anyway, I've been doing some tracking using tiers I generate from some boxes. While I haven't done much back testing (it takes FOREVER to generate these numbers), over the past 19 draws, the number has shown in 17 of the draws ~89.5%). The tiers produce a lot of numbers, but this may be a tool to use if the testing continues to be positive to say "if it ain't on the list, don't play it"! The set tonight produces 101 numbers, singles and doubles combined (I've excluded triples), so that reduces the number pool down from 210 possible single/double combos (boxed of course). I will try and post these as much as possible when I have the time, but will keep track even if I don't post the tiers. Good luck, and I hope this new idea helps to reduce the number set by over 50%!!!! (89% success rate by reducing the pool over 50% is a good combination!!). Still a work in progress.......
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by calabs on Jul 10, 2011
You know me....I like to tinker! I think it has something to do with the days I used to play with my Erector set and Lincoln Logs . Anyway, I've been doing some tracking using tiers I generate from some boxes. While I haven't done much back testing (it takes FOREVER to generate these numbers), over the past 19 draws, the number has shown in 17 of the draws ~89.5%). The tiers produce a lot of numbers, but this may be a tool to use if the testing continues to be positive to say "if it ain't on the list, don't play it"! The set tonight produces 101 numbers, singles and doubles combined (I've excluded triples), so that reduces the number pool down from 210 possible single/double combos (boxed of course). I will try and post these as much as possible when I have the time, but will keep track even if I don't post the tiers. Good luck, and I hope this new idea helps to reduce the number set by over 50%!!!! (89% success rate by reducing the pool over 50% is a good combination!!). Still a work in progress.......