Massachusetts Lottery to end TV broadcasts

Jul 27, 2011, 3:07 pm (32 comments)

Massachusetts Lottery

Starting Aug. 15 the Massachusetts Lottery will only show video replays of its in-state lottery drawings on its Web site, shifting away from the television format that players in Massachusetts have grown accustomed to since the 1970s.

Ending its agreement with current broadcast partner WCVB-Channel 5, Lottery officials will host its daily drawings mid-day and in the evening at their Braintree headquarters and post the full drawing online at masslottery.com "just minutes after the drawing occurs."

The change applies to The Numbers Game, Cash WinFall, Mass Cash, and Megabucks Doubler. Links to multi-state drawings for Mega Millions and Powerball also will be provided on the site.

"It's just not economically feasible to be on air anymore," said Beth Bresnahan, the Lottery's assistant executive director.

The Lottery currently pays about $20,000 a month in rent to WCVB for the right to broadcast Lottery drawing results for 10 seconds twice a day. With a diminished $2 million advertising budget over the past several years, officials said they rebid that contract and received two offers, including one at more than double the current price from WCVB and another from Boston.com for roughly $600,000 a year, a bid that factored in costs associated with building a studio to broadcast the drawings, officials said.

Over the years, the Lottery has seen its time on TV shrink from one minute on air, to 45 seconds, then 30 seconds and now 10 seconds, prohibiting the Lottery from even broadcasting the drawing and leaving it with only enough time to display the results.

By moving the drawings to its website, Bresnahan said, the Lottery will be able to show the full drawing and reach players in central and western Massachusetts that do not have access to Boston stations.

The Lottery has partnered with WCVB since 2004, but previously held contracts with Channel 7 and Channel 4 in the Boston market. Results from the drawings will continue to be provided to local television stations and daily newspapers for publication.

Massachusetts lottery results are presented immediately after each drawing on Lottery Post's Massachusetts Lottery Results page.

Boston Herald, Lottery Post Staff

Comments

maringoman's avatarmaringoman

The State of Massachusetts loves being first. A few years ago it was the first state to legalize gay marriage now internet drawing. There is rumor of internet gambling in the air.  Haha maybe polygamy will soon be legalized..um, Utah has that...forgetaboutitWink

duckman's avatarduckman

Not broadcasting LIVE drawings on over-the-air TV is a very bad idea. Most lotteries take security and integrity as a high priority and by not offering live drawings over broadcast TV station(s) this jeopardizes the public's perception of fair and honest drawings.

The lottery is such a huge profit maker and should have no problem financially  doing whatever it takes to keep the LIVE drawings on free broadcast TV...

haymaker's avatarhaymaker

i've heard that ,you should "never say never" i'gonna take a chance . "you will never see a lottery drawing watching the superbowl "

i don't think that wasted any mojo .

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

I think democrat John Kerry and his wife oughta kick in to keep it on the air.

They could use some of that tax money they cheat the state out of by parking their 7 million dollar yacht in Rhode Island.

JonnyBgood07's avatarJonnyBgood07

What as*holes.I hope sales plummet.Aren't they aware the only thing that makes lottery seems valid is that people can see the balls bouncing in the hopper?

It's funny how the players have to take a hit in this way because the finances aren't there but i'm sure the finances are there to keep printing scratch off tickets or model some new games thoughDead

sully16's avatarsully16

They never learn.

faber98

they haven't show the bouncing balls for the daily numbers for a few years now anyway. they just post up the results on the late news. they have so many games now that the newspeople get confused as to what game they're showing the results for. yes, rdgrnner, your deep seething hatred for ma dems is somewhat justified. the kerrys paid to get a fire hydrant moved from in front of their boston townhouse to create an extra parking space for their vehicle, so why not  pay for the tv 15 second spot. i suggest you stop buying heinz ketchup to help bankrupt them since his wife owns the company.

joshuacloak's avatarjoshuacloak

i rather agree with lottery on this one

its 2011, soon to be 2012

its the news Job to report stuff

the fact lottery's have been paying them to tell  their watchers, Who watch them for news.info, the info is a joke, your payhing them to do their job

just post drawings online, at your website. 

if the people don't get their lottery numbers form online, they just find a other way :P, they always do

JimmySand9

The important thing is that they're keeping the balls intact. So many states have used television costs as justification for computerizing drawings (even as some kept TV contracts going). Plus, IIRC, WCVB was only showing the drawing for The Numbers Game, and was just flashing a graphic for the other games. So, in a way, this is actually increasing public exposure.

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by faber98 on Jul 27, 2011

they haven't show the bouncing balls for the daily numbers for a few years now anyway. they just post up the results on the late news. they have so many games now that the newspeople get confused as to what game they're showing the results for. yes, rdgrnner, your deep seething hatred for ma dems is somewhat justified. the kerrys paid to get a fire hydrant moved from in front of their boston townhouse to create an extra parking space for their vehicle, so why not  pay for the tv 15 second spot. i suggest you stop buying heinz ketchup to help bankrupt them since his wife owns the company.

I don't have a "deep seething hatred" for anybody, faber. I just don't like hypocritical scam artists like Kerry pissin' on my leg and tellin me it's raining.

He's never met a tax he didn't like and has voted for every new tax and old tax and tax increase and tax extension that came before him. But when he had his 7 million dollar yacht built (in France) and realized he would have to pay one of those large confiscatory taxes he wants everyone else to pay just to moor it in Mass, he put it in Rhode Island to avoid paying that tax to his state. What a two-faced hypocrite. What a slimy weasel.

But does that make the dems mad?

Nope. Guys like him are heroes to the libs, they love him and will re-elect him by a landslide for the rest of his life.

Trillionaire

Quote: Originally posted by faber98 on Jul 27, 2011

they haven't show the bouncing balls for the daily numbers for a few years now anyway. they just post up the results on the late news. they have so many games now that the newspeople get confused as to what game they're showing the results for. yes, rdgrnner, your deep seething hatred for ma dems is somewhat justified. the kerrys paid to get a fire hydrant moved from in front of their boston townhouse to create an extra parking space for their vehicle, so why not  pay for the tv 15 second spot. i suggest you stop buying heinz ketchup to help bankrupt them since his wife owns the company.

Heinz ketchup is the best so I'll continue to buy it.

Trillionaire

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jul 27, 2011

I think democrat John Kerry and his wife oughta kick in to keep it on the air.

They could use some of that tax money they cheat the state out of by parking their 7 million dollar yacht in Rhode Island.

There you go again picking on democrats! And rich ones to boot.

Are they breaking any laws by parking their $7,000,000 yacht in Rhode Island?

haymaker's avatarhaymaker

Quote: Originally posted by Trillionaire on Jul 28, 2011

There you go again picking on democrats! And rich ones to boot.

Are they breaking any laws by parking their $7,000,000 yacht in Rhode Island?

their breaking the spirit of the law by useing a loophole,and he knows it, think he has a law degree,most of em do.

leona "only little people pay taxes " helmsley would be proud .

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by Trillionaire on Jul 28, 2011

Heinz ketchup is the best so I'll continue to buy it.

You keep buying those American products and if I ever have a need for a hockey puck I'll give you a call.

Try some of that cheap ketchup on your wolverine casserole. Yummmm!

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by Trillionaire on Jul 28, 2011

Heinz ketchup is the best so I'll continue to buy it.

Knock yourself out. I don't eat ketchup.

But if I did, it wouldn't be that cheap crap.

I'd get the good stuff.

dallascowboyfan's avatardallascowboyfan

Shame on you Massachusetts.....No No

faber98

the point was that teresa heinz kerry, whose husband rdgrnr claims to dislike not hate, owns heinz ketchup. since he is claiming to be the oracle of the appalachians he could singlehandedly begin a boycott of heinz ketchup (if there are any stores in appalachia) to help bankrupt the kerrys, helping to end the seige of ma dems influence in this country which he seems to be obsessed with defeating. he may not be wrong, but having the hill people using their food stamps on another brand would be a good way to start.

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by faber98 on Jul 28, 2011

the point was that teresa heinz kerry, whose husband rdgrnr claims to dislike not hate, owns heinz ketchup. since he is claiming to be the oracle of the appalachians he could singlehandedly begin a boycott of heinz ketchup (if there are any stores in appalachia) to help bankrupt the kerrys, helping to end the seige of ma dems influence in this country which he seems to be obsessed with defeating. he may not be wrong, but having the hill people using their food stamps on another brand would be a good way to start.

I reckon if we wanted ketchup (which we don't) we'd just commence to mashin maters.

But we don't use ketchup up in here.

We use gravy.

Do heinz make gravy?

Don't make us no never mind no how.

We make our own.

Trillionaire

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jul 28, 2011

You keep buying those American products and if I ever have a need for a hockey puck I'll give you a call.

Try some of that cheap ketchup on your wolverine casserole. Yummmm!

We eat good Canadian beaver, not wolverine.

Trillionaire

Quote: Originally posted by haymaker on Jul 28, 2011

their breaking the spirit of the law by useing a loophole,and he knows it, think he has a law degree,most of em do.

leona "only little people pay taxes " helmsley would be proud .

Until the loophole is closed they're within their rights to make use of it. It's the way the system works.

inittowin's avatarinittowin

When you can't watch it live... You can't trust it! The FL lottery did the same thing for the daily games.

The suits that make the decisions are far too smart for their own good.

haymaker's avatarhaymaker

Quote: Originally posted by Trillionaire on Jul 28, 2011

Until the loophole is closed they're within their rights to make use of it. It's the way the system works.

  " when one loophole closes another one opens "

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by haymaker on Jul 28, 2011

  " when one loophole closes another one opens "

That's right haymaker.

They make the laws for us, not them.

Just like Obamacare, they excluded themselves and their families from it.

Gotta hand it to Obama and his democrats, they take good care of themselves. No Death Panels or pain pills for their aged parents when they need operations. Only the best for their families. And who will pay for it? Us!

I can't wait to see the reaction of the clowns that voted for these guys when they go to sell their houses and find out they have to give 3 1/2% of any profit to the federal government to help support Obamacare. It's in the bill, it's law. That was one of the reasons Nancy Pelosi didn't want anybody to read the bill until they passed it. 

I'll never forget those words by Nancy Pelosi: "We have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it."

Have you ever heard anything so frigging stupid in your life?

She's considered a genius in California though. They love her.

San Francisco CrazyHippywoooo hooooo!

jimmy4164

Quote: Originally posted by JimmySand9 on Jul 28, 2011

The important thing is that they're keeping the balls intact. So many states have used television costs as justification for computerizing drawings (even as some kept TV contracts going). Plus, IIRC, WCVB was only showing the drawing for The Numbers Game, and was just flashing a graphic for the other games. So, in a way, this is actually increasing public exposure.

Good point...

jimmy4164

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jul 29, 2011

That's right haymaker.

They make the laws for us, not them.

Just like Obamacare, they excluded themselves and their families from it.

Gotta hand it to Obama and his democrats, they take good care of themselves. No Death Panels or pain pills for their aged parents when they need operations. Only the best for their families. And who will pay for it? Us!

I can't wait to see the reaction of the clowns that voted for these guys when they go to sell their houses and find out they have to give 3 1/2% of any profit to the federal government to help support Obamacare. It's in the bill, it's law. That was one of the reasons Nancy Pelosi didn't want anybody to read the bill until they passed it. 

I'll never forget those words by Nancy Pelosi: "We have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it."

Have you ever heard anything so frigging stupid in your life?

She's considered a genius in California though. They love her.

San Francisco CrazyHippywoooo hooooo!

"Just like Obamacare, they excluded themselves and their families from it."

I don't think so...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/28thamendment.asp

"In fact, the final version of the health care reform legislation that was eventually passed in March 2010 stated that 'Members of Congress and congressional staff' will only have access to plans that are created by the health care bill or offered through the exchanges established by the bill..."

--Jimmy4164

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jul 29, 2011

"Just like Obamacare, they excluded themselves and their families from it."

I don't think so...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/28thamendment.asp

"In fact, the final version of the health care reform legislation that was eventually passed in March 2010 stated that 'Members of Congress and congressional staff' will only have access to plans that are created by the health care bill or offered through the exchanges established by the bill..."

--Jimmy4164

Thanks for your attempt to circumvent truth by a deft comparison of apples and oranges

by the liberal husband and wife team of SNOPES when neither of the two (apples or oranges) 

had anything to do with the topic at hand, Nancy.

 

But it's the thought that counts.

jimmy4164

Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jul 29, 2011

"Just like Obamacare, they excluded themselves and their families from it."

I don't think so...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/28thamendment.asp

"In fact, the final version of the health care reform legislation that was eventually passed in March 2010 stated that 'Members of Congress and congressional staff' will only have access to plans that are created by the health care bill or offered through the exchanges established by the bill..."

--Jimmy4164

rdgrnr says in response,

"Thanks for your attempt to circumvent truth by a deft comparison of apples and oranges by the liberal husband and wife team of SNOPES when neither of the two (apples or oranges)  had anything to do with the topic at hand, Nancy.

But it's the thought that counts."

Inasmuch as the article I linked to deals directly with your phoney claim that lawmakers excluded themselves from "Obamacare," it is precisely on point!  Since you reject the Snopes team, perhaps you'll consider the Factcheck people's take on it:

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/01/lawmaker-loopholes/

By the way, just what do YOU consider is the TRUTH in this matter, and how do you support your position?  If you are going to spread garbage, you must be prepared to [try to] back it up.  A good start would be to cite articles in the final legislation that disagree with the Snopes assessment.

--Jimmy4164

haymaker's avatarhaymaker

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jul 29, 2011

That's right haymaker.

They make the laws for us, not them.

Just like Obamacare, they excluded themselves and their families from it.

Gotta hand it to Obama and his democrats, they take good care of themselves. No Death Panels or pain pills for their aged parents when they need operations. Only the best for their families. And who will pay for it? Us!

I can't wait to see the reaction of the clowns that voted for these guys when they go to sell their houses and find out they have to give 3 1/2% of any profit to the federal government to help support Obamacare. It's in the bill, it's law. That was one of the reasons Nancy Pelosi didn't want anybody to read the bill until they passed it. 

I'll never forget those words by Nancy Pelosi: "We have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it."

Have you ever heard anything so frigging stupid in your life?

She's considered a genius in California though. They love her.

San Francisco CrazyHippywoooo hooooo!

when up to $500,000 of profit on your home was exempted,they said now theres no need to save you're repair and improvements receipts.

i still save every last on.

cause i don't trust em.

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jul 29, 2011

rdgrnr says in response,

"Thanks for your attempt to circumvent truth by a deft comparison of apples and oranges by the liberal husband and wife team of SNOPES when neither of the two (apples or oranges)  had anything to do with the topic at hand, Nancy.

But it's the thought that counts."

Inasmuch as the article I linked to deals directly with your phoney claim that lawmakers excluded themselves from "Obamacare," it is precisely on point!  Since you reject the Snopes team, perhaps you'll consider the Factcheck people's take on it:

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/01/lawmaker-loopholes/

By the way, just what do YOU consider is the TRUTH in this matter, and how do you support your position?  If you are going to spread garbage, you must be prepared to [try to] back it up.  A good start would be to cite articles in the final legislation that disagree with the Snopes assessment.

--Jimmy4164

LOL, from wiki to snopes to annenberg, ha ha ha ha ha! What a joke you are.

For the love of God, Nancy, who the hell are you going to source next, George Soros? Harry Reid? Barney Frank? Michael Moore?

I've said it before and I'll say it again and you keep proving it: You are an insufferable moron, Nancy.

You're still my favorite tranny whipping boy though.

Alrighty then! Back to the men's room with you, Nancy!

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by haymaker on Jul 29, 2011

when up to $500,000 of profit on your home was exempted,they said now theres no need to save you're repair and improvements receipts.

i still save every last on.

cause i don't trust em.

haymaker's avatarhaymaker

ok i'll buy. Yes Nod

Spincognito

I live and play in Mass and I am happy about this decission. They are actually drawing the numbers in front of an audience at Lottery Headquarters, Then within minutes a video of the drawing will be posted. Now I get to see the balls-a-bouncing and watch to see if they bounce into my numbers or if my numbers bounce out for JP games. It has been years since they have shown the drawings live so this is almost as good.

End of comments
Subscribe to this news story