Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 18, 2017, 9:18 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

North Carolina: 9/1 - 9/30/2011

Topic closed. 2008 replies. Last post 5 years ago by alexdad.

Page 73 of 134
58
PrintE-mailLink
powerplay1a's avatar - animal bird.jpg
raleigh north carolina
United States
Member #103999
January 8, 2011
792 Posts
Offline
Posted: September 15, 2011, 8:27 pm - IP Logged

Playing 313 811 696 969 322 803 902 515 666 999

    OneHitAway's avatar - 2011 audi-a7-jpg.jpg
    Charlotte, NC
    United States
    Member #109077
    April 5, 2011
    722 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: September 15, 2011, 8:35 pm - IP Logged

    Playing 313 811 696 969 322 803 902 515 666 999

    wow we are thinking the same i played 669,996,611,616,911,666,999,444,111,777

    Lottery is not random, research pays off!!!

      sonnet's avatar - Lottery-005.jpg

      United States
      Member #68994
      January 3, 2009
      1153 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: September 15, 2011, 8:49 pm - IP Logged

      Crow, 

       

      Congrats on your mid-day win.

      WTG on getting the NCEL moolah.Hurray!


      I have a question, if you don't mind.  Some  players post a host of pairs, but what is perplexing to me,  is how are these pairs derived?  Is it based on past matches and affiliated followers based on the historical record or trends?

      /s 


        United States
        Member #69530
        January 11, 2009
        7803 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: September 15, 2011, 9:11 pm - IP Logged

        Crow, 

         

        Congrats on your mid-day win.

        WTG on getting the NCEL moolah.Hurray!


        I have a question, if you don't mind.  Some  players post a host of pairs, but what is perplexing to me,  is how are these pairs derived?  Is it based on past matches and affiliated followers based on the historical record or trends?

        /s 

        Are you saying that you want me to give you a lengthy binomial/hypergeometric distribution modeling algorithm as a means of accuracy?

        I discovered some time back that those algorithms were very difficult to model based on missing data....which is why i complain a lot about "missing data".

        If you look back at some of my posts regarding quantum entanglement/modeling you'll see i caught a lot of helll for some of my ideas which is why i decided to keep my mouth shut and instead work on fitting in with my attempts at being a comic...

        in a way i think its just a lot easier and i got tired of arguing all the time about theory anyway.

        sorry for my sarcasm....but i just cant seem to kick the comic relief symptom/syndrome...

        very best wishes/luck to you my friend sonnet.

          Blackie's avatar - Norfolk 20Sunrise%20Nov%2016.jpg
          Norfolk , Va
          United States
          Member #4541
          May 2, 2004
          25172 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: September 15, 2011, 9:19 pm - IP Logged

          Way to call the pairs Blackie!Drum

          Thanks!

          Thanks Vergie !!

           

           Good Luck,

          Blackie.                           

            Avatar

            United States
            Member #99929
            November 3, 2010
            581 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: September 15, 2011, 9:25 pm - IP Logged

            443  453  463  643  653  663  243  253  263  943  953  963

            114  115  117  174  175  177  414  415  417  474  475  477

            444

            Outside The Box...

              sonnet's avatar - Lottery-005.jpg

              United States
              Member #68994
              January 3, 2009
              1153 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: September 15, 2011, 9:25 pm - IP Logged

              Oh hell no!  I understand the diffculties of the alogrithms and the consquent programming issues.  Not possible because of missing data and imputing is a waste ot time.  Was just wondering whether it is a gut relationship based on past, following drawn #s. 


              For example, for tonite, I have the following deducted plays:

              335, 535, 538

              outliers=492, 890, 708

              long shot=328, if not 380 in the mix. 

              chances are 50/50 no clear absolute chance in the prediction---just a guest-estimate

              /s


                United States
                Member #69530
                January 11, 2009
                7803 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: September 15, 2011, 9:33 pm - IP Logged

                Crow, 

                 

                Congrats on your mid-day win.

                WTG on getting the NCEL moolah.Hurray!


                I have a question, if you don't mind.  Some  players post a host of pairs, but what is perplexing to me,  is how are these pairs derived?  Is it based on past matches and affiliated followers based on the historical record or trends?

                /s 

                Sorry for my last post... i'll try to answer your question more directly.

                Pairs are very hard to predict for especially when you try to narrow pairs down to as little as 2 or 3 pairs...

                Because there is missing data in pre-draws this makes things even more difficult given that no one really knows what is missing and what is not.

                Based on just pure statistics given pairs have to hit so the real trick is in trying to figure out what structure is "actually" missing. It seems that we are lacking 4/5's of the data needed to achieve a "somewhat" uniform understanding of the game ....it is this reason why it is hard to compile the correct algorithm based on any known percentage value.

                Here are the odd and even pairs that hit in all combination configurations in pick 3 unmatched:

                13x-15x-17x-19x-35x-37x-39x-57x-59x-79x

                02x-04x-06x-08x-24x-26x-28x-46x-48x-68x

                Let say for example that the digits 5-7 haven't been seen together in 80 draws then the 4/5's absentee rule can apply.

                combinations played would be ---> 570-571-572-573-574-575-576-577-578-579

                  big dr's avatar - animaniacs41
                  raleigh north carolina
                  United States
                  Member #74039
                  May 1, 2009
                  1076 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: September 15, 2011, 9:42 pm - IP Logged

                  632 218 619 519 426 129 good luck

                    sonnet's avatar - Lottery-005.jpg

                    United States
                    Member #68994
                    January 3, 2009
                    1153 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: September 15, 2011, 10:06 pm - IP Logged

                    Sorry for my last post... i'll try to answer your question more directly.

                    Pairs are very hard to predict for especially when you try to narrow pairs down to as little as 2 or 3 pairs...

                    Because there is missing data in pre-draws this makes things even more difficult given that no one really knows what is missing and what is not.

                    Based on just pure statistics given pairs have to hit so the real trick is in trying to figure out what structure is "actually" missing. It seems that we are lacking 4/5's of the data needed to achieve a "somewhat" uniform understanding of the game ....it is this reason why it is hard to compile the correct algorithm based on any known percentage value.

                    Here are the odd and even pairs that hit in all combination configurations in pick 3 unmatched:

                    13x-15x-17x-19x-35x-37x-39x-57x-59x-79x

                    02x-04x-06x-08x-24x-26x-28x-46x-48x-68x

                    Let say for example that the digits 5-7 haven't been seen together in 80 draws then the 4/5's absentee rule can apply.

                    combinations played would be ---> 570-571-572-573-574-575-576-577-578-579

                    Crow,

                     

                    No need to be sorry.  Discussion is good, because it helps to clarify some of the cobwebs, I may have had.  Your explanation helps me to understand how the pairs are derived, and also will in the future help me to sharpen my focus and understand what are the missing keys.

                     

                    For example, I suspected  that the "62" was coming in, based on gut instinct, but did not play the entire set (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) and therefore lost. Therefore, I was just inquiring, on how one can deduce the probablepairs  with a "clinical/statistical eye", instead of gut feeling. 

                    You presented a good analysis--much appreciated. 

                    /s

                      Avatar
                      Harleyville NC
                      United States
                      Member #99856
                      November 1, 2010
                      491 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: September 15, 2011, 10:29 pm - IP Logged

                      Phone lines down so I cant play, anyways was going with 504,390,480,705,580and 680....

                      300....622...703....269......936.......168....224.....335.......No Trips!!!!

                        a1agape's avatar - ththhottieducky6of4rk
                        RichGirl
                        United States
                        Member #102479
                        December 20, 2010
                        319 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: September 15, 2011, 10:45 pm - IP Logged

                        my plays

                        005

                        007

                        321

                        141

                        205

                        828

                        822

                        827

                        224

                        565

                        403

                        821

                        946

                        *128* my pet number ***Hit baby hit!!!***

                        Smash

                          teebug's avatar - Lottery-001.jpg

                          United States
                          Member #91067
                          May 9, 2010
                          229 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: September 15, 2011, 11:24 pm - IP Logged

                          403/6159

                            JPansy's avatar - nw gingfighter.jpg
                            Gastonia, North Carolina
                            United States
                            Member #66142
                            October 16, 2008
                            406 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: September 15, 2011, 11:25 pm - IP Logged

                            NC Eve # 403 / 6159

                            FAITH
                            FAMILY
                            FRIENDS

                            The Keys To True Happiness

                              sassymrsjay's avatar - Lottery-062.jpg
                              NC
                              United States
                              Member #113389
                              July 8, 2011
                              652 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: September 15, 2011, 11:30 pm - IP Logged

                              Wtg a1agape!!!!!!! Str88888888888888

                                 
                                Page 73 of 134