JKING
What you seem to be asking has no answer, a filter is a filter. Reduction filters all do one thing, they reduce.
The only good filter is a filter who's value can be predicted and at the end of the day every filter does the exact
same thing. It does not really matter how or what a filter does it only matters that it is set correctly. Math
cannot predict the lottery but we can gain some good insight as to what is expected. If given a choice of using
math or instinct I would choose instinct over math for any lottery. You cannot change the odds for the game
just like you can't squeeze apple juce from a peach. I believe the human element plus faith plus hope plus a
number of other things are all factors in how one does. Two people can use the same software or method and
one will do very well and other very poorly. This has no bearing on how smart a person is or how much math is
applied. If you want to take lottery prediction to the next level try a supernatural or mistical approach. There
are math based systems that will give you the most bang for the buck but all require some sort of reduction in
the first stages, this includes wheels. Wheeling 12 numbers taken from a pool of 59 is reducing the pool by 47
numbers as the first stage. From that point on math can be used to ensure a certian prize if part or all of the
winning numbers are in the 12 selected. I win many prizes and have trapped many JP's within a very small
percent of the total possible but out of all those times I have only done it once when I held the tickets in my
hand. I do far better than the odds would suggest and it is not because of the software I use it is because I
make good guesses. I also think that anyone can do this that does not rely on math, as I have said before
If you use math to make a selection then expect the results to follow the odds. It seems to me that everyone
with a system falls just short of defining the only real bit of data that is truly needed. It's not the system it's
the ability of the user to make good guesses for the static set of choices the system offers. Any system should
be able to reduce any matrix to one winning line providing the choices are correct. For me it is the last 5% that
seems to form the barrier that keeps us seperated from the JP's
RL