United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoBoner on Sep 4, 2012
I am in too!! It would be interesting to play the superstrings of alternate realities creating rippling affects that drop down into the subconsious randomization of lottery balls.
Although at times playing 5 numbers in a row can be a good strategy and can easily trap 3 or 4 numbers, which is a small prize.
Here is my dollar!
Ok, I got two bucks, anyone for 3?
The number 3 is a magical and spooky number, especially at a distance. The farther you hold it out it looks like an 8.
This happens due to the flux capacity during the phase diameter inference I mentioned earlier. A dynamic preponderance of the evidence may not be useful with this case, but nevertheless, one of many superstring anomolies, specifically the triangular "distortion field" theory, may pose an erroneous result when merged. But I digress. It's a de-randomization process I will elaborate on later. For now, an A-systematic fluctuation needs to be represented here as far as the Quantum algorithms are concerned.
United States
Member #124,487
March 14, 2012
7,021 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by onlymoney on Sep 4, 2012
Ok, I got two bucks, anyone for 3?
The number 3 is a magical and spooky number, especially at a distance. The farther you hold it out it looks like an 8.
This happens due to the flux capacity during the phase diameter inference I mentioned earlier. A dynamic preponderance of the evidence may not be useful with this case, but nevertheless, one of many superstring anomolies, specifically the triangular "distortion field" theory, may pose an erroneous result when merged. But I digress. It's a de-randomization process I will elaborate on later. For now, an A-systematic fluctuation needs to be represented here as far as the Quantum algorithms are concerned.
Very true only money,
certainly the triangular "distortion field" must be minimized using the harmonization properties inherent in the sinusoidal flux fields thereby cancelling out the erroneous anamolous within the conclusive data.
also if you turn the number 3 90 degrees, it looks like a butt. ω which also happens to betheomega symbol.
United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Sep 3, 2012
It cost nothing to stick your experiment on the prediction board, that is if you want to show it off.
If you're just testing for your own benefit, why buy any tickets at all, just write the numbers you would have played on a piece of paper and check them after the drawing.
NEW YORK United States
Member #90,531
April 29, 2010
13,285 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoGuyBC on Sep 3, 2012
I Will Win A Lottery Jackpot Someday.
I Will Play The Lottery Someday.
I WILL BUY A LOTTERY TICKET SOMEDAY.
You have nothing better to say, that is why you make fun of my threads. You wrote the above post to make fun of me.Do not write my threads again on lottery post. Please write your own.You should give me credit out of respect.