Talk about W-I-D-T-H-SPrev Topic Next Topic

Maxxx

Cebu City
Philippines
Member #143,410
June 2, 2013
26 Posts
Offline

Aug 23, 2013, 12:54 pm

Widths been haunting me lately. A "maybe" ....... width can also occupy the biggest filters.

In my opinion, using width alone produces staggering amount of cuts on numbers to play.

Problem is (I know it represents the gaps on spaces on the numbers involved) I need more facts on widths and its specifics and how they correlate on daily drawings so that I’ll know I’m in the right way.

I’ve been digging on history forums regarding WIDTHs and how they were used but I didn’t find any, sure did find opinions, but the way how lottery games were dissected using widths and their relationship to daily drawing is what I wanted to know , to start with is pick 3 then up..

Anyway, here’s a few data of past results of about 690 draws with corresponding widths and their skips.

Width

0 – 1.01 %

1 – 6.22 %

2 – 9.26 %

3 – 12.59 %

4 – 15.05 %

5 – 15.63 %

6 – 16.35 %

7 – 11.72 %

8 – 8.97 %

9 - 3.18 %

Seems to me that’s a 100%.

Setting your average daily game in range of 2 – 7 width produces 80.61 % of the drawn nos. with minimum skip of 1 and a max skip of 3.

Setting range at 3 – 6 width occupies 59.62% of that 690 draws, a minimum skip of 1 and a maximum skip of 10. That’s more than 50%.

Furthermore

Width

W Times Cur.Skp Av.Skp Math.AvSkp MedianSkip Max skip

0 88 0 7.86 6.9 5 36

1 154 18 4.49 4.12 3 18

2 138 2 5.01 5.21 3 23

3 104 6 6.65 6.8 4 23

4 95 1 7.28 9.26 4 29

5 58 3 11.93 13.33 7 38

6 27 15 25.63 20.83 13 73

7 21 39 32.95 37.04 35 85

8 7 153 98.86 83.33 69 176

9 0 692 0 333.33

Middle-Highest

0 107 3 6.47 6.9 5 22

1 175 4 3.95 4.12 2 22

2 155 1 4.46 5.21 2 24

3 99 11 6.99 6.8 3 26

4 70 14 9.89 9.26 5 52

5 48 0 14.42 13.33 9 62

6 23 33 30.09 20.83 24 129

7 8 63 86.5 37.04 30 256

8 5 54 138.4 83.33 91 228

9 2 17 346 333.33 17 239

Low-Highest

0 7 60 98.86 100 72 203

1 43 4 16.09 18.52 9 89

2 64 10 10.81 10.42 7 49

3 87 8 7.95 7.94 5 32

4 105 2 6.59 6.94 4 33

5 108 0 6.41 6.67 4 26

6 113 1 6.12 6.94 3 30

7 81 5 8.54 7.94 5 32

8 62 15 11.16 14.42 7 53

9 22 17 31.45 18.52 18 112

XX_

0 77 12 8.99 10 5 33

1 119 4 5.82 5.56 3 28

2 115 1 6.02 6.25 3 36

3 98 8 7.06 7.14 4 38

4 80 2 8.65 8.33 5 31

5 86 0 8.05 10 5 34

6 54 15 12.81 12.5 9 53

7 34 39 20.35 16.67 17 109

8 21 24 32.95 25 19 94

9 8 17 86.5 50 55 161

_XX

0 67 0 10.33 10 6 54

1 131 4 5.28 5.56 3 26

2 116 2 5.97 6.25 3 30

3 95 8 7.28 7.14 3 39

4 97 1 7.13 8.33 5 24

5 59 6 11.73 10 8 38

6 61 7 11.34 12.5 6 53

7 32 5 21.63 16.67 13 152

8 27 15 25.63 25 21 62

9 7 85 98.86 50 85 275

X_X

0 58 4 11.93 10 8 63

1 122 7 5.67 5.56 3 19

2 126 2 5.49 6.25 2 37

3 97 6 7.13 7.14 4 28

4 93 12 7.44 8.33 4 33

5 69 0 10.03 10 6 42

6 48 1 14.42 12.5 7 73

7 44 63 15.73 16.67 10 63

8 26 23 26.62 25 14 76

9 9 17 76.89 50 21 224

Stats like that are what I consider beautiful in nature. Coupled with those few HighLows, ODD/EVEN, Sum, LDR’s, Roots, Series2,3,4,5,6, Consecutives/NON, Doubles, Triples and individuals unique way of distinguishing patterns will be significant to our daily pools.

As time permits, I’ll try to look for a deeper way on understanding widths itself, at the moment, I’m entertaining my curiosity of the idea that width is a powerhouse when it comes to filters until proven not profitable/constant displacement in space as the way numbers were drawn on a daily basis.

-Any opinions regarding widths will always be appreciated.

-Maxxx
cash4ninja

United States
Member #141,254
April 9, 2013
1,390 Posts
Offline

Aug 23, 2013, 1:02 pm

Will get you Paid
adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Aug 23, 2013, 5:42 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Maxxx on Aug 23, 2013
Widths been haunting me lately. A "maybe" ....... width can also occupy the biggest filters.

In my opinion, using width alone produces staggering amount of cuts on numbers to play.

Problem is (I know it represents the gaps on spaces on the numbers involved) I need more facts on widths and its specifics and how they correlate on daily drawings so that I’ll know I’m in the right way.

I’ve been digging on history forums regarding WIDTHs and how they were used but I didn’t find any, sure did find opinions, but the way how lottery games were dissected using widths and their relationship to daily drawing is what I wanted to know , to start with is pick 3 then up..

Anyway, here’s a few data of past results of about 690 draws with corresponding widths and their skips.

Width

0 – 1.01 %

1 – 6.22 %

2 – 9.26 %

3 – 12.59 %

4 – 15.05 %

5 – 15.63 %

6 – 16.35 %

7 – 11.72 %

8 – 8.97 %

9 - 3.18 %

Seems to me that’s a 100%.

Setting your average daily game in range of 2 – 7 width produces 80.61 % of the drawn nos. with minimum skip of 1 and a max skip of 3.

Setting range at 3 – 6 width occupies 59.62% of that 690 draws, a minimum skip of 1 and a maximum skip of 10. That’s more than 50%.

Furthermore

Width

W Times Cur.Skp Av.Skp Math.AvSkp MedianSkip Max skip

0 88 0 7.86 6.9 5 36

1 154 18 4.49 4.12 3 18

2 138 2 5.01 5.21 3 23

3 104 6 6.65 6.8 4 23

4 95 1 7.28 9.26 4 29

5 58 3 11.93 13.33 7 38

6 27 15 25.63 20.83 13 73

7 21 39 32.95 37.04 35 85

8 7 153 98.86 83.33 69 176

9 0 692 0 333.33

Middle-Highest

0 107 3 6.47 6.9 5 22

1 175 4 3.95 4.12 2 22

2 155 1 4.46 5.21 2 24

3 99 11 6.99 6.8 3 26

4 70 14 9.89 9.26 5 52

5 48 0 14.42 13.33 9 62

6 23 33 30.09 20.83 24 129

7 8 63 86.5 37.04 30 256

8 5 54 138.4 83.33 91 228

9 2 17 346 333.33 17 239

Low-Highest

0 7 60 98.86 100 72 203

1 43 4 16.09 18.52 9 89

2 64 10 10.81 10.42 7 49

3 87 8 7.95 7.94 5 32

4 105 2 6.59 6.94 4 33

5 108 0 6.41 6.67 4 26

6 113 1 6.12 6.94 3 30

7 81 5 8.54 7.94 5 32

8 62 15 11.16 14.42 7 53

9 22 17 31.45 18.52 18 112

XX_

0 77 12 8.99 10 5 33

1 119 4 5.82 5.56 3 28

2 115 1 6.02 6.25 3 36

3 98 8 7.06 7.14 4 38

4 80 2 8.65 8.33 5 31

5 86 0 8.05 10 5 34

6 54 15 12.81 12.5 9 53

7 34 39 20.35 16.67 17 109

8 21 24 32.95 25 19 94

9 8 17 86.5 50 55 161

_XX

0 67 0 10.33 10 6 54

1 131 4 5.28 5.56 3 26

2 116 2 5.97 6.25 3 30

3 95 8 7.28 7.14 3 39

4 97 1 7.13 8.33 5 24

5 59 6 11.73 10 8 38

6 61 7 11.34 12.5 6 53

7 32 5 21.63 16.67 13 152

8 27 15 25.63 25 21 62

9 7 85 98.86 50 85 275

X_X

0 58 4 11.93 10 8 63

1 122 7 5.67 5.56 3 19

2 126 2 5.49 6.25 2 37

3 97 6 7.13 7.14 4 28

4 93 12 7.44 8.33 4 33

5 69 0 10.03 10 6 42

6 48 1 14.42 12.5 7 73

7 44 63 15.73 16.67 10 63

8 26 23 26.62 25 14 76

9 9 17 76.89 50 21 224

Stats like that are what I consider beautiful in nature. Coupled with those few HighLows, ODD/EVEN, Sum, LDR’s, Roots, Series2,3,4,5,6, Consecutives/NON, Doubles, Triples and individuals unique way of distinguishing patterns will be significant to our daily pools.

As time permits, I’ll try to look for a deeper way on understanding widths itself, at the moment, I’m entertaining my curiosity of the idea that width is a powerhouse when it comes to filters until proven not profitable/constant displacement in space as the way numbers were drawn on a daily basis.

-Any opinions regarding widths will always be appreciated.

-Maxxx

Hi Maxxx, Try this $string Chart, the concept of width could be intepreted as SUBSETTING the POOL. You play only a section of the pool depending on parameter/s. In this chart the parameter is ' The sequential difference between elements of the DRAWN SET/S. So if I have a draw 258, my seq.dff will be 2-5 (3), 5-8 (3). Now you look out for digit difference 3 and 3 on the chart and form a $string(maintain the positions).So for a draw 258, am playing 3,3 section of the pool corresponding to 3576835768. % data are usually broad, discrete values in random events is optimal(the downside is impatience and discipline).

NB: This is just my approach, you can let your fantasy run, by subsetting the pool (percentiles base on historical data, which I refrain entirely) based on the movement of the POOL elements. You need to come up with a Parameter for your WIDTHS.

digits diff.

strings

0

02819

1

13708

2

246879

3

35768

4

46574

5

57346

6

682435

7

7013924

8

80132

9

0291

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Aug 23, 2013, 6:04 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Aug 23, 2013

Hi Maxxx, Try this $string Chart, the concept of width could be intepreted as SUBSETTING the POOL. You play only a section of the pool depending on parameter/s. In this chart the parameter is ' The sequential difference between elements of the DRAWN SET/S. So if I have a draw 258, my seq.dff will be 2-5 (3), 5-8 (3). Now you look out for digit difference 3 and 3 on the chart and form a $string(maintain the positions).So for a draw 258, am playing 3,3 section of the pool corresponding to 3576835768. % data are usually broad, discrete values in random events is optimal(the downside is impatience and discipline).

NB: This is just my approach, you can let your fantasy run, by subsetting the pool (percentiles base on historical data, which I refrain entirely) based on the movement of the POOL elements. You need to come up with a Parameter for your WIDTHS.

digits diff.	strings
0	02819
1	13708
2	246879
3	35768
4	46574
5	57346
6	682435
7	7013924
8	80132
9	0291

Lets use IL data to illustrate subsetting by $strings:

IL data

Drawing Date	Pick 3		Pick 4
Drawing Date	Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Fri, Aug 23, 2013	5-2-5	5-6-0-1
Thu, Aug 22, 2013	4-1-4	7-8-7	1-7-1-2	1-1-0-6
Wed, Aug 21, 2013	9-8-1	1-4-4	9-1-3-5	0-9-2-4
Tue, Aug 20, 2013	1-8-8	9-3-1	7-3-9-4	2-7-4-5
Mon, Aug 19, 2013	0-7-0	7-5-9	8-4-3-6	0-3-2-9
Sun, Aug 18, 2013	9-2-3	1-1-9	9-1-7-0	6-7-8-5
Sat, Aug 17, 2013	8-2-2	9-6-0	3-1-3-3	5-6-0-6
Fri, Aug 16, 2013	2-7-9	5-7-3	7-9-5-5	3-6-0-0
Thu, Aug 15, 2013	9-3-5	9-1-7	2-4-7-9	1-2-1-9
Wed, Aug 14, 2013	0-6-5	6-0-5	3-4-1-6	8-3-8-7

Lets start with Combined draws of date 8/14:

065 > dff between digits is 6 and 1 for $string 68243513708 > filter by sequent draws 935,279> 684108> further by 822 > 6410 > by next 923 and 070 > Base 641

605 > diff btw digits 6, 5 >string 68243557346 >filter by nxt draw/s 917,573 >682446 by 960, 119> Base picks 8244.

P4> draw 3416 > diff > 1-3-5 >137083576857346 > filter 2479,7955 >130836836> Base 13086

NB: Base picks are more discrete values than broad percentiles, check positions of Base elements in initial $String in final selection.

Maxxx

Cebu City
Philippines
Member #143,410
June 2, 2013
26 Posts
Offline

Aug 25, 2013, 3:23 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Aug 23, 2013

Lets use IL data to illustrate subsetting by $strings:

IL data

Drawing Date	Pick 3		Pick 4
Drawing Date	Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Fri, Aug 23, 2013	5-2-5	5-6-0-1
Thu, Aug 22, 2013	4-1-4	7-8-7	1-7-1-2	1-1-0-6
Wed, Aug 21, 2013	9-8-1	1-4-4	9-1-3-5	0-9-2-4
Tue, Aug 20, 2013	1-8-8	9-3-1	7-3-9-4	2-7-4-5
Mon, Aug 19, 2013	0-7-0	7-5-9	8-4-3-6	0-3-2-9
Sun, Aug 18, 2013	9-2-3	1-1-9	9-1-7-0	6-7-8-5
Sat, Aug 17, 2013	8-2-2	9-6-0	3-1-3-3	5-6-0-6
Fri, Aug 16, 2013	2-7-9	5-7-3	7-9-5-5	3-6-0-0
Thu, Aug 15, 2013	9-3-5	9-1-7	2-4-7-9	1-2-1-9
Wed, Aug 14, 2013	0-6-5	6-0-5	3-4-1-6	8-3-8-7

Lets start with Combined draws of date 8/14:

065 > dff between digits is 6 and 1 for $string 68243513708 > filter by sequent draws 935,279> 684108> further by 822 > 6410 > by next 923 and 070 > Base 641

605 > diff btw digits 6, 5 >string 68243557346 >filter by nxt draw/s 917,573 >682446 by 960, 119> Base picks 8244.

P4> draw 3416 > diff > 1-3-5 >137083576857346 > filter 2479,7955 >130836836> Base 13086

NB: Base picks are more discrete values than broad percentiles, check positions of Base elements in initial $String in final selection.

Its good to hear from you adobea

"digit difference 3 and 3 on the chart and form a $string(maintain the positions).So for a draw 258, am playing 3,3 section of the pool corresponding to 3576835768. % data are usually broad, discrete values in random events is optimal(the downside is impatience and discipline)."

Wish i could elaborate more data's that way haha, anyway kudos on your strings I always take a good look at them before my final picks..

They're designed to hit provided by that base and that strings are used the way I use widths. Similar but different. I'll take a good look at them after a few breaks and compare their similarities regrding width. Been busy lately.

I'll will be posting my widths on a new post. Im done with them and their beatiful. Im planning to have a new nightmare. Pick 4..

--Maxxx

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Talk about W-I-D-T-H-SPrev TopicNext Topic

Talk about W-I-D-T-H-SPrev Topic Next Topic