Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 20, 2017, 5:13 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Formula for probable recurrent points for lottery/lotto

Topic closed. 25 replies. Last post 3 years ago by adobea78.

Page 1 of 2
53
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar

United States
Member #116344
September 8, 2011
3941 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 9, 2013, 8:46 pm - IP Logged

This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term'  in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation.  I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s  since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has  a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls),  lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x  is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

X1 and X2 assumes  the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

Now lets plug in some numbers using  assumed cash 5 draw  > 1-22-34-15-20:

X1=1, X2=22

[(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

X1=22, X2=34

[(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

X1=34,X2=15, N=39

[(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

X1=15, X2=20, N=39

[(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

Picks>

1,3,38

12,14,27,29

19,21,20,22

5,7,34,36

This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

    Avatar

    United States
    Member #116344
    September 8, 2011
    3941 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 9, 2013, 9:28 pm - IP Logged

    This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term'  in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation.  I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s  since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

    Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has  a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls),  lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x  is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

    X1 and X2 assumes  the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

    Now lets plug in some numbers using  assumed cash 5 draw  > 1-22-34-15-20:

    X1=1, X2=22

    [(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

    X1=22, X2=34

    [(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

    X1=34,X2=15, N=39

    [(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

    X1=15, X2=20, N=39

    [(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

    Picks>

    1,3,38

    12,14,27,29

    19,21,20,22

    5,7,34,36

    This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

    Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

    Let's use ONE draw State like Wisconsin to test the formula.

    Pick 3Pick 4
    MiddayEveningMiddayEvening
    Sat, Nov 9, 20133-4-57-1-3-8
    Fri, Nov 8, 20130-9-87-0-2-8
    Thu, Nov 7, 20130-6-85-4-8-0
    Wed, Nov 6, 20131-8-47-4-3-9
    Tue, Nov 5, 20136-4-34-4-9-8
    Mon, Nov 4, 20137-5-41-9-0-9
    Sun, Nov 3, 20139-2-37-8-3-1
    Sat, Nov 2, 20130-2-47-0-5-3
    Fri, Nov 1, 20135-7-38-3-9-4
    Thu, Oct 31, 20134-2-14-8-0-2

    Plug in draw variables:

    4-2-1> 2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

    5-7-3>2,4,7,9,4,6,5,7>2479-4657

    0,2,4>2,4,7,9,2,4,7,9>2479-2479

    9,2,3>7,9,2,4,1,3,8,0>7924-1380

    7,5,4>2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

    Do you see any pattern evolving after x sets of draws? 2479

    Now observe the above data, working on one set at time, be mindful this a target wage!

    Plug in variables:

    4-8-0-2> 4657-8013-2479

    8-3-9-4> 5746-6835-5746

    7-0-5-3>7924-5746-2479

    7-8-3-1>1380-5746-2479

    Do you see any Pattern evolving? 4657-2479

      Avatar

      United States
      Member #116344
      September 8, 2011
      3941 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 9, 2013, 10:02 pm - IP Logged

      Let's use ONE draw State like Wisconsin to test the formula.

      Pick 3Pick 4
      MiddayEveningMiddayEvening
      Sat, Nov 9, 20133-4-57-1-3-8
      Fri, Nov 8, 20130-9-87-0-2-8
      Thu, Nov 7, 20130-6-85-4-8-0
      Wed, Nov 6, 20131-8-47-4-3-9
      Tue, Nov 5, 20136-4-34-4-9-8
      Mon, Nov 4, 20137-5-41-9-0-9
      Sun, Nov 3, 20139-2-37-8-3-1
      Sat, Nov 2, 20130-2-47-0-5-3
      Fri, Nov 1, 20135-7-38-3-9-4
      Thu, Oct 31, 20134-2-14-8-0-2

      Plug in draw variables:

      4-2-1> 2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

      5-7-3>2,4,7,9,4,6,5,7>2479-4657

      0,2,4>2,4,7,9,2,4,7,9>2479-2479

      9,2,3>7,9,2,4,1,3,8,0>7924-1380

      7,5,4>2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

      Do you see any pattern evolving after x sets of draws? 2479

      Now observe the above data, working on one set at time, be mindful this a target wage!

      Plug in variables:

      4-8-0-2> 4657-8013-2479

      8-3-9-4> 5746-6835-5746

      7-0-5-3>7924-5746-2479

      7-8-3-1>1380-5746-2479

      Do you see any Pattern evolving? 4657-2479

      Let s take one set at time and just filter via next draw,note your Remnant for your x

      421 >2479-1380 fiter by 573> 24x9-1x80(Remnant 53,57

      Picks 24x,29x,18x10x, where x=5>3>7

       

      573>2479-4657 filter by 024>xx79-x657(remnant 0,02)Picks x79-65x-67x-57x

      024>2479>filter923>x47(Remnant 3)picks x47

      Remnant is simplist way of digit anaylsis without charts, is on going during workout, after

      three workout my remnants are 5,3,5,7,0,0,2,3, and most of the time your elusive x is the

      remnant

        Avatar

        United States
        Member #116344
        September 8, 2011
        3941 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 9, 2013, 10:38 pm - IP Logged

        Let s take one set at time and just filter via next draw,note your Remnant for your x

        421 >2479-1380 fiter by 573> 24x9-1x80(Remnant 53,57

        Picks 24x,29x,18x10x, where x=5>3>7

         

        573>2479-4657 filter by 024>xx79-x657(remnant 0,02)Picks x79-65x-67x-57x

        024>2479>filter923>x47(Remnant 3)picks x47

        Remnant is simplist way of digit anaylsis without charts, is on going during workout, after

        three workout my remnants are 5,3,5,7,0,0,2,3, and most of the time your elusive x is the

        remnant

        Since the assumption of the formula is linear in dimension, your picks should follow such dimension, this take care of positional picks most of the  time. let's take above draw(see text) set 421 >2479-1380, convert it to a three set format>

        247

        913

        80

        filter by 573

        24x

        91x

        80x

          Avatar

          United States
          Member #116344
          September 8, 2011
          3941 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 11, 2013, 3:34 pm - IP Logged

          This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term'  in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation.  I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s  since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

          Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has  a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls),  lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x  is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

          X1 and X2 assumes  the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

          Now lets plug in some numbers using  assumed cash 5 draw  > 1-22-34-15-20:

          X1=1, X2=22

          [(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

          X1=22, X2=34

          [(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

          X1=34,X2=15, N=39

          [(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

          X1=15, X2=20, N=39

          [(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

          Picks>

          1,3,38

          12,14,27,29

          19,21,20,22

          5,7,34,36

          This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

          Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

          The best way to use the formula is to convert the results in  $STRING, eg. if my draw set is 338 my end picks will be 0,2,9,1-5,7,4,6 >$string 02915746, now you have two options of filtering, you can start with draw set or the next set(remember to note the Remnants while filtering).

          NB> Members of string are POSITIONAL.

            Avatar

            United States
            Member #116344
            September 8, 2011
            3941 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 11, 2013, 4:00 pm - IP Logged

            The best way to use the formula is to convert the results in  $STRING, eg. if my draw set is 338 my end picks will be 0,2,9,1-5,7,4,6 >$string 02915746, now you have two options of filtering, you can start with draw set or the next set(remember to note the Remnants while filtering).

            NB> Members of string are POSITIONAL.

            Lets take CT data to illustrate the string workout using formula.

            Pick 3Pick 4
            MiddayEveningMiddayEvening
            Mon, Nov 11, 20138-2-91-2-6-0
            Sun, Nov 10, 20132-8-98-0-17-6-3-83-2-2-9
            Sat, Nov 9, 20134-5-13-0-13-9-5-72-7-4-8
            Fri, Nov 8, 20137-0-21-5-42-3-2-70-3-2-0
            Thu, Nov 7, 20136-6-89-6-22-6-5-22-1-3-1
            Wed, Nov 6, 20138-8-52-5-01-1-4-47-2-6-6
            Tue, Nov 5, 20136-9-37-5-08-3-6-10-3-6-9
            Mon, Nov 4, 20132-9-58-6-41-3-2-35-8-3-2
            Sun, Nov 3, 20137-6-11-9-56-0-2-87-2-9-5
            Sat, Nov 2, 20139-6-02-5-05-9-2-42-7-3-2

            Start with P4, filtering will be combined draws>

            2-7-3-2> 5746-4657-1380>filter by 6058>74-47-13(remnants 0,8,0,8,6,5)

                          74-47-13>filter by 7295>4-4-13(Remnants 2,9,5,2,9,5)

                          4-4-1-3(this is your base to wage.)

            5-9-2-4>4657-7924-2479 >filter by 2732>465-94-49 (Remnants 2,3,3,3)

                         465-94-49 > filter by 6028>45-94-49 (0,2,8)

                        459449

            NB> note the Remnant pattern!

              Lottonomics's avatar - box

              United States
              Member #133657
              October 5, 2012
              82 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:56 pm - IP Logged

              When you say "This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games" Do you mean just testing on paper or with actual numbers purchased and in play?

              I've been doing a similar thing as you with generating smaller "play pools" with promising results on paper, but once the numbers are actually purchased and put into play the constant 3 numbers stop coming.

              It's a curious phenomenon. I play, it stops working, I don't play, it starts working again. I'm just wondering if you have experienced this with your method? I look forward to reading more about it.

                Avatar

                United States
                Member #116344
                September 8, 2011
                3941 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 11, 2013, 7:28 pm - IP Logged

                When you say "This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games" Do you mean just testing on paper or with actual numbers purchased and in play?

                I've been doing a similar thing as you with generating smaller "play pools" with promising results on paper, but once the numbers are actually purchased and put into play the constant 3 numbers stop coming.

                It's a curious phenomenon. I play, it stops working, I don't play, it starts working again. I'm just wondering if you have experienced this with your method? I look forward to reading more about it.

                Backtesting can be biased. Most at times, we turn to work towards a known data, this creates inconsistency.  I suggest you take any 10 draw sets  and do a separate backtest without looking at actual results.

                  bigdaddy's avatar - aviator2 1.jpg
                  BETWEEN OAKRIDGE AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB
                  United States
                  Member #1647
                  June 10, 2003
                  2729 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 11, 2013, 7:54 pm - IP Logged

                  This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term'  in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation.  I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s  since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

                  Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has  a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls),  lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x  is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

                  X1 and X2 assumes  the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

                  Now lets plug in some numbers using  assumed cash 5 draw  > 1-22-34-15-20:

                  X1=1, X2=22

                  [(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

                  X1=22, X2=34

                  [(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

                  X1=34,X2=15, N=39

                  [(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

                  X1=15, X2=20, N=39

                  [(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

                  Picks>

                  1,3,38

                  12,14,27,29

                  19,21,20,22

                  5,7,34,36

                  This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

                  Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

                  X/pi+yyy already accomplishes that

                  Relax,Bigdaddy has your number!!!!!

                  Pi is the way...

                  turning $30 or less into thousands everyday!!

                  here we go steelers ..here we go---------stairway to seven 

                  TIME FOR THE LOMBARDI TROPHY TO  COME  HOME..

                    Avatar

                    United States
                    Member #116344
                    September 8, 2011
                    3941 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 11, 2013, 8:07 pm - IP Logged

                    X/pi+yyy already accomplishes that

                    Elaborate, link will be nice.

                      RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                      mid-Ohio
                      United States
                      Member #9
                      March 24, 2001
                      19900 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 11, 2013, 8:09 pm - IP Logged

                      When you say "This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games" Do you mean just testing on paper or with actual numbers purchased and in play?

                      I've been doing a similar thing as you with generating smaller "play pools" with promising results on paper, but once the numbers are actually purchased and put into play the constant 3 numbers stop coming.

                      It's a curious phenomenon. I play, it stops working, I don't play, it starts working again. I'm just wondering if you have experienced this with your method? I look forward to reading more about it.

                      There no reason what you do on paper shouldn't work the same in reality.  Next time when you're doing it on paper post the results on the prediction board too.  If it works on the prediction board and on paper, chances are it will work in reality.

                       * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                         
                                   Evil Looking       

                        bigdaddy's avatar - aviator2 1.jpg
                        BETWEEN OAKRIDGE AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB
                        United States
                        Member #1647
                        June 10, 2003
                        2729 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 11, 2013, 8:15 pm - IP Logged

                        Look at kolas rings of pi system or search for pi threads..i do something different than most do and am patenting my process

                        Relax,Bigdaddy has your number!!!!!

                        Pi is the way...

                        turning $30 or less into thousands everyday!!

                        here we go steelers ..here we go---------stairway to seven 

                        TIME FOR THE LOMBARDI TROPHY TO  COME  HOME..

                          Avatar

                          United States
                          Member #116344
                          September 8, 2011
                          3941 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 11, 2013, 8:17 pm - IP Logged

                          Look at kolas rings of pi system or search for pi threads..i do something different than most do and am patenting my process

                          Thanks, will take a look.

                            Avatar

                            United States
                            Member #116344
                            September 8, 2011
                            3941 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 11, 2013, 11:16 pm - IP Logged

                            Let's use ONE draw State like Wisconsin to test the formula.

                            Pick 3Pick 4
                            MiddayEveningMiddayEvening
                            Sat, Nov 9, 20133-4-57-1-3-8
                            Fri, Nov 8, 20130-9-87-0-2-8
                            Thu, Nov 7, 20130-6-85-4-8-0
                            Wed, Nov 6, 20131-8-47-4-3-9
                            Tue, Nov 5, 20136-4-34-4-9-8
                            Mon, Nov 4, 20137-5-41-9-0-9
                            Sun, Nov 3, 20139-2-37-8-3-1
                            Sat, Nov 2, 20130-2-47-0-5-3
                            Fri, Nov 1, 20135-7-38-3-9-4
                            Thu, Oct 31, 20134-2-14-8-0-2

                            Plug in draw variables:

                            4-2-1> 2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

                            5-7-3>2,4,7,9,4,6,5,7>2479-4657

                            0,2,4>2,4,7,9,2,4,7,9>2479-2479

                            9,2,3>7,9,2,4,1,3,8,0>7924-1380

                            7,5,4>2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

                            Do you see any pattern evolving after x sets of draws? 2479

                            Now observe the above data, working on one set at time, be mindful this a target wage!

                            Plug in variables:

                            4-8-0-2> 4657-8013-2479

                            8-3-9-4> 5746-6835-5746

                            7-0-5-3>7924-5746-2479

                            7-8-3-1>1380-5746-2479

                            Do you see any Pattern evolving? 4657-2479

                            421>24791380>247-249-241-243-248-240-479-471-473-478-470-791-793-798-790

                                                     913-918-910-912-914-917-138-130-132-134-137-380-382-384-387

                            filter by 573>249-241-248-240-918-910-912-914-

                            filter by 024>918-910(be careful here)

                            573>24794657>247-249-244-246-245-479-474-476-475-477-794-796-795-797-946-945-947

                                                    942-465-467-464-657-652-659

                            filter by 024>796-795-657-659

                            filter by 923>657(be careful)

                             Is all about target wage, get a base by propulsion!

                              Avatar
                              Horwood NL
                              Canada
                              Member #70613
                              February 6, 2009
                              299 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 12, 2013, 8:53 am - IP Logged

                              In your example,X1=1, X2=22, on the first line what happened to "22" ?

                              [(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40