Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 6, 2016, 9:00 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

NEW Pick 3 method that works

Topic closed. 423 replies. Last post 2 years ago by JKTAYLOR1.

Page 7 of 29
414
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #155994
June 5, 2014
497 Posts
Offline
Posted: July 2, 2014, 6:41 pm - IP Logged

Do you have any numbers for the Eve Illinois?.... Thanks

Nothing for Illinois yet. Check back later.


    United States
    Member #110594
    May 8, 2011
    885 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: July 2, 2014, 7:35 pm - IP Logged

    There's reason to believe that the midday number for New York may have a zero in it. So, I've adjusted the list to reflect this.

    New York - new adjusted list

    Boxed sets - Mid 7/2/14

    568 087 759 065 678 157 580 679 689 789 015 591 507 017 895 018 680 791 019 618 906 695 059 675 169 067 079 089 156 160 875 158 167 178 189

    You forgot the 2's. Yesterday the 3's.

    Midday 062.....Lose -$35..Down $-70

    So if you win or  lose tomorrow it's either -25 or -$105.. and you really could be digging  yourself a big hole here. playing 35 combos is way too many to be playing for just a boxed hit. It's a losing proposition.I Agree! Obviously money management was not taken into account here.Just post the system and people could help you out. So far I'm not impressed only for the fact of all those combos just for a boxed hit and still lose.Thud


      United States
      Member #155994
      June 5, 2014
      497 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: July 2, 2014, 8:13 pm - IP Logged

      You forgot the 2's. Yesterday the 3's.

      Midday 062.....Lose -$35..Down $-70

      So if you win or  lose tomorrow it's either -25 or -$105.. and you really could be digging  yourself a big hole here. playing 35 combos is way too many to be playing for just a boxed hit. It's a losing proposition.I Agree! Obviously money management was not taken into account here.Just post the system and people could help you out. So far I'm not impressed only for the fact of all those combos just for a boxed hit and still lose.Thud

       No, I haven't forgot the 3's yesterday or the 2's today. Actually, if we stuck with the original list for today you would be telling me that I forgot the 0's. The original list had the 2's in there. Either way, there are digits excluded.

       Also, I don't know why you were down $35 yesterday. The list for yesterday(i.e. 7/1) was only meant for midday and not eve. I hope you didn't play that same list for both draws. If you did then that's your mistake and you need to own up to it. You should've only been down by $17.50 yesterday for the midday draw. 

       Nevertheless, I did mess up and I need to own up to my own mistake. Admittedly, this new method is not time-tested and did need some tweaks. The list for yesterday was before the tweak and the one for today was after the tweak. Both lists involved different types of mixes of numbers.

       Fortunately, my system is time-tested and is guaranteed to work. If anything, I'll post numbers based on that. But, for now, I remain confident in this new method. That is, until I see otherwise.


        United States
        Member #128790
        June 2, 2012
        5431 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: July 2, 2014, 8:49 pm - IP Logged

        You forgot the 2's. Yesterday the 3's.

        Midday 062.....Lose -$35..Down $-70

        So if you win or  lose tomorrow it's either -25 or -$105.. and you really could be digging  yourself a big hole here. playing 35 combos is way too many to be playing for just a boxed hit. It's a losing proposition.I Agree! Obviously money management was not taken into account here.Just post the system and people could help you out. So far I'm not impressed only for the fact of all those combos just for a boxed hit and still lose.Thud

        Maybe If you just play the combos that have a 6-4-0-1 in them, you'll win everyday.   Green laugh

          reddog's avatar - patch
          Greensboro, North Carolina
          United States
          Member #1616
          June 5, 2003
          1285 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: July 2, 2014, 9:09 pm - IP Logged

           No, I haven't forgot the 3's yesterday or the 2's today. Actually, if we stuck with the original list for today you would be telling me that I forgot the 0's. The original list had the 2's in there. Either way, there are digits excluded.

           Also, I don't know why you were down $35 yesterday. The list for yesterday(i.e. 7/1) was only meant for midday and not eve. I hope you didn't play that same list for both draws. If you did then that's your mistake and you need to own up to it. You should've only been down by $17.50 yesterday for the midday draw. 

           Nevertheless, I did mess up and I need to own up to my own mistake. Admittedly, this new method is not time-tested and did need some tweaks. The list for yesterday was before the tweak and the one for today was after the tweak. Both lists involved different types of mixes of numbers.

           Fortunately, my system is time-tested and is guaranteed to work. If anything, I'll post numbers based on that. But, for now, I remain confident in this new method. That is, until I see otherwise.

          He played $1.00 per # equals $35.00. That is the only way to play and make any profit or loose your a$$ with that many numbers. Playing .50 is not going to cut it with that many numbers.

          And again, for the 3rd time I ask that you post your "method" so we all can work our own state numbers out so we can reduce the amount of numbers to play.

            zennjohn's avatar - DiscoBallGlowing

            United States
            Member #4711
            May 19, 2004
            4227 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: July 2, 2014, 9:17 pm - IP Logged

            He played $1.00 per # equals $35.00. That is the only way to play and make any profit or loose your a$$ with that many numbers. Playing .50 is not going to cut it with that many numbers.

            And again, for the 3rd time I ask that you post your "method" so we all can work our own state numbers out so we can reduce the amount of numbers to play.

            never bite of more than u can chew. NEVER  IN THE SYSTEM FORUM  LOL.

            "Coming together is a Beginning.

            Staying together is a Process.

            Working together is  Success".

            Henry Ford

            Sun Smiley


              United States
              Member #155994
              June 5, 2014
              497 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: July 2, 2014, 9:30 pm - IP Logged

              He played $1.00 per # equals $35.00. That is the only way to play and make any profit or loose your a$$ with that many numbers. Playing .50 is not going to cut it with that many numbers.

              And again, for the 3rd time I ask that you post your "method" so we all can work our own state numbers out so we can reduce the amount of numbers to play.

               Well, that violates the fundamental concept behind playing more numbers and goes against what common sense tells us. Once again ,as already stated, playing more numbers allows us to win more often when we play. Although, you will still lose more often than you win.

               What point is there in playing less numbers if you'll win even less often? Do you prefer to wait longer for each win? Your profit won't be much better. That's because you'd incur more losses. The idea is to cover more key numbers so you'd have a better chance at winning more often when you play.

                reddog's avatar - patch
                Greensboro, North Carolina
                United States
                Member #1616
                June 5, 2003
                1285 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: July 2, 2014, 9:33 pm - IP Logged

                never bite of more than u can chew. NEVER  IN THE SYSTEM FORUM  LOL.

                I am sure Flossdog is not $70.00 in the hole. He is making a point about this "New Pick 3 method that works".


                  United States
                  Member #155994
                  June 5, 2014
                  497 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: July 2, 2014, 9:37 pm - IP Logged

                  I am sure Flossdog is not $70.00 in the hole. He is making a point about this "New Pick 3 method that works".

                   Yeah, I had that feeling. As for myself, I did play.

                    grwurston's avatar - Cute animals_Spider.jpg
                    Winning makes me smile.
                    bel air maryland
                    United States
                    Member #90251
                    April 24, 2010
                    4866 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: July 2, 2014, 10:06 pm - IP Logged

                     Yeah, I had that feeling. As for myself, I did play.

                    Pick3Guy,  Nobody wins every day, we all know that. If you think your new method will pan out, then go for it.  Since you already said this new method hasn't been time tested, there is no reason for anyone to get upset  if they don't hit. JMO.  Good Luck with it!!!

                    "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra, Hall of Fame baseball player.

                    The numbers will tell you what numbers to play. Pay attention to the numbers.

                    Don't just think outside the box, crush it.


                      United States
                      Member #110594
                      May 8, 2011
                      885 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: July 2, 2014, 10:10 pm - IP Logged

                      I am sure Flossdog is not $70.00 in the hole. He is making a point about this "New Pick 3 method that works".

                      You're right, from one dog to another I did not play. I was making a point. And yes I agree, why would you play .50 a number to win a few dollars? Like $22.50? C'mon. Right now on paper it's losing.No Nod I will challenge you that I can play 1/3 of those picks and win more often. If you lose more than you win you would have to be a knucklehead to keep on playing. Pick3guy shows us your method or scrap your picks. You have failed to show a profit. I will stick with MegaMoney's suggestion and go 6-4-0-1. May the code be with you.  Ok here are my picks for midday NY tomorrow.

                      435-485-085-543-533-359-558-598-339-889-508-588-859-553-053-984

                        Avatar
                        dover delaware
                        United States
                        Member #4466
                        April 26, 2004
                        1191 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: July 2, 2014, 10:15 pm - IP Logged

                        anything for delaware???  ty today we had 402 and 116   im looking for trips they are overdue   ty lesonook


                          United States
                          Member #155994
                          June 5, 2014
                          497 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: July 2, 2014, 11:03 pm - IP Logged

                          Pick3Guy,  Nobody wins every day, we all know that. If you think your new method will pan out, then go for it.  Since you already said this new method hasn't been time tested, there is no reason for anyone to get upset  if they don't hit. JMO.  Good Luck with it!!!

                           Thanks for the encouragement, grwurston. Well, it's their choice if they decide to use it. But, so far, it looks promising. We'll see how it goes.

                            Avatar

                            United States
                            Member #116344
                            September 8, 2011
                            3927 Posts
                            Online
                            Posted: July 2, 2014, 11:04 pm - IP Logged

                             Well, that violates the fundamental concept behind playing more numbers and goes against what common sense tells us. Once again ,as already stated, playing more numbers allows us to win more often when we play. Although, you will still lose more often than you win.

                             What point is there in playing less numbers if you'll win even less often? Do you prefer to wait longer for each win? Your profit won't be much better. That's because you'd incur more losses. The idea is to cover more key numbers so you'd have a better chance at winning more often when you play.

                            'violates the fundamental concept behind playing more numbers'-laws of lager numbers is mostly for data inference, not for prediction!

                            Why do you select large picks? too many ifs> ifs are conditional>a sign of uncertainty> low level of confidence>Hence box bet> which is loosing by default>The intent of PRIZE TAG


                              United States
                              Member #155994
                              June 5, 2014
                              497 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: July 2, 2014, 11:13 pm - IP Logged

                              You're right, from one dog to another I did not play. I was making a point. And yes I agree, why would you play .50 a number to win a few dollars? Like $22.50? C'mon. Right now on paper it's losing.No Nod I will challenge you that I can play 1/3 of those picks and win more often. If you lose more than you win you would have to be a knucklehead to keep on playing. Pick3guy shows us your method or scrap your picks. You have failed to show a profit. I will stick with MegaMoney's suggestion and go 6-4-0-1. May the code be with you.  Ok here are my picks for midday NY tomorrow.

                              435-485-085-543-533-359-558-598-339-889-508-588-859-553-053-984

                               Well, I have to give you credit for admitting that you didn't play. Are you sure you want to challenge me on this? That's a bold move on your behalf. What if you're wrong? Btw, there's a reason why that's not a good selection of numbers. But, I can let you know why after the challenge is over. Good Luck!!

                                 
                                Page 7 of 29