Welcome Guest
You last visited December 11, 2016, 5:30 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Indiana Daily 3 System

Topic closed. 7 replies. Last post 2 years ago by lakerben.

 Page 1 of 1
New Member
Indianaplois, Indiana
United States
Member #158627
August 29, 2014
3 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 29, 2014, 10:32 am - IP Logged

INDIANA DAILY 3 HISTORICAL DATA WITH [78-89] PAIRINGS [JAN-AUG 2014]

PLAYED PAIRINGS AND VARIABLES AS OF [08/28/2014]

[78]  [89]  [VAR]

587   298   123
784   869   132
738   589   231
876   689   231
758   849   213
784   982   312
768   984   231
748   829   132
287   598   231
578   839   231
784   298   213
837   859   132
784   978   213
786   198   312
587   489
784
978
785
781

PLAYED TOTALS

Note: Variable picks are determined from the most recent date,
going back until all 6 variables have played at least once.

[78]     [89]     [VAR]

078-0  089-0  123-1
178-1  189-1  132-3
278-1  289-4  213-3
378-2  389-1  231-5
478-6  489-2  312-1
578-5  589-3  321-1
678-3  689-2
789-1  789-1

LOW FREQUENCY PICKS

[78]   [89]   [VAR]

078    089    123
178    189    312
278    389    321

TOTAL PICKED NUMBERS WITH VARIABLES [18]

078,807,870,178,817,871,278,827,872
089,908,980,189,918,981,289,829,892

MY PRACTICAL STRATEGY

Play the picked numbers straight for .50 daily.
18 numbers divided by .50 bets equals \$9 daily.
\$9 divided into a \$250 dollar possible win equals 28 days to hit.

NOTES

This system is based entirely upon the law of probability, as applied
to the picked low frequency numbers and variables up to the present date.

After studying the Indiana Daily 3 for 5 years, I have surmised that the
"pairing system" in accordance with the probability law, is perhaps the
most practical approach in terms of money spent and a possible winning
strategy. I say possible, because there are no absolutes in terms of
lottery system strategies. Anyone pitching a claim, stating that they have
an absolute winning system with the intent to sell you a book, should send
up a red flag. "Warning Will Robinson, warning!" Think about it, if they
had an absolute winning system, then why would they need to sell a book?

While tallying up pairings from a 5 year pool of the Indiana Daily 3,
I had discovered that the frequency of what I coined "Kin Numbers" that
is numbers that are paired side to side, i.e. 01,12,23,34,45,56,67,78,89
so far, has held the highest overall frequency. Theoretically, this is
likely due to the fact that any 2 numbers can fall on either side of any
1 single number. The pairs 78 and 89 are amongst the highest pairs to date.
Therefore, I have chosen to play these 2 pairs together rather than just 1,
as this significantly increases the possible winning chances as a result
of the central root number being 8, with the numbers 7 and 9 falling on
either side of the 8. This method can in turn be applied to any 2 chosen
high frequency kin number pairings.

Now of course, due to the "random factor" which is the nemesis of all lottery
systems, other kin number pairs can and will pervade at some point. But there
is an upside to this, in that these random trends of high frequency pairs can
be promising leads of which to follow.

Concerning frequencies; as any lottery student knows, there are high and low
periods with any system. It is during the high frequency periods that one may
reap a profit, or at the least, possibly collect on their losses. However, much
like investing in the stock market, determining when a certain high frequency
period has reached it's supposed end is indeed problematic. This not only requires
some of math, but perhaps a certain level of intuition as well. I would suggest
that the wise decision at this point, in order to avoid a loss, is to switch to
what appears to be newly pervading higher frequency numbers.

For those of you who are interested in following the progress my Kin Number pairing
system strategy, I will be updating this page periodically, so check back.

*A nod to the administrators of the Lottery Post in maintaining this excellent site.

Peace out, Sean. (aka LotteryGeek)

New Mexico
United States
Member #86099
January 29, 2010
11120 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 29, 2014, 10:43 am - IP Logged

INDIANA DAILY 3 HISTORICAL DATA WITH [78-89] PAIRINGS [JAN-AUG 2014]

PLAYED PAIRINGS AND VARIABLES AS OF [08/28/2014]

[78]  [89]  [VAR]

587   298   123
784   869   132
738   589   231
876   689   231
758   849   213
784   982   312
768   984   231
748   829   132
287   598   231
578   839   231
784   298   213
837   859   132
784   978   213
786   198   312
587   489
784
978
785
781

PLAYED TOTALS

Note: Variable picks are determined from the most recent date,
going back until all 6 variables have played at least once.

[78]     [89]     [VAR]

078-0  089-0  123-1
178-1  189-1  132-3
278-1  289-4  213-3
378-2  389-1  231-5
478-6  489-2  312-1
578-5  589-3  321-1
678-3  689-2
789-1  789-1

LOW FREQUENCY PICKS

[78]   [89]   [VAR]

078    089    123
178    189    312
278    389    321

TOTAL PICKED NUMBERS WITH VARIABLES [18]

078,807,870,178,817,871,278,827,872
089,908,980,189,918,981,289,829,892

MY PRACTICAL STRATEGY

Play the picked numbers straight for .50 daily.
18 numbers divided by .50 bets equals \$9 daily.
\$9 divided into a \$250 dollar possible win equals 28 days to hit.

NOTES

This system is based entirely upon the law of probability, as applied
to the picked low frequency numbers and variables up to the present date.

After studying the Indiana Daily 3 for 5 years, I have surmised that the
"pairing system" in accordance with the probability law, is perhaps the
most practical approach in terms of money spent and a possible winning
strategy. I say possible, because there are no absolutes in terms of
lottery system strategies. Anyone pitching a claim, stating that they have
an absolute winning system with the intent to sell you a book, should send
up a red flag. "Warning Will Robinson, warning!" Think about it, if they
had an absolute winning system, then why would they need to sell a book?

While tallying up pairings from a 5 year pool of the Indiana Daily 3,
I had discovered that the frequency of what I coined "Kin Numbers" that
is numbers that are paired side to side, i.e. 01,12,23,34,45,56,67,78,89
so far, has held the highest overall frequency. Theoretically, this is
likely due to the fact that any 2 numbers can fall on either side of any
1 single number. The pairs 78 and 89 are amongst the highest pairs to date.
Therefore, I have chosen to play these 2 pairs together rather than just 1,
as this significantly increases the possible winning chances as a result
of the central root number being 8, with the numbers 7 and 9 falling on
either side of the 8. This method can in turn be applied to any 2 chosen
high frequency kin number pairings.

Now of course, due to the "random factor" which is the nemesis of all lottery
systems, other kin number pairs can and will pervade at some point. But there
is an upside to this, in that these random trends of high frequency pairs can
be promising leads of which to follow.

Concerning frequencies; as any lottery student knows, there are high and low
periods with any system. It is during the high frequency periods that one may
reap a profit, or at the least, possibly collect on their losses. However, much
like investing in the stock market, determining when a certain high frequency
period has reached it's supposed end is indeed problematic. This not only requires
some of math, but perhaps a certain level of intuition as well. I would suggest
that the wise decision at this point, in order to avoid a loss, is to switch to
what appears to be newly pervading higher frequency numbers.

For those of you who are interested in following the progress my Kin Number pairing
system strategy, I will be updating this page periodically, so check back.

*A nod to the administrators of the Lottery Post in maintaining this excellent site.

Peace out, Sean. (aka LotteryGeek)

Interesting!

Dallas, Texas
United States
Member #4549
May 2, 2004
1739 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 29, 2014, 11:01 am - IP Logged

Good first post Sean!

Welcome to LP where bright people do stupid things with their money. Okay, SOME bright people. Well...maybe just me. But nobody ever called me bright.

I like the term kin numbers too. I use the term consecutive numbers when programming for them.

Also happy to see a state specific thread. Looking forward to reading more.

G

My greatest accomplishment is teaching cats about Vienna Sausage. When I need a friend, all I need do is walk outside, pop open a can, and every little critter in the neighborhood drops by to say "Hi!"

New Member
Indianaplois, Indiana
United States
Member #158627
August 29, 2014
3 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 29, 2014, 11:20 am - IP Logged

Hi Garyo,

Thanks for the kind words. But hopefully, I am not a stupid person attempting to do what I think is a bright thing with my money?!
Quoting the immortal Forest Gump..."Stupid is what stupid does".

For some people, playing the lottery or gambling in general is mainly for the thrill of it, with the possibility of striking gold.
For others, like myself, it's more a mental challenge and alot fun to boot. Not that I wouldn't mind a little extra booty in my purse.

Dallas, Texas
United States
Member #4549
May 2, 2004
1739 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 29, 2014, 11:27 am - IP Logged

Yep! That's what we all are working toward. Lot of good, friendly knowledgeable people here.

As far as doing stupid things, do it anyway! Then laugh about. Guaranteed no matter how stupid it might seem SOMEONE HAS DONE THE SAME THING BEFORE!

For instance right now, I'm working on a program dealing with Texas 2Step. I wrote the blasted thing and don't even know how it works.....

My greatest accomplishment is teaching cats about Vienna Sausage. When I need a friend, all I need do is walk outside, pop open a can, and every little critter in the neighborhood drops by to say "Hi!"

u\$a
United States
Member #106665
February 22, 2011
19911 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 1, 2014, 9:23 am - IP Logged

INDIANA DAILY 3 HISTORICAL DATA WITH [78-89] PAIRINGS [JAN-AUG 2014]

PLAYED PAIRINGS AND VARIABLES AS OF [08/28/2014]

[78]  [89]  [VAR]

587   298   123
784   869   132
738   589   231
876   689   231
758   849   213
784   982   312
768   984   231
748   829   132
287   598   231
578   839   231
784   298   213
837   859   132
784   978   213
786   198   312
587   489
784
978
785
781

PLAYED TOTALS

Note: Variable picks are determined from the most recent date,
going back until all 6 variables have played at least once.

[78]     [89]     [VAR]

078-0  089-0  123-1
178-1  189-1  132-3
278-1  289-4  213-3
378-2  389-1  231-5
478-6  489-2  312-1
578-5  589-3  321-1
678-3  689-2
789-1  789-1

LOW FREQUENCY PICKS

[78]   [89]   [VAR]

078    089    123
178    189    312
278    389    321

TOTAL PICKED NUMBERS WITH VARIABLES [18]

078,807,870,178,817,871,278,827,872
089,908,980,189,918,981,289,829,892

MY PRACTICAL STRATEGY

Play the picked numbers straight for .50 daily.
18 numbers divided by .50 bets equals \$9 daily.
\$9 divided into a \$250 dollar possible win equals 28 days to hit.

NOTES

This system is based entirely upon the law of probability, as applied
to the picked low frequency numbers and variables up to the present date.

After studying the Indiana Daily 3 for 5 years, I have surmised that the
"pairing system" in accordance with the probability law, is perhaps the
most practical approach in terms of money spent and a possible winning
strategy. I say possible, because there are no absolutes in terms of
lottery system strategies. Anyone pitching a claim, stating that they have
an absolute winning system with the intent to sell you a book, should send
up a red flag. "Warning Will Robinson, warning!" Think about it, if they
had an absolute winning system, then why would they need to sell a book?

While tallying up pairings from a 5 year pool of the Indiana Daily 3,
I had discovered that the frequency of what I coined "Kin Numbers" that
is numbers that are paired side to side, i.e. 01,12,23,34,45,56,67,78,89
so far, has held the highest overall frequency. Theoretically, this is
likely due to the fact that any 2 numbers can fall on either side of any
1 single number. The pairs 78 and 89 are amongst the highest pairs to date.
Therefore, I have chosen to play these 2 pairs together rather than just 1,
as this significantly increases the possible winning chances as a result
of the central root number being 8, with the numbers 7 and 9 falling on
either side of the 8. This method can in turn be applied to any 2 chosen
high frequency kin number pairings.

Now of course, due to the "random factor" which is the nemesis of all lottery
systems, other kin number pairs can and will pervade at some point. But there
is an upside to this, in that these random trends of high frequency pairs can
be promising leads of which to follow.

Concerning frequencies; as any lottery student knows, there are high and low
periods with any system. It is during the high frequency periods that one may
reap a profit, or at the least, possibly collect on their losses. However, much
like investing in the stock market, determining when a certain high frequency
period has reached it's supposed end is indeed problematic. This not only requires
some of math, but perhaps a certain level of intuition as well. I would suggest
that the wise decision at this point, in order to avoid a loss, is to switch to
what appears to be newly pervading higher frequency numbers.

For those of you who are interested in following the progress my Kin Number pairing
system strategy, I will be updating this page periodically, so check back.

*A nod to the administrators of the Lottery Post in maintaining this excellent site.

Peace out, Sean. (aka LotteryGeek)

I hope you caught that 876 last night Good Luck to you

Let it Snow

Indianapolis, IN
United States
Member #151842
January 28, 2014
107 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 1, 2014, 2:44 pm - IP Logged

From a fellow Hoosier, I say Thank You!

Think amongst Chaos. Play in Order.

New Mexico
United States
Member #86099
January 29, 2010
11120 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2014, 10:18 am - IP Logged