Economy class Belgium Member #123700 February 27, 2012 4035 Posts Offline

Posted: May 3, 2015, 5:10 am - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on May 2, 2015

Odds and probability has validity in a total normal distribution, take for example the simple flip of a coin> The odds are 50/50, but for a short span data like H H T H T T H H H T H T T T H T H H H T, your best bet is non-parametric sampling which does not rely on probability of distribution, but rather inferential order of variables, you can do this by mere observation. I will rather pick H as my next three events rather than T, though the odds indicates 50/50. Interpretation /perception of Probability and odds in random setting plays trick on the human mind all the time--- Intuition overrides logic in most critical decisions.

Predicting the next digit has no value if the betting condition is not set (EXACT or BOX), even by observation, the statistics tells us a digit returns most of the time, can you quantify the keyword 'most' into a playable and winning strategy.

Again someone responding with a question. YOU are supposed to give the answer! The rule is simple, just one digit.

Economy class Belgium Member #123700 February 27, 2012 4035 Posts Offline

Posted: May 3, 2015, 8:27 am - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on May 3, 2015

Must be a trick question, my first response would be No as there is no way to predict with any certainty that

any digit will show once out of every 10 let alone 2 out of 3. There are 10*9*8=720 single digit lines. There

are 81 lines for each position for which a single digit can be drawn without a double or triple showing for the

predicted digit. This means that the odds are 1 in (1000 / 243) or =1 in 4.115 for a single game mathematically.

On the other hand I can pinpoint a digit that is good for any position 3 out of 3 games with 100% certainty since

it is not specified that the digit is required to show but since the digit can only be good for 2 out of 3 games then

the answer is also NO because all 10 digits should be considered good for any position.

If there is a method to predict or pin-point a digit that will show 2 out of every 3 games then I would very much

like to know how to select it.

RL

It is not a trick question. Just one digit is asked for one bet. One boxed key number, if you want to call it like that.

If you can get the digit 3 out of 3 that covers 2 out of 3 for me. If you announce three digits and two of them are drawn for one predicted drawing, that is also fine for me. I gave the correct odds above. I gave the rules for the challenge. The player has the right to skip plays, not playing is not betting and not losing.

Again someone responding with a question. YOU are supposed to give the answer! The rule is simple, just one digit.

You pose a question for 'yes or no' answer, isn't ironical when you quote odds and probability, lots of nuances in any random setting, my answer was ' a digit returns' most of the times, but am ' suppose to give the answer'!

San Angelo, Texas United States Member #1097 January 31, 2003 1452 Posts Offline

Posted: May 3, 2015, 11:43 am - IP Logged

The winning combination for the May 2 Texas Pick 3 Night Drawing is '820' In my substitution workout, the Alpha Signature is 'CAR' My analysis of appropriate trend lines in several tracking charts, and additional processing, suggested I use Alpha Signature 'ACR' to guide my lottery digit selections. Other tracking charts, and processing, suggested the best lottery digits to play were '380' I had two hits and missed the third by one. Had I been generating combinations for actual play, I would have no doubt played 180, 280 and 380, giving a Box win. Why did I choose '2'?? In my workout, I have three trend lines that aid the selection of best lottery digits. In this instance, the Star Chart had too many possibilities. The primary Follower trend line wasn't very strong for either digit. So, I went to the third choice - another Follower trend line, that clearly indicated '3' was the best choice. That's the way it goes with guesswork - sometimes you hit, sometime you miss!!

Here is my third challenge choice for May 4 Texas Pick 3 Morning drawing;

Combination - '397/ACC'

Because the last Alpha Signature was a 'Single', there is no change in the Alpha Double trend lines. Therefore, I'll stick with my previous analysis indicating the double will be a Double C. Referring to what I call 'Rap Sheets', there are 10 possible Alpha Signatures with an Alpha C, including 'CCC' A trend line associated with the chart suggests that the second letter in the Alpha Signature could be 'A', which presented 4 possibilities. I evaluated the Star Chart for these possibilities and decided that 'ACC' would be best choice for a Straight win.

Other comments. I don't view the challenge as a 'trick' question because I'm choosing 2 out of 3, or 2 out of 4, digits every time I use my workout to play a pick 3/4 game. It's routine stuff for me. Finding the correct answer to multiple What's Next questions is by no means an easy chore. I have created numerous tracking charts to guide my selections. Andmy confidence that I can make the right choices grows every time I use the workout, although I'm not winning as often as I would like. I'm flying solo here. I wish I had a few contributors but I've more or less given up on the thought that others are willing to try something original, new and different. I decided that trying to manage 10 digits at once just wasn't worthwhile, as 25 or more years of failed lottery workout history clearly shows. Instead, I break the game into 3 major parts, with each part having multiple tracking trend lines contributing to the total selection package. Therefore, all the odds, percentages and other factors being stressed here and elsewhere pertaining to traditional workouts have no meaning to my way of generating combinations for play. I don't believe there is a mathematical solution, as many so-called experts stress. I rely on my interpretive abilities, pure and simple. The odds of this or that happening doesn't apply.

Question: Am I the only one willing to step up and demonstrate a technique that can give good answers to the challenge question??

United States Member #116344 September 8, 2011 4017 Posts Offline

Posted: May 3, 2015, 3:04 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by bobby623 on May 3, 2015

The winning combination for the May 2 Texas Pick 3 Night Drawing is '820' In my substitution workout, the Alpha Signature is 'CAR' My analysis of appropriate trend lines in several tracking charts, and additional processing, suggested I use Alpha Signature 'ACR' to guide my lottery digit selections. Other tracking charts, and processing, suggested the best lottery digits to play were '380' I had two hits and missed the third by one. Had I been generating combinations for actual play, I would have no doubt played 180, 280 and 380, giving a Box win. Why did I choose '2'?? In my workout, I have three trend lines that aid the selection of best lottery digits. In this instance, the Star Chart had too many possibilities. The primary Follower trend line wasn't very strong for either digit. So, I went to the third choice - another Follower trend line, that clearly indicated '3' was the best choice. That's the way it goes with guesswork - sometimes you hit, sometime you miss!!

Here is my third challenge choice for May 4 Texas Pick 3 Morning drawing;

Combination - '397/ACC'

Because the last Alpha Signature was a 'Single', there is no change in the Alpha Double trend lines. Therefore, I'll stick with my previous analysis indicating the double will be a Double C. Referring to what I call 'Rap Sheets', there are 10 possible Alpha Signatures with an Alpha C, including 'CCC' A trend line associated with the chart suggests that the second letter in the Alpha Signature could be 'A', which presented 4 possibilities. I evaluated the Star Chart for these possibilities and decided that 'ACC' would be best choice for a Straight win.

Other comments. I don't view the challenge as a 'trick' question because I'm choosing 2 out of 3, or 2 out of 4, digits every time I use my workout to play a pick 3/4 game. It's routine stuff for me. Finding the correct answer to multiple What's Next questions is by no means an easy chore. I have created numerous tracking charts to guide my selections. Andmy confidence that I can make the right choices grows every time I use the workout, although I'm not winning as often as I would like. I'm flying solo here. I wish I had a few contributors but I've more or less given up on the thought that others are willing to try something original, new and different. I decided that trying to manage 10 digits at once just wasn't worthwhile, as 25 or more years of failed lottery workout history clearly shows. Instead, I break the game into 3 major parts, with each part having multiple tracking trend lines contributing to the total selection package. Therefore, all the odds, percentages and other factors being stressed here and elsewhere pertaining to traditional workouts have no meaning to my way of generating combinations for play. I don't believe there is a mathematical solution, as many so-called experts stress. I rely on my interpretive abilities, pure and simple. The odds of this or that happening doesn't apply.

Question: Am I the only one willing to step up and demonstrate a technique that can give good answers to the challenge question??

Enhance your chart with non-parametric sampling where probability of distribution is not considered

NB> every draw generates a data by non-parametric sampling, with which the next pair can be located and control for str8 hits, no probability assumed here, the baseline and your waging strategy is all that matters.

Google data sampling and focus more on non-parametric sampling, am just throwing 'a bone', I like your approach.

NB> every draw generates a data by non-parametric sampling, with which the next pair can be located and control for str8 hits, no probability assumed here, the baseline and your waging strategy is all that matters.

Google data sampling and focus more on non-parametric sampling, am just throwing 'a bone', I like your approach.

6689 10828047 108247 689 10247 0412(could be 7451,4402 depends)

8141 80276390 8027639 814 027639 6325,0391

lets break 8141 baseline workout> filtering 8141,6325 will leave 0079(see data trend) for hit 0990 or pair 07-09 for 5k hit considering 10P4 format with front 07-09. Try to break draw 6689 baseline 10247 with 8141>10247 filter 8141> remains 027> for front pairs 02-07 for str8 hit 0295 after 17 draws (waging is personal, the pairs has equal chance starting with 02).

6325>58274679 5827469 6325 8749 hit 9794 or 3779 (consider data trend 87479).

NB>Generating data this way, you ride with random and make decision at baseline, leaving decision at baseline to a software program is counter intuitive.

Economy class Belgium Member #123700 February 27, 2012 4035 Posts Offline

Posted: May 3, 2015, 3:36 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on May 3, 2015

You pose a question for 'yes or no' answer, isn't ironical when you quote odds and probability, lots of nuances in any random setting, my answer was ' a digit returns' most of the times, but am ' suppose to give the answer'!

You proposed to play a digit that repeated, if I remember well from above.

Repetitions happen, you didn't specify which one when. Basically you wrote nothing.

Then you made allusion to sequences of head or tail, not even comparing to pick 3 with 10 digits.

You proposed to play a digit that repeated, if I remember well from above.

Repetitions happen, you didn't specify which one when. Basically you wrote nothing.

Then you made allusion to sequences of head or tail, not even comparing to pick 3 with 10 digits.

Isn't that ironical?

Basically you wrote nothing.

You talk about odds and probability, so my allusion to flipping of a coin is more than valid for any lottery matrix. I did propose a digit repeating from the view point of those into odds and probability, my approach is non-parametric sampling, this gives your a clear pair most of the time. Most times, we're entrenched in our ideals that dialogue is impossible.You started this thread for open discussion, I presumed, it seems you know the answer to your question !

Economy class Belgium Member #123700 February 27, 2012 4035 Posts Offline

Posted: May 4, 2015, 10:13 am - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on May 3, 2015

Basically you wrote nothing.

You talk about odds and probability, so my allusion to flipping of a coin is more than valid for any lottery matrix. I did propose a digit repeating from the view point of those into odds and probability, my approach is non-parametric sampling, this gives your a clear pair most of the time. Most times, we're entrenched in our ideals that dialogue is impossible.You started this thread for open discussion, I presumed, it seems you know the answer to your question !

I have no problems with verifying by using software and by using mathematics. In so far, you can say that I have that answer. It is not about odds, it is about net payout.

The point is to win the game beating the odds by more than twice and the simplest of all approaches is to guess a number correctly. It does require high skill of play, so it is to be worked out.

A pair is a boxed combination of two numbers. A pair can also be a straight pair. Which one is it? You still must beat the odds more than twice. Most of the time there is a repetition, true, but you obviously don't try to find which one. Following that statement you lose again.