Actually, it seems so far, that if you choose a couple of BestMatch combinations, you can lower your "game cost" a bit, even statistically noticeably.
For example
I've taken data from the 6 from 45 lottery, chosen a couple of Best Match combinations with the following parameters:
Check Last Draw Results -- 100
Numbers in Combinations -- exactly 6 (!)
Match Range -- 2 to 6
Skip last -- 0
Then I use Execute Match Search II, which provides me 1000 or 10000 combinations.
And then I sort them by TotalMatch, paying maximum attention to Match2 and Match3.
Some of the top combinations (see Example attached) have probability 1/3 or higher to return it's cost ( which is not the true for a random 6-numbers combination, where it is equal to 0.1515, if i'm not mistaken), also two best combinations don't have intersections.
For the last 5-7 days as I'm using this strategy I'm around ZERO game cost (slightly negative maybe, as i was randomly playing some stupid tickets a couple of times) at 3 lotteries (6 from 45, 4 from 20, 8 from 20+1). I find this fact pretty remarkable . That means that all my jackpot attempts during this period of time were free for me
Usually I play with abbreviated wheels and the only problem I have is to choose the number pool to construct my precious wheel.
I'm at steady plus during all my lottery career with some nice $4000 wins. But I hope I will find a way to use this tool to estimate the pool more correctly and to catch a more delicious fish .