Quote: Originally posted by osmannica2001 on Aug 26, 2017
The idea of machine learning is to help you decrease the marginal error with respect to an output of events given the likelihood of another event occurring. The law of average indicates that the principle that supposes most future events are likely to balance any past deviation from a presumed average - something that machine learning allows to visualize easier, rather than manually filling pages and pages of manual statistical calculations.
In my subjective opinion, Randomness doesn't exist. For instance, scientists predicting that other Life than that found in Earth may be extinct in other areas of the universe, doesn't necessarily mean that this is True. Their answer is simply based on outputs from complex calculations that they perform based on existent data. Because Infinity exists, they are far from finding a true event, perhaps because our capabilities are not there yet (although not quite far from Quantum capabilities, which indicate that a group of sub atomic particles can be sitting here in Earth, the others a quintillion of miles way, yet still be fully connected to one another, this phenomena is called; quantum entanglement). Same with lottery - we're still limited with the amount of data that we have in our hands, more yet, limited with the storage available to store insane amounts of data.
That being said, truly predicting lottery?, yes may be difficult!, but its just a matter of finding events/patterns that are hidden in the chaos of numbers which may lower the probabilities of reaching a winning number. I can't stress enough the fact that randomness doesn't exist without lottery officials purposely manipulating their machines and so called ball sets. You're correct that this is not a tool to 100% correctly predict your next drawing of numbers, but not because the algorithm is not capable of doing so, rather because your numbers may come out when lottery officials are "testing" their machines - thereby the time the game is presented in Live TV, those are no longer your numbers.
Bayes theorem states that you have better/higher chances of finding the true outcome of an event provided evidence of prior events. A judge can fully condemn a criminal Only based on evidence that a criminal act was performed by that individual. This being the case, yes, winning numbers can be predicted, but only after collecting evidence of multiple events that occur that may decrease the probabilities of winning, and then, possibly applying combinatorial calculations to your final output.
It's all a matter of creating the right algorithm to your problem - at the end you may end up having multiple tools to help achieve your goal. I wish I could share all my algorithms, but because I'm still in the process of working in more findings, and until I Win, For Now this tool should be enough.