Ok, I'll bite.
Position strategies are my cup of tea and my bottle of rum. Let's go over this step by step. I kind of feel like Obama's anger translator. I think I've got it but I just want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly and help others who may be having a hard time understanding as well.
At first, this didn't make sense until dig some digging and slowly started to understand better.
When you said, "(I only use 10 draws),"I thought you literally meant the previous 10 drawings.
Here is a list (in the pic on the right) of the previous 10 NC day drawings at the time you posted this.
I only see 09x while looking at the previous 10 drawings.
This is where I scratched my head and realized that you were using more than the previous 10 drawings. You were actually saying use the previous 10 exact order pairs that have digit 0 in the 1st position.
To know where you got this list...
09x (last number drawn was 090)
09x
06x
00x
03x
07x
00x
04x
09x
09x
you had to actually use the previous 63 drawings to get the previous 10 exact order combos with digit 0 in the 1st position.
#1 #2 #3 #4
676 796 932 802 215 943 785 563 532 090 109 238 095 497 763 987 457 919 885 524 066 238 955 582 678 696 001 178 955 260
#5 #5 #6 #7
033 774 476 553 489 969 723 518 644 329 078 260 228 628 304 587 163 104 358 108 001 603 521 044 888 808 213 532 746 682
#9 #10
095 518 099
*Do this for all the digits.
This is where I scratch my head again because I'm still kind of unclear about what you mean by, "Do this for all digits."
I assuming you mean the front pairs you mentioned.
0x 1x 2x 3x 4x 5x 6x 7x 8x 9x
Do this (record the previous 10 front exact order pairs) for all digits (1x 2x 3x 4x 5x 6x 7x 8x 9x).
Then I realized when you said, "By doing this you can see what is missing. For digit '0' what is missing are: 01x,02x,05x,08x." that you were talking about something else.
Ok so out of
09x (last number drawn was 090)
09x
06x
00x
03x
07x
00x
04x
09x
09x
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
09x 09x 06x 00x 03x 07x 00x 04x 09x 09x= 00x, 03, 04x, 06x, 07x, 09x
#1 #2 #3 #4
so what's missing out of the most recent 10 front exact order pairs are the front exact order pairs 01x, 02x, 05x, 08x
So now I soak it all in: Do this for all the digits. By doing this you can see what is missing. For digit '0' what is missing are: 01x,02x,05x,08x
I'm not quite clear on what to do next.
The Lowest Statistical Average (LSA = when something is expected to be drawn) for Exact Order pairs is 1x every 100 drawings. In this sequence of combos 09x 09x 06x 00x 03x 07x 00x 04x 09x 09x exact order pair 09x just so happens to be hot. Out of the sequence 01x, 02x, 05x, 08x only 08x is very late (has not be drawn within the previous 300 drawings)
One golden strategy that I always use when possible is always play any classification that has Not Hit when it is expected to hit at least 7 times (NH@7x). Looking at the pic to the left of the pairs analysis, exact order pair 08x has not been drawn within the previous 320 drawings. Again, the LSA for exact order pairs is 1x every 100 drawings. This means EO pair 08x is NH@3x. So regarding my NH@7x strategy When any Exact Order pair has Not Hit within the previous 700 drawings then PLAY IT!
Question: Are you saying that when the most recent 10 exact order pairs with digit 0 in the 1st position are equal to a total of 6 exact order pairs then.....what? Is the total always exactly 6 exact order pairs only?
which pair will it be?
Basically, this is where we're supposed to do our own filtering from here and you suggest...
You can do three charts (workouts) and compare the charts. Have one for the front pair and another for the back pair and yet another for the spilt pair.
Then only thing that I care about when considering a strategy to spend my hard earned coin on is the accuracy rate. I'm sure this is why I don't play anyone else's strategies. Before I spend my time and effort on someone's else strategies I would ate least want to know the accuracy rate is, especially, from the creator of the strategy. You don't have to say how many times you've tested it, I just want to know the exact accuracy rate of the strategy to know if it's even worth the time and effort to begin with. What's the accuracy rate for this particular strategy so far?
No matter what it is, I would still test it at least 100 times to verify how accurate it is for myself and of course, I suggest everyone else do the same thing. This is just how progress is made in strategy development. Go from hypothesis, to theory, to law.
To be clear, I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful. I'm just trying to get better clarification.
I follow positional frequency trends as if they were going to save my life and I use a ridiculous amount of filters which is why I know at the moment, your strategy isn't fully developed because...
- you're not specific on exactly how many Exact Order pairs must be within the previous 10 Exact Order pairs. This needs to be known for sure in order to be consistently precise.
- you didn't provide the accuracy rate. Do at least 100 test just to begin to have idea of how accuracy this strategy is. It would be cool for all of us that are interested to join in to test it with but to do that you need to have a complete strategy. Have you tested what you suggest we do, "You can do three charts (workouts) and compare the charts. Have one for the front pair and another for the back pair and yet another for the spilt pair." If so, what were the results of those test?
- you didn't make a prediction .
One lingering question I have is, what do you feel is the best way to choose what combos to play from this point?
It's your strategy. Go ahead and make a prediction using it. Give a few examples of it working.
Other than that, thanks for sharing and I look forward to seeing how this strategy turns out. Keep at it.
Hi Chinese government invading our privacy without our consent.
Hi U.S. government who also invades our privacy without our consent.
What's up Uncle Chief Bottle Washer. It's your site you can invade all the privacy you want. I'm sure you may move this topic to Lottery Systems or something but we are only talking about the pick 3 here so it may be relevant enough to not move it.
Carry on.