0-1-1-2-3-5-8-13-21-34-55-89-144-233-377-610-987-1597-2584-4181 ...
~
This is softer: 00-01-01-02-03-05-07-10-14-20-28-40-56
SERGE:
At keno it is sufficient to play like 2 bets pick 10 and never raise the bet. This also is true for payouts like Fantasy 5.
Instead of raising the bet, you might play for more but smarter, not simply raising.
I posted Fanta 5 in Systems, the last set has a lot of power. If you could manage to filter out 3/4 of the bad combinations,
you should win on on the long run. The question would be, how do you eliminate what doesn't pay, if you have a fixed set.
Say that at roulette you have 18 numbers that are not a series, a chance simple and that don't fit into anything known.
It is how do you sort in those? Do you even raise the bet? I saw a known player with a strange selection. He didn't raise,
only played a few rounds, didn't win and left. Raising is not always the answer. Raising is like a black widow version that I might call a boa constricta. But as you know, you can cover all pleins but one, and that one gets it. I saw it, I spinned it.
I am not professional at gambling, I also don't play hard anymore, just use a thinned wheel to keep playing while I don't have a nail to play.
Playing one number and looking at progression, my first question is, what does it pay? When is that number supposed to hit? Eventually you need two consecutive hits, and maybe, if you are playing a number that was out for long, while it is normally a good to play number, it may hit twice in a row and more consistently later. This is never a guarantee as the payouts are low, you are at the loosing end.
01-01-02-03-05-07-10-14-20-28-40-56
You can simulated it in a spreadsheet.
COST |
WIN? |
RESULT? |
bet |
sum bet |
1 |
-1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
-2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
-4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
-7 |
9 |
2 |
5 |
-12 |
15 |
3 |
7 |
-19 |
21 |
2 |
10 |
-29 |
30 |
1 |
14 |
-43 |
42 |
-1 |
20 |
-63 |
60 |
-3 |
25 |
-88 |
75 |
-13 |
40 |
-128 |
120 |
-8 |
56 |
-184 |
168 |
-16 |