700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,168 Posts
Offline
For PBsBonusball drawing for 7/17/23..Let's see what Probability Math and my Stat$cope says about itz Stat$... tossin out dem distractin nonviable "junk numberz" wit those "flip flop oddz" intentionally imbedded by LOs..and remember, this iz a template .. az only the important data will change up..
So?, If Ole Stat$ iz soo non-creditable at predictionz, why haven't dem Jawjackin Lose Lipperzdemonstrated any better skillz than mine?..They cain't THAT'Z why..They cain't consistently correctly predict viable Numberz like Ole Stat$..beating my %'s of elimination of junck numberz, cuz they DON'T KNOW "Probability" az some claim...gitin a 3 or 4-win Potluckishly izzn't tha same az reducing a Matrix, yet still having the correct numba eVeRyTiMe..
This PB drawing ,..with just ova 80% of"em or moe being pointed out by Probability Math....Again, Don't blame me..It iz whut it iz..Dat Jackpot duzzn't seem to be creatin dat"Tickitmania Zone" az LOs hope.We're gitin weeary of such bleak payoutz all while payin doulbe whut we used ta pay for betta prize oddz..!!
OleStat$talker'sAgenda & Motto iz, "Play theleastamount of numberz that're "probable",.." just play only theRIGHT ONES", toss da jUnCk.!!.... just trust in the Math BaBy..cauze 2+2 will faevaah =4
Beautifully accurateProbability Math will ALWAYS point out the RIGHT ONES..yepp, even with dem Mainballs too. so you won't have to play all dem junck Mainballz..just pray the rezultz aren't rigged..
MY "5avorite" pickz of BB suspectz this 7/17/23PB drawing would be..*1, *19, 6, *12, *4, *8, 20, 2, 23, 11, 7, 26, 9, 10, *22, 18 ..round 60% of 26 total..
Possible "sneaky" pickz are. ...5, 21
Any others NOT pointed out by the Laws?, will constitute outright blatant rigging..!!
Note LP's timestamp of this Post...
Drawing is held at 11p EST
Predictions via PROBABILITYMATH, iz gonna soon make you a Bonified "$29.95 Believah",.."Lotto Pro" & "Probability Math" will tell ya da Truth..
700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,168 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Jul 17, 2023
2011? Wish I'd have photoed my Texas lottery wins from 1992 for this occasion.
G
"Wish I'd have photoed my Texas lottery wins from 1992 for this occasion. "
Well, I sed "When itz Matrix wuz a 5/39"..Which meanz, I had to go back n git a winning ticket in the Game'z PAST..!! PoPe1354 .. It'z kinda like havin to dig an artifact outta dem Catacombz in the Vatican.. It'z a 5/42 now..which izz a lot harder..then I have to face riggin tooo!
700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,168 Posts
Offline
And AGAIN..!!,
The PB Bonusball's number for 7/17/23 was in fact "21" ,.. faithfully POINTED OUT by Probability Math.,.and just az I figured, sittin az one of thoze. "Sneaky" pickz...
PB5-8-9-17-41 (21)
"21" was CORRECT in itz FRUITION , which obeyed Probability Math'sLawz, appeared RIGHT ON itz Lawful predicted equational measure descriptions, governed by "Probability Rulez"..being a "COLD" number that invoked the Lawzof FruitionTHIZ particular DRAWING..!,
OleStat$talker haz proven "You can really wheel az little az 44% of thecorrectviable numberz in your Game'z Matrix and still have the most probable Oddz of winning"..which iz "puttin theLawzofProbabilityto werk"..cauze az I've proclaimed all along..and consistently proven...
"MATHduzzn't lie,..cauze it cain't.."
Ole Stat$talker standz aLoNe, Trailblazingly provin, that the traditional mythz & pseudo-scientific rhetoric repeatedly expressed by certain utha playa Haterz heaa, clinging to outdated Flat Earth/RRR thinkin... iz.. in "Stat$5habulus" English...
BS
Cauze Ole Stat$ izz the"Galileo of Gamblin" .. and az being prooven?.. I'm comin,.. and yep.."Probability Math" iz comin wit Me!
Ohio United States
Member #179,976
February 15, 2017
1,283 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by AllenB on Jul 17, 2023
BTW..I'd get 4-winz everywheaa if my State's game had only 39 numbaz..!! cauze when they once did?.. I busted their Chopz..
Yet more un$ub$tantiated claims by Our beloved OLE $tat$talker. Spoken like a <snip>y MMA Fighter at a weigh in press conference.
Nice Job MrB. Getting 4 of 5 is hard to do. I noticed that you had the 5th number on another line so your Reduction method had all 5. And you did not compain and accuse the Lottery of cheating you. Well done.
OLE $tat$ is obviously threatened by that success so He resorts to his usual Tripe.
He's stuck at the Bottom of the Payoff Mountain. In his mind he is sitting on Top and has this 50% Reduction of the Bonus Balls to prove it. Well and Good (when he is right), but a long way to Climb the Odds Ladder to get to your success.
So Annoying.
This post has been automatically changed by the Lottery Post computer system to remove inappropriate content and/or spam.
Ohio United States
Member #179,976
February 15, 2017
1,283 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stat$talker on Jul 18, 2023
And AGAIN..!!,
The PB Bonusball's number for 7/17/23 was in fact "21" ,.. faithfully POINTED OUT by Probability Math.,.and just az I figured, sittin az one of thoze. "Sneaky" pickz...
PB5-8-9-17-41 (21)
"21" was CORRECT in itz FRUITION , which obeyed Probability Math'sLawz, appeared RIGHT ON itz Lawful predicted equational measure descriptions, governed by "Probability Rulez"..being a "COLD" number that invoked the Lawzof FruitionTHIZ particular DRAWING..!,
OleStat$talker haz proven "You can really wheel az little az 44% of thecorrectviable numberz in your Game'z Matrix and still have the most probable Oddz of winning"..which iz "puttin theLawzofProbabilityto werk"..cauze az I've proclaimed all along..and consistently proven...
"MATHduzzn't lie,..cauze it cain't.."
Ole Stat$talker standz aLoNe, Trailblazingly provin, that the traditional mythz & pseudo-scientific rhetoric repeatedly expressed by certain utha playa Haterz heaa, clinging to outdated Flat Earth/RRR thinkin... iz.. in "Stat$5habulus" English...
BS
Cauze Ole Stat$ izz the"Galileo of Gamblin" .. and az being prooven?.. I'm comin,.. and yep.."Probability Math" iz comin wit Me!
-Stat$talker
What math shows me with your most recent PB prediction post is this:
Spend 18 x $2 = $36
Win 1 x $4 = $4
Profit/Loss = -$32
Let me remind you that the goal (for most) in playing Powerball is to match 5 + 1. Using your as little as 44% claim, you need at best ~11 of 26 PB numbers, and you'll need at best ~30 of 69 main ball numbers. Now what? You need to full wheel those 30/11 number combos, so you spend 1,567,566 x $2 = $3,135,132.
You're correct, the math don't lie! Only a village idiot with Scrooge McDuck money would/could continue to use this method to conquer any lottery.
Now you can post those numbers all in one line group here for free and call yourself a genius if you get lucky with 5 of those 30, plus 1 of those 11, getting drawn, but you win NOTHING! I play the lottery to win, not puff up my chest and claim that I, along with using Probability Math, am superior over all others.
I get it, you know how to use Probability Math to decrease the playing field. Most of us here already know how to do that, in our own way. Some are even posting there winnings using their methods. You post a nice 4/5 win from 12+ years ago (belated congrats), but what can you do now to produce more wins like that? You talk smack but can't back it up. All talk no results statz. Probability Math deserves better from you!
You claim your GA Fantasy 5 is harder to win now with its 5/42 ball matrix, yet you look to take down Powerball with its 5/69 + 1/26 matrix? Math don't lie statz. Conquering the 5/42 matrix is much easier than the 5/69 + 1/26 matrix. I know, I know, you were comparing your Fantasy 5 to my Rolling Cash 5, but my point is don't use "it's harder to win" excuse. You aren't afraid to play Powerball, but trying to play GA Fantasy 5 vs Rolling Cash 5 scares you? Just another excuse in order to avoid the results.
You might be more enjoyable to follow if you were more about the results and wins as opposed to the smack talk and excuses.
700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,168 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mr-B 216 on Jul 19, 2023
What math shows me with your most recent PB prediction post is this:
Spend 18 x $2 = $36
Win 1 x $4 = $4
Profit/Loss = -$32
Let me remind you that the goal (for most) in playing Powerball is to match 5 + 1. Using your as little as 44% claim, you need at best ~11 of 26 PB numbers, and you'll need at best ~30 of 69 main ball numbers. Now what? You need to full wheel those 30/11 number combos, so you spend 1,567,566 x $2 = $3,135,132.
You're correct, the math don't lie! Only a village idiot with Scrooge McDuck money would/could continue to use this method to conquer any lottery.
Now you can post those numbers all in one line group here for free and call yourself a genius if you get lucky with 5 of those 30, plus 1 of those 11, getting drawn, but you win NOTHING! I play the lottery to win, not puff up my chest and claim that I, along with using Probability Math, am superior over all others.
I get it, you know how to use Probability Math to decrease the playing field. Most of us here already know how to do that, in our own way. Some are even posting there winnings using their methods. You post a nice 4/5 win from 12+ years ago (belated congrats), but what can you do now to produce more wins like that? You talk smack but can't back it up. All talk no results statz. Probability Math deserves better from you!
You claim your GA Fantasy 5 is harder to win now with its 5/42 ball matrix, yet you look to take down Powerball with its 5/69 + 1/26 matrix? Math don't lie statz. Conquering the 5/42 matrix is much easier than the 5/69 + 1/26 matrix. I know, I know, you were comparing your Fantasy 5 to my Rolling Cash 5, but my point is don't use "it's harder to win" excuse. You aren't afraid to play Powerball, but trying to play GA Fantasy 5 vs Rolling Cash 5 scares you? Just another excuse in order to avoid the results.
You might be more enjoyable to follow if you were more about the results and wins as opposed to the smack talk and excuses.
Good Luck!
"Just another excuse in order to avoid the results."
I don't make xcuzez B216 ..I make LOs NeRvOuS...& THEY avoid my rezultz..
"You need to full wheel those 30/11 number combos, so you spend 1,567,566 x $2 =$3,135,132."
Noo ya don't either..
Thankz,.. but I don't need "Luck".. cauze I got Probability Math..
It tellz ya xactly wHeN, "whut goez around?.. comez around"..
California United States
Member #167,122
June 27, 2015
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mr-B 216 on Jul 19, 2023
What math shows me with your most recent PB prediction post is this:
Spend 18 x $2 = $36
Win 1 x $4 = $4
Profit/Loss = -$32
Let me remind you that the goal (for most) in playing Powerball is to match 5 + 1. Using your as little as 44% claim, you need at best ~11 of 26 PB numbers, and you'll need at best ~30 of 69 main ball numbers. Now what? You need to full wheel those 30/11 number combos, so you spend 1,567,566 x $2 = $3,135,132.
You're correct, the math don't lie! Only a village idiot with Scrooge McDuck money would/could continue to use this method to conquer any lottery.
Now you can post those numbers all in one line group here for free and call yourself a genius if you get lucky with 5 of those 30, plus 1 of those 11, getting drawn, but you win NOTHING! I play the lottery to win, not puff up my chest and claim that I, along with using Probability Math, am superior over all others.
I get it, you know how to use Probability Math to decrease the playing field. Most of us here already know how to do that, in our own way. Some are even posting there winnings using their methods. You post a nice 4/5 win from 12+ years ago (belated congrats), but what can you do now to produce more wins like that? You talk smack but can't back it up. All talk no results statz. Probability Math deserves better from you!
You claim your GA Fantasy 5 is harder to win now with its 5/42 ball matrix, yet you look to take down Powerball with its 5/69 + 1/26 matrix? Math don't lie statz. Conquering the 5/42 matrix is much easier than the 5/69 + 1/26 matrix. I know, I know, you were comparing your Fantasy 5 to my Rolling Cash 5, but my point is don't use "it's harder to win" excuse. You aren't afraid to play Powerball, but trying to play GA Fantasy 5 vs Rolling Cash 5 scares you? Just another excuse in order to avoid the results.
You might be more enjoyable to follow if you were more about the results and wins as opposed to the smack talk and excuses.
Good Luck!
Polite and Well Said MRb.
Stat$ always picks a line of text from a Critical Reply and goes on the attack with it. That way he thinks he successfully avoids responding to the real questions. A lot like Politics, News coverage and Congressional hearings.
Oblivious to the Fact that he just lost a debate by the score of 3 to nothing. Mrb Score was 2 points for Math and 1 Point for behavioral analysis. Stats got half a point for Math because you can't make someone play all of the combinations, you let them Math out a few more numbers or use a Wheel. Deducting a half a point for behavioral analysis.
And Stats,
Don't send any more PM's about the Score. One Was enough.
Germany
Member #174,817
May 14, 2016
654 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stat$talker on Jul 18, 2023
And AGAIN..!!,
The PB Bonusball's number for 7/17/23 was in fact "21" ,.. faithfully POINTED OUT by Probability Math.,.and just az I figured, sittin az one of thoze. "Sneaky" pickz...
PB5-8-9-17-41 (21)
"21" was CORRECT in itz FRUITION , which obeyed Probability Math'sLawz, appeared RIGHT ON itz Lawful predicted equational measure descriptions, governed by "Probability Rulez"..being a "COLD" number that invoked the Lawzof FruitionTHIZ particular DRAWING..!,
OleStat$talker haz proven "You can really wheel az little az 44% of thecorrectviable numberz in your Game'z Matrix and still have the most probable Oddz of winning"..which iz "puttin theLawzofProbabilityto werk"..cauze az I've proclaimed all along..and consistently proven...
"MATHduzzn't lie,..cauze it cain't.."
Ole Stat$talker standz aLoNe, Trailblazingly provin, that the traditional mythz & pseudo-scientific rhetoric repeatedly expressed by certain utha playa Haterz heaa, clinging to outdated Flat Earth/RRR thinkin... iz.. in "Stat$5habulus" English...
BS
Cauze Ole Stat$ izz the"Galileo of Gamblin" .. and az being prooven?.. I'm comin,.. and yep.."Probability Math" iz comin wit Me!
-Stat$talker
STatLoser....Are you kidding me? You predicted 18 out of 26 numbers. That's almost 70% of the numbers. 69.23% to be exact. That's a joke. In fact it was a side number along with 5. Any math moron can select 70% Yes Probabilty Math says: "You will probably hit and odds are in your favor when you select 70% of the numbers.
Give me a break.
It's always possible that I'm wrong~
But that's never at the top of my list of possibilities.
Ohio United States
Member #194,179
December 3, 2018
492 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mr-B 216 on Jul 16, 2023
"So bring oon da B216 Bombmerz.. "
Winning numbers Rolling Cash 5 were 01152230 37
Check out this blunder. I started filling out my cards using 15 and 22. Threw in 37. Then changed over to 30 and 37 but didn't include 15 and 22 with those two.
We were both close. You got 4/5 and I had all numbers covered but the spread was wrong.
700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,168 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Lottomeister on Jul 19, 2023
STatLoser....Are you kidding me? You predicted 18 out of 26 numbers. That's almost 70% of the numbers. 69.23% to be exact. That's a joke. In fact it was a side number along with 5. Any math moron can select 70% Yes Probabilty Math says: "You will probably hit and odds are in your favor when you select 70% of the numbers.
Give me a break.
If YOU gotta problem wit how the Math seez eVeRyThAnG... See GOD..It'z hiz Truth , not mine.. Lilmeister..
I'm just the Messenger... and you're Welcome to do betta.. While being az accurate..!!