Poll: Classic Mega MillionsPrev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

If the old $1 56/46 Mega Millions held one drawing a week on Monday would you play?

Always

[ 12 ]

[ 46.2% ]

Sometimes

[ 12 ]

[ 46.2% ]

Never

[ 2 ]

[ 7.7% ]

Total valid votes

[ 26 ]

Discarded votes

[ 2 ]

Think

Marquette, MI
United States
Member #20,540
August 20, 2005
1,231 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2023, 3:32 pm

Coke brought back Classic Coke so why not have Mega Millions bring back the old $1 game once per week.

Would you play?

Would you add the classic Megaplier too?
Think

Marquette, MI
United States
Member #20,540
August 20, 2005
1,231 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2023, 3:58 pm

Forgot to mention this would be in addition to the current version.
Stack47

Kentucky
United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,377 Posts
Offline

Nov 19, 2023, 11:21 pm

Though it was $1 a ticket, the 5/56 + 1/46 version of MM paid only $250,000 for matching five numbers. Are you experiencing a shortage of large money jackpot building games in Michigan and need another?

FYI, PB has a Monday drawing and would create a "which game should I play" dilemma but Thursday is open.

"Some people have something to say while other people feel the need to say something"
Think

Marquette, MI
United States
Member #20,540
August 20, 2005
1,231 Posts
Offline

Nov 22, 2023, 3:13 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on Nov 19, 2023
Though it was $1 a ticket, the 5/56 + 1/46 version of MM paid only $250,000 for matching five numbers. Are you experiencing a shortage of large money jackpot building games in Michigan and need another?

FYI, PB has a Monday drawing and would create a "which game should I play" dilemma but Thursday is open.

"paid only $250,000"

That is correct it PAID!

"Are you experiencing a shortage of large money jackpot building games in Michigan and need another?"

We are experiencing a shortage of large winners like we had with the old game.

Many people on here complain about $2 tickets and complain about nobody winning anything and they also complain that they want smaller jackpots and more winners. We had that with the old Mega Millions.

From 2009 until the old version ended on 10/18/2013 there were 172 winners in Michigan including 5 Jackpots

https://www.michiganlottery.com/resources/big-winners?GAMES=Mega+Millions&MINPRIZE=10000000&START_DATE=2009-01-02T05%3A00%3A00.000Z&END_DATE=2013-10-18T04%3A00%3A00.000Z

From October 28 2017, when this version started, there have been 35 winners in Michigan with One (1) Jackpot. That is 6 years of data for this version versus 4 years for the old version (Michigan used to have all the data but decided to ruin its website sometime in 2013)

https://www.michiganlottery.com/resources/big-winners?GAMES=Mega+Millions&MINPRIZE=10000000&START_DATE=2017-10-28T04%3A00%3A00.000Z&END_DATE=2023-11-22T05%3A00%3A00.000Z

Also the old Megaplier paid a Million for second prize.

With so many people on here saying they want cheaper tickets with better odds and more winners I am surprised more people have not voted in this poll yet.
rcbbuckeye

100

Texas
United States
Member #55,887
October 23, 2007
18,610 Posts
Offline

Nov 22, 2023, 3:26 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Think on Nov 22, 2023
"paid only $250,000"

That is correct it PAID!

"Are you experiencing a shortage of large money jackpot building games in Michigan and need another?"

We are experiencing a shortage of large winners like we had with the old game.

Many people on here complain about $2 tickets and complain about nobody winning anything and they also complain that they want smaller jackpots and more winners. We had that with the old Mega Millions.

From 2009 until the old version ended on 10/18/2013 there were 172 winners in Michigan including 5 Jackpots

https://www.michiganlottery.com/resources/big-winners?GAMES=Mega+Millions&MINPRIZE=10000000&START_DATE=2009-01-02T05%3A00%3A00.000Z&END_DATE=2013-10-18T04%3A00%3A00.000Z

From October 28 2017, when this version started, there have been 35 winners in Michigan with One (1) Jackpot. That is 6 years of data for this version versus 4 years for the old version (Michigan used to have all the data but decided to ruin its website sometime in 2013)

https://www.michiganlottery.com/resources/big-winners?GAMES=Mega+Millions&MINPRIZE=10000000&START_DATE=2017-10-28T04%3A00%3A00.000Z&END_DATE=2023-11-22T05%3A00%3A00.000Z

Also the old Megaplier paid a Million for second prize.

With so many people on here saying they want cheaper tickets with better odds and more winners I am surprised more people have not voted in this poll yet.

Understand your point. I voted "sometimes" because here in Texas we have the "2-Step" game which starts at $200,000 at waaay better odds, and grows until there's a winner. The one downside to the game is it's pari-mutuel, so there can and often is more than one jackpot winner.

So for me, the old MM game would ok with the megaplier until 2-Step grew above $250K.

CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)

JUST LOOK AT THE ODDS OF ANY JACKPOT GAME, THAT WILL TELL YOU EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
Stack47

Kentucky
United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,377 Posts
Offline

Nov 23, 2023, 2:25 am

"We are experiencing a shortage of large winners like we had with the old game."

The purpose of a large money jackpot building game is to get more people to play and by default will not produce more winners.

"Many people on here complain about $2 tickets and complain about nobody winning anything and they also complain that they want smaller jackpots and more winners."

Won't comment on what people complain about when it's simple enough to find the odds against winning anything. It's should be obvious when 65% of all MM combinations won't match any of the five numbers or the mega ball. And with a matrix over 300 million and $2 tickets, we shouldn't expect to see jackpots won very often and should expect only one winning ticket.

The MM website says,

"accommodate public demand for more frequent large jackpots and bigger lower-tier prizes, Mega Millions introduced a new matrix on October 28, 2017, with a $2 ticket price and a $40 million starting jackpot. Not only will jackpots roll faster and higher, but the change in the prize structure means that players now have a much better chance than ever before of winning the second-tier prize of $1 million (or up to $5 million with the optional Megaplier)."

It looks like the players got what they asked for.

"Some people have something to say while other people feel the need to say something"
Stack47

Kentucky
United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,377 Posts
Offline

Nov 23, 2023, 2:38 am

Quote: Originally posted by rcbbuckeye on Nov 22, 2023
Understand your point. I voted "sometimes" because here in Texas we have the "2-Step" game which starts at $200,000 at waaay better odds, and grows until there's a winner. The one downside to the game is it's pari-mutuel, so there can and often is more than one jackpot winner.

So for me, the old MM game would ok with the megaplier until 2-Step grew above $250K.

I understand their point too, but don't see how that could happen on a multi state level because it would compete with other MUSL and state games. There were over 175 million combinations in the old MM game and players asked for larger jackpots.

Our 4/35 + 1/25 has $225,000 jackpot with a decent secondary prize payouts. And we have Lucky for Life that has a nice intermediate jackpot. Ohio has a nice mix of games with something for about everybody.

"Some people have something to say while other people feel the need to say something"
rcbbuckeye

100

Texas
United States
Member #55,887
October 23, 2007
18,610 Posts
Offline

Nov 23, 2023, 8:09 am

Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on Nov 23, 2023
I understand their point too, but don't see how that could happen on a multi state level because it would compete with other MUSL and state games. There were over 175 million combinations in the old MM game and players asked for larger jackpots.

Our 4/35 + 1/25 has $225,000 jackpot with a decent secondary prize payouts. And we have Lucky for Life that has a nice intermediate jackpot. Ohio has a nice mix of games with something for about everybody.

Agree, there are plenty of games for most players, but some just can't be satisfied.

CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)

JUST LOOK AT THE ODDS OF ANY JACKPOT GAME, THAT WILL TELL YOU EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
Droptop209

Newman, California
United States
Member #193,980
November 24, 2018
142 Posts
Offline

Nov 25, 2023, 2:25 pm

Classic MM is where I started playing lotto in 2014.
Jackpot-Hunter

us
Member #237,473
November 25, 2023
3 Posts
Offline

Nov 25, 2023, 9:01 pm

Good poll question.

I like the idea of more winners with smaller prizes.
Rexer90

LA Ca.
United States
Member #172,743
February 3, 2016
190 Posts
Offline

Nov 26, 2023, 12:13 am

Quote: Originally posted by Jackpot-Hunter on Nov 25, 2023
Good poll question.

I like the idea of more winners with smaller prizes.

We're getting fewer winners with smaller prizes...

In August of 2017 a $350M jackpot would have have given the winner $216M before taxes & $162M after taxes in California.

That's $0.46 on the dollar take-home.

On 11/27/2023 the PB jackpot is $352M.... with a cash option of $163M before taxes & about $103M after taxes in California..

That's $0.29 on the dollar take-home.

That's a difference of $53M on the pre-tax & $59M on the post-tax payout... So where the hell is that extra $50M+ going??
wander73

Search conductor everymailbox

Philadelphia, PA
United States
Member #153,767
March 24, 2014
9,164 Posts
Offline

Dec 3, 2023, 1:33 am

Now that I know the pattern system you betcha.

Seeking content generation for various needs including blogs, reselling, and beyond.

Search
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,355 Posts
Offline

Dec 3, 2023, 11:52 am

Quote: Originally posted by Rexer90 on Nov 26, 2023
We're getting fewer winners with smaller prizes...

In August of 2017 a $350M jackpot would have have given the winner $216M before taxes & $162M after taxes in California.

That's $0.46 on the dollar take-home.

On 11/27/2023 the PB jackpot is $352M.... with a cash option of $163M before taxes & about $103M after taxes in California..

That's $0.29 on the dollar take-home.

That's a difference of $53M on the pre-tax & $59M on the post-tax payout... So where the hell is that extra $50M+ going??

"That's a difference of $53M on the pre-tax & $59M on the post-tax payout... So where the hell is that extra $50M+ going??"

It'z goin into the pocketz of the Weaselz who'z responsible for reneging the "40 Million" reset starting Jackpotz... Yet stickin wit their ticket price increase...But again, they're hoping We playerz won't notice and hold'em accountable...

Write to your State Senator..notify your local News Reporterz....or CNN....Git THEM to ask tthe questionz ....Turn on the Lightz..!!!

I suspect it'll show the same people responsible for turning on my Location button , just before I post..after everytime going into "Airplane Mode"

-Stat$talker
rcbbuckeye

100

Texas
United States
Member #55,887
October 23, 2007
18,610 Posts
Offline

Dec 3, 2023, 12:00 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Rexer90 on Nov 26, 2023
We're getting fewer winners with smaller prizes...

In August of 2017 a $350M jackpot would have have given the winner $216M before taxes & $162M after taxes in California.

That's $0.46 on the dollar take-home.

On 11/27/2023 the PB jackpot is $352M.... with a cash option of $163M before taxes & about $103M after taxes in California..

That's $0.29 on the dollar take-home.

That's a difference of $53M on the pre-tax & $59M on the post-tax payout... So where the hell is that extra $50M+ going??

Get your point. But...interest rates control the difference between annuity prize and cash value prize.

MM cash value for Tuesday draw is $175.4 million. That's enough for me. In fact, at my age, $1 million ($630,000 after fed taxes) is enough for me.

CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)

JUST LOOK AT THE ODDS OF ANY JACKPOT GAME, THAT WILL TELL YOU EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,642
September 1, 2019
4,355 Posts
Offline

Dec 4, 2023, 1:17 pm

Quote: Originally posted by rcbbuckeye on Dec 3, 2023
Get your point. But...interest rates control the difference between annuity prize and cash value prize.

MM cash value for Tuesday draw is $175.4 million. That's enough for me. In fact, at my age, $1 million ($630,000 after fed taxes) is enough for me.

"MM cash value for Tuesday draw is $175.4 million. That's enough for me. In fact, at my age, $1 million ($630,000 after fed taxes) is enough for me."

Yeaa, but will it be enuf AFTA You factor in MY Muhammad Ali cut...Howard Cosell?

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Poll: Classic Mega MillionsPrev TopicNext Topic

Poll: Classic Mega MillionsPrev Topic Next Topic