Further Exploring the Relationship Between Quantum Mechanics and Luck Great choice!Prev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

Pick3geniu$

New York
United States
Member #203,701
January 14, 2020
380 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2024, 5:11 pm

Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Nov 16, 2024
heloo pick3genius=

Modern physics, represented by relativity and quantum mechanics, has expanded our understanding of the universe. It has shown us that Newton's laws have limitations in certain regimes, such as at high speeds or on very small scales. However, this does not invalidate Newton's laws, but rather limits their domain of application.
Randomness and Determinism in the Lottery
Randomness in the lottery is a fundamental concept. Draws are designed to be unpredictable and uninfluenced by any external factors. The idea that the lottery is deterministic contradicts this basic premise.
The complexity of the systems involved in a draw, such as random number generators and physical mechanisms, makes it virtually impossible to predict the outcome with accuracy. Even if there were some intrinsic bias in the system, the inherent randomness of the drawing process would make it predominant.
Bias in the Pick 3 Game
The claim that the pick 3 game is biased towards "singles" is a popular belief, but there is no scientific evidence to support it.
The randomness of lottery draws is guaranteed by security mechanisms and regulations. If there were a systematic bias in favor of certain numbers or patterns, this would be considered fraud and lotteries would be investigated and punished.
The perception of patterns in random sequences is a psychological phenomenon known as apophenia. We often see patterns where there are none, which can lead to belief in systems to "win" the lottery.
To demonstrate the randomness of pick 3, it would be necessary to analyze a massive amount of lottery data and apply rigorous statistical tests. However, it is important to emphasize that randomness does not mean that all numbers have the same probability of being drawn in each round. The probability of a specific number being drawn is always the same, but the combination of numbers can vary from draw to draw.

In short, the claim that the lottery is deterministic and that pick 3 is biased towards "singles" is not supported by scientific evidence. Randomness is a fundamental principle of gambling, and the search for patterns or systems to "win" the lottery is, more often than not, fruitless.

Hello. dr san. The lottery would be considered deterministic according to Physics is what I meant. However, it's just too involved to determine the outcomes of draws and the lottery is effectively random. The pick 3 game is not biased toward any one of the 1000 individual permutations or numbers, but it can be biased when it comes to groups of numbers. The game is inherently biased toward singles since singles have a much greater probability of coming out than repeating numbers. You don't need scientific evidence to support this and this can be considered an axiom. I've emphasized the need to approach the game using simplicity and logic and this is just logical.

The question of patterns and whether or not they matter or make a difference has been a long-standing open question for myself over the last 25 years. Theoretically, patterns offer protection against consecutive losses that are lengthy, but this does not necessarily mean that this is the case in the real world. Fortunately, I'm in the best position now than I've ever been to finally answer this question and maybe even definitively using the app which allows for changes on the fly enabling me to see the results right away. I've explored this very question this past week more in depth. At this point, the answer to this question is yes that patterns do indeed matter, at least insofar as protection against lengthy consecutive losses goes. I can show you evidence of this too if you'd like. But, sequence restrictions also matter just as much. That's because all patterns are sequences and not all sequences are patterns. You can have pattern security without sequence security and it wouldn't be enough.

You're apparently under the erroneous belief that randomness means lack of patterns. This kind of thinking will only prevent you from getting anywhere with the Pick 3 game because you don't believe in patterns. The fact is that randomness gives rise to patterns. This is order from chaos which happens naturally. You have true randomness on the quantum level which ends up to give rise to the order we see in the world. Randomness means happening by chance and it is a misconception that it is a lack of patterns. Regardless, whether there are patterns or apparent patterns, what matters is having a basis for when to play what. Patterns or what appear to be patterns provide this basis.

I've stated that Newtonian laws as interpreted in modern Physics are incorrect. I was not referring to limitations in their applications such as with high speeds, on small scales, or the orbit of Mercury. Newton pretty much had it correct when he originally derived his laws, although not completely. But, physicists have incorrectly manipulated his laws into what you know them to be today. I've already worked on these laws and I have corrected them. On top of that, I've also derived three laws of inertia that are missing from Physics. So, this means we only have half the story and the other half is missing. Surprise surprise!! Who would have guessed that your Pick 3 genius also doubles as a once in a lifetime scientific genius? You get two for the price of one
Mr-B 216

Ohio
United States
Member #179,973
February 15, 2017
1,333 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2024, 7:33 pm

Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Nov 16, 2024
heloo pick3genius=

Modern physics, represented by relativity and quantum mechanics, has expanded our understanding of the universe. It has shown us that Newton's laws have limitations in certain regimes, such as at high speeds or on very small scales. However, this does not invalidate Newton's laws, but rather limits their domain of application.
Randomness and Determinism in the Lottery
Randomness in the lottery is a fundamental concept. Draws are designed to be unpredictable and uninfluenced by any external factors. The idea that the lottery is deterministic contradicts this basic premise.
The complexity of the systems involved in a draw, such as random number generators and physical mechanisms, makes it virtually impossible to predict the outcome with accuracy. Even if there were some intrinsic bias in the system, the inherent randomness of the drawing process would make it predominant.
Bias in the Pick 3 Game
The claim that the pick 3 game is biased towards "singles" is a popular belief, but there is no scientific evidence to support it.
The randomness of lottery draws is guaranteed by security mechanisms and regulations. If there were a systematic bias in favor of certain numbers or patterns, this would be considered fraud and lotteries would be investigated and punished.
The perception of patterns in random sequences is a psychological phenomenon known as apophenia. We often see patterns where there are none, which can lead to belief in systems to "win" the lottery.
To demonstrate the randomness of pick 3, it would be necessary to analyze a massive amount of lottery data and apply rigorous statistical tests. However, it is important to emphasize that randomness does not mean that all numbers have the same probability of being drawn in each round. The probability of a specific number being drawn is always the same, but the combination of numbers can vary from draw to draw.

In short, the claim that the lottery is deterministic and that pick 3 is biased towards "singles" is not supported by scientific evidence. Randomness is a fundamental principle of gambling, and the search for patterns or systems to "win" the lottery is, more often than not, fruitless.

"The claim that the pick 3 game is biased towards "singles" is a popular belief, "

Due to the fact that there are 720 singles, 270 doubles, and 10 triples, it only makes sense that there would be more singles drawn.

Here is a small random sample from 6 states. One set of data covers All drawings I have in my database, and the other set is for the Last 1000 drawings in each of those states. You'll see that they all pretty much hit dead on their expected counts.

Triples 10 1.00%
Doubles 270 27.00%
Singles 720 72.00%
Total 1000 100.00%

CA All CA Last 1000
Triples 233 1.17% Triples 15 1.50%
Doubles 5282 26.47% Doubles 269 26.90%
Singles 14438 72.36% Singles 716 71.60%
Total 19953 100.00% Total 1000 100.00%

GA All GA Last 1000
Triples 222 0.95% Triples 7 0.70%
Doubles 6327 26.95% Doubles 270 27.00%
Singles 16929 72.11% Singles 723 72.30%
Total 23478 100.00% Total 1000 100.00%

KY All KY Last 1000
Triples 196 0.97% Triples 5 0.50%
Doubles 5377 26.69% Doubles 270 27.00%
Singles 14571 72.33% Singles 725 72.50%
Total 20144 100.00% Total 1000 100.00%

OH All OH Last 1000
Triples 223 0.94% Triples 7 0.70%
Doubles 6424 27.02% Doubles 241 24.10%
Singles 17131 72.05% Singles 752 75.20%
Total 23778 100.00% Total 1000 100.00%

PA All PA Last 1000
Triples 257 1.04% Triples 7 0.70%
Doubles 6678 27.00% Doubles 267 26.70%
Singles 17798 71.96% Singles 726 72.60%
Total 24733 100.00% Total 1000 100.00%

SC All SC Last 1000
Triples 152 1.02% Triples 5 0.50%
Doubles 4061 27.13% Doubles 274 27.40%
Singles 10753 71.85% Singles 721 72.10%
Total 14966 100.00% Total 1000 100.00%

What goes around comes around.
Player649

Canada
Member #218,115
October 17, 2021
171 Posts
Offline

Nov 17, 2024, 12:32 am

Quote: Originally posted by Player649 on Nov 16, 2024
Dr san is practicing science for the sake of science, not much practical application there. He can turn these scientific formulas into working prediction systems and demonstrate what results they bring. Results are all that matters.

As to digits in Pick 3 there is actually easier way to use them. Select 8 digits for each play. Use whatever method you prefer for selection. Wheel for box. This gives you 56 combos, either singles or doubles. You hit 3 in 8 you are a winner.

These results are based on California Pick 3 draws from 2020:
- 30 draws
- 23 singles had 7 winners (30%)
- 7 doubles had 5 winners (71%)
- on top of this, box doubles pay much more than box singles
Small sample but already quite revealing.

Don't fool yourself - if you want to make money in Pick 3 the only way is through doubles.
Which means you have to target doubles.
Which means you have to have statistics on when doubles are more likely to come out.
Because doubles quite often tend to cluster. And this can easily make money.

I don't play Pick 3 because I don't have it in my area. Otherwise I'd give it a good shot. Based on statistics, not fantasies you can see in Pick 3 forum.

Additional information regarding these statistics.

The same lottery, the same time frame but different method of selecting digits. The previous one selected from latest 15 draws, this one from only 6 - 7, or even shorter (variable):
- 30 draws
- 23 singles had 11 winners (48%)
- 7 doubles had 6 winners (86%)

Not the first time demonstration that, generally, in Pick 3 short term data produces better results than the long term. Trends in Pick 3 fluctuate very quickly.
Pick3geniu$

New York
United States
Member #203,701
January 14, 2020
380 Posts
Offline

Nov 19, 2024, 9:15 am

Quote: Originally posted by Player649 on Nov 17, 2024
Additional information regarding these statistics.

The same lottery, the same time frame but different method of selecting digits. The previous one selected from latest 15 draws, this one from only 6 - 7, or even shorter (variable):
- 30 draws
- 23 singles had 11 winners (48%)
- 7 doubles had 6 winners (86%)

Not the first time demonstration that, generally, in Pick 3 short term data produces better results than the long term. Trends in Pick 3 fluctuate very quickly.

There are times when doubles bunch up together coming out a lot in the short term like what you're showing, but most often there are more singles in the short term. The key here is with choosing how many draws and to be consistent. For example, choosing the latest 6 or 7 draws and keeping with the same number of draws every time. Can you predict with any reliability when to expect more doubles in the short term? What you're showing doesn't help or is useless without knowing when to expect this to occur.
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,558
June 9, 2010
4,155 Posts
Offline

Nov 19, 2024, 3:07 pm

Hello,Mr-b-216 can you do the following tracking of pick3 in several states? Where one of the digits repeats from the last draw but not in the same position e.g. 138, next 489 repeated the digit 8 but not in the 3rd position, it appeared in the 2nd position. What is the percentage of this pattern? The objective is to create a filter for the repetition of the digit from the last draw without being in the same position.
Mr-B 216

Ohio
United States
Member #179,973
February 15, 2017
1,333 Posts
Offline

Nov 19, 2024, 8:55 pm

Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Nov 19, 2024
Hello,Mr-b-216 can you do the following tracking of pick3 in several states? Where one of the digits repeats from the last draw but not in the same position e.g. 138, next 489 repeated the digit 8 but not in the 3rd position, it appeared in the 2nd position. What is the percentage of this pattern? The objective is to create a filter for the repetition of the digit from the last draw without being in the same position.

Here is a small sampling from 50 OH Pick3 drawings.

Drawings are in ascending date order, with oldest drawing listed first on top.

672 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
647 Repeat
317 Pos 2 went to Pos 1, Pos 1 went to Pos 2
134 Pos 3 went to Pos 2, Pos 1 went to Pos 3
741 Repeat
849 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
783 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
727 N?A
509 Pos 3 went to Pos 2, Pos 2 went to Pos 3
190 Repeat
158 N/A
034 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
547 Repeat
317 N/A
205 Pos 3 went to Pos 2, Pos 2 went to Pos 3
650 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
462 Pos 1 went to Pos 2, Pos 1 went to Pos 3
844 Repeat
944 N/A
062 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
446 Repeat
826 Pos 3 went to Pos 1
617 Pos 3 went to Pos 1, Pos 2 went to Pos 3
741 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
275 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
850 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
887 N/A
405 Pos 3 went to Pos 1
583 N/A
124 Pos 2 went to Pos 1, Pos 1 went to Pos 3
221 N/A
349 N/A
722 N/A
489 Repeat
119 N/A
825 N/A
040 N/A
182 Pos 2 went to Pos 1
884 N/A
631 Pos 2 went to Pos 1
347 Repeat
387 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
213 N/A
607 Repeat
504 Pos 3 went to Pos 1, Pos 3 went to Pos 2
443 Repeat
446 Repeat
036 N/A
251 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
219

672 -> 647 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
317 -> 134 Pos 2 went to Pos 1
317 -> 134 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
134 -> 741 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
134 -> 741 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
849 -> 783 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
783 -> 727 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
509 -> 190 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
509 -> 190 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
034 -> 547 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
205 -> 650 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
205 -> 650 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
650 -> 462 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
462 -> 844 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
462 -> 844 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
062 -> 446 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
826 -> 617 Pos 3 went to Pos 1
617 -> 741 Pos 3 went to Pos 1
617 -> 741 Pos 2 went to Pos 3
741 -> 275 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
275 -> 850 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
850 -> 887 Pos 1 went to Pos 2
405 -> 583 Pos 3 went to Pos 1
124 -> 221 Pos 2 went to Pos 1
124 -> 221 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
182 -> 884 Pos 2 went to Pos 1
631 -> 347 Pos 2 went to Pos 1
387 -> 213 Pos 1 went to Pos 3
504 -> 443 Pos 3 went to Pos 1
504 -> 443 Pos 3 went to Pos 2
251 -> 219 Pos 3 went to Pos 2

Pos 1 went to Pos 2, 6 times in 50 drawings. (12.00%)
Pos 1 went to Pos 3, 5 times in 50 drawings. (10.00%}
Pos 2 went to Pos 1, 4 times in 50 drawings. (8.00%)
Pos 2 went to Pos 3, 5 times in 50 drawings. (10.00%}
Pos 3 went to Pos 1, 4 times in 50 drawings. (8.00%)
Pos 3 went to Pos 2, 7 times in 50 drawings. (14.00%)

What goes around comes around.
Player649

Canada
Member #218,115
October 17, 2021
171 Posts
Offline

Nov 19, 2024, 8:55 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Pick3geniu$ on Nov 19, 2024
There are times when doubles bunch up together coming out a lot in the short term like what you're showing, but most often there are more singles in the short term. The key here is with choosing how many draws and to be consistent. For example, choosing the latest 6 or 7 draws and keeping with the same number of draws every time. Can you predict with any reliability when to expect more doubles in the short term? What you're showing doesn't help or is useless without knowing when to expect this to occur.

You are correct, the trick is to predict when doubles may start showing up.

There might be a way.

Data compiled by Mr-B-216 indicates that in the long run doubles frequency oscillates around 27%, as supposed to be. But in the short term this % may oscillate from as low as 10% to as high as 50% in 20 draws (these are my observations from the past, not statistics which need to be computed). Pick 3 is a dynamic lottery where significant deviations from average tend to revert to average quite quickly. Therefore observing what's THE CURRENT percentage of doubles in short term is crucial. There is no guarantee but as the percentage drops the probability for a double greatly increases.

One of the issues to resolve here is the determination of what constitutes short term: 20 latest draws, 30, in between, more than 30, less than 20, variable? Which one is the most accurate as a predictor, perhaps any at a given time? I only ran some very basic singles/doubles ratio statistics and this would have to be refined and backtrack tested for efficiency. But I believe the general idea is sound.

At this moment I don't have time to look into this issue in depth as I'm upgrading my 649 methodology (new wheels + backtracks) but perhaps early next year. Programming would be necessary, this is not stuff for a spreadsheet. Python is easy, I just tried it 2 months ago for a wheel evaluator and I like it.
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,507 Posts
Offline

Nov 19, 2024, 10:05 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Player649 on Nov 14, 2024
The question about the influence of the configuration of basic filters on the randomness of lotteries is quite pertinent and raises an important point for those who use number analysis and selection tools.

No filters, no matter how basic or complex, have any influence on the process of random selection. There is no question here.

Randomness: This is the characteristic of an event occurring unpredictably, without any pattern or external influence.

There are 2 properties of randomness: process and output. The process states that in a given pool of items each item has EXACTLY THE SAME chance of being selected. End of definition. The EQUALITY of chance does not extend to randomness output, however, far from it. Look at any frequency statistics for any period of time: are the frequencies equal? That's the basis for analysis.

Can the configuration of basic filters introduce a bias in randomness?

Theoretically, yes. By using filters, you are, in a way, trying to "guide" the selection of numbers, moving away from the idea of a completely random choice.

Weird idea at best. To "guide" (i.e. change) the random selection process you need to change the internal random formula. External factors do not have any effect.

It is important to note:

Lotteries are games of chance: Randomness is the basis of any lottery. There is no strategy or system that can guarantee a win.

Wrong, dr San, there is such a strategy. Play all numbers and all possible combination. You are guaranteed a jackpot.

Filters as analysis tools: Filters can be useful for analyzing the results of previous draws and identifying patterns. However, it is essential to remember that these patterns do not guarantee that they will be repeated in the future.

Another misconception. Lotteries are about predictability not guarantees. Your job as a player is to look for improving your predictability all the time.

Predictability depend on 2 factors:

1) The number of items in the pool from which you selects. The smaller the pool the better the predictability. Compare coin toss, die roll, deck of cards. In my lottery there are 3 pools to select numbers from: 15 digits (5 front & 10 back), 49 numbers & 13.9M combos. People always select from the 2nd and some heroes even try from the 3rd. My IQ is too low to fathom this logic.

2) How many items you select at a time. With a die, if you bet only 1, your chances are 1/6. Bet 2 and it goes up to 1/3. Therefore, the more items you try to predict the better you predictability rate. Ever observed roulette? Some players bet on more than a dozen different choices. Now you know why.

Jackpot lotteries are not won by single numbers, you need a group with the minimum size of 1 ticket. You don't have to stop there. And the larger the group the better the hit rate (i.e. predictability) you will have. That's simple statistics and it does not matter how you predict you numbers. And if you want to win, dr San, you better have big hits because you can't win more than you hit.

Cognitive bias: The human tendency to look for patterns and connections where there are none can lead to the creation of complex and ineffective filtering systems.

Weird idea again. Perhaps it's true if you measure only input group statistics (statistics used to select numbers). Measure output statistics (results your selections produce) and you will see a completely different world of patterns and connections. But extensive backtracks together with the complete automation of the selection process and results evaluation will be required to see what's really cooking. Ask your AI (or any other intelligence, for that matter) if it can do it for you.

FYI dr San, I play by output statistics exclusively. Playing by inputs is like endlessly chasing my own tail and always failing - because it's not there.

"Wrong, dr San, there is such a strategy. Play all numbers and all possible combination. You are guaranteed a jackpot."

Whuuut?.. You cain't be serious right naah!

Well then, just throw the BaBy out wit the Bathwater..

Playa649?..I see ya still out at Sea ..Droownin
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,558
June 9, 2010
4,155 Posts
Offline

Nov 20, 2024, 12:07 am

hello mr -b-216, ok perfect thank you!

Creating a Complete Macro to Filter Pick 3 in Excel
Understanding the Problem:

Based on the description, the goal is to create a macro in Excel that filters a list of numbers from a lottery game (Pick 3) based on the following rules:

Ascending Order: The data is sorted by date, with the oldest at the top.
Digit Repetition: The macro should identify numbers where a digit moves to an adjacent position in the next draw.
Exclusions: Numbers that do not follow the movement pattern should be excluded from the filtering.
Macro Structure:

To create this macro, we will use Excel's VBA (Visual Basic for Applications). The macro will:

Read the data: From a specific worksheet.
Compare numbers: Analyze each number in relation to the previous one.
Apply filters: Mark the numbers that meet the criteria.
Display results: Show only the filtered numbers.
VBA Code:

VB.Net
Sub FilterPick3()
Dim ws As Worksheet
Dim lastRow As Long
Dim i As Long

' Set the worksheet where the data is located
Set ws = ThisWorkbook.Sheets("Sheet1") ' Replace "Sheet1" with the name of your worksheet

' Find the last row with data
lastRow = ws.Cells(ws.Rows.Count, "A").End(xlUp).Row

' Loop to analyze each row, starting from the second (since the first is the header)
For i = 2 To lastRow
' Extract the digits of the current and previous numbers
Dim num1 As String, num2 As String
num1 = ws.Cells(i, 1).Value
num2 = ws.Cells(i - 1, 1).Value

' Check the filter conditions
If Len(num1) = 3 And Len(num2) = 3 Then ' Check if both numbers have 3 digits
If IsNumeric(num1) And IsNumeric(num2) Then ' Check if both are numeric
' Logic to compare the digits and apply the filtering rules
' ... (implement the comparison logic here)
' Example (to be adapted):
If Mid(num1, 2, 1) = Mid(num2, 1, 1) And Mid(num1, 3, 1) = Mid(num2, 2, 1) Then
' Mark the row to be filtered (e.g. by coloring the row)
ws.Rows(i).Interior.ColorIndex = 6
End If
End If
End If
Next i

' Apply the filter based on the marked rows
' ... (implement the filtering logic here)
End Sub
Use code with caution.

Completing the Filtering Logic:

The most important part is the logic of comparison between the digits. You will need to analyze all the possible combinations of moving the digits and define the conditions for each case.

Example Logic:

VB.Net
If Mid(num1, 2, 1) = Mid(num2, 1, 1) And Mid(num1, 3, 1) = Mid(num2, 2, 1) Then
' Digit 2 of the previous number went to digit 1 of the current number
' Digit 3 of the previous number went to digit 2 of the current number
End If
Use code with caution.

Applying the Filter:

After marking the rows that meet the criteria, you can apply an automatic filter in Excel to display only the marked rows.

Notes:

Flexibility: Adapt the code to different data formats and filtering criteria.
Optimization: For large data sets, consider performance optimizations.
Visualization: Use colors or conditional formatting to highlight results.
Documentation: Add comments to your code to make it easier to understand.
Next Steps:

Define the rules: Complete the comparison logic for all possible cases.
Implement the filter: Use Excel's AutoFilter function to filter the data.
Test: Run the macro with different sets of data to verify that the results are correct.
Additional Help:

If you need more help, provide more detailed information about:

Data format: How are the numbers arranged in the worksheet?

Specific criteria: What are all the possible combinations of digit movements that you want to filter?

Expected results: Which numbers do you expect to be filtered?
With this information, I can help you create a custom macro for your needs.
Additional Resources:

VBA documentation: Refer to the official VBA documentation for more information about the available functions and objects.

Online communities: There are several online communities where you can find help and VBA code examples.
Remember, this is just a starting point. Creating a complete macro depends on your specific needs.
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,558
June 9, 2010
4,155 Posts
Offline

Nov 20, 2024, 6:28 am

Example of a custom configuration:

Filter: Combination of causal and synchronistic filter

Criteria:

Causal:
Select only numbers that have appeared at least 3 times in the last 20 draws.
The sum of the three numbers must be a multiple of 5.
Synchronistic:
At least one number must be prime.
No numbers can be repeated in the combination.
Rationale:

The frequency of the numbers in the last draws indicates a possible trend.
The sum of the numbers as a multiple of 5 adds a numerical criterion.
Prime numbers are chosen by their random nature and do not follow obvious patterns.
Avoiding repeated numbers increases the variability of the combinations.
Creating your configuration:

To create your custom configuration, we can follow these steps:

Choose the filters: Define which types of filters you want to use (causal, synchronistic or both).
Set the criteria: Determine the specific criteria for each filter (e.g. minimum frequency, sequence type, etc.).
Combine filters: Combine the criteria from different filters to create a more complex strategy.
Test your setup: Use historical data to test the effectiveness of your setup and adjust it as needed.
Important:

No guarantee of success: Remember that the lottery is a game of chance and no strategy guarantees winning.
Diversification: It is recommended to diversify your bets, using different filter setups.
Bankroll management: Set a limit for your bets and do not bet more than you can afford to lose.
Other ideas to explore:

Statistical analysis: Use statistical software to analyze the data and identify more complex patterns.
Artificial intelligence: Explore the use of machine learning algorithms to predict outcomes.
Game theory: Apply concepts from game theory to analyze the strategies of other players.
Would you like to explore any of these ideas or create a custom setup based on your criteria?

I can help you with:

More detailed explanations of the different types of filters.
Suggestions for filter combinations.
Probability calculations (simplified).
Recommendations for data analysis tools.
Share your ideas and together we can develop a more personalized strategy for the Pick 3 lottery!
Mr-B 216

Ohio
United States
Member #179,973
February 15, 2017
1,333 Posts
Offline

Nov 20, 2024, 10:09 am

Quote: Originally posted by Player649 on Nov 19, 2024
You are correct, the trick is to predict when doubles may start showing up.

There might be a way.

Data compiled by Mr-B-216 indicates that in the long run doubles frequency oscillates around 27%, as supposed to be. But in the short term this % may oscillate from as low as 10% to as high as 50% in 20 draws (these are my observations from the past, not statistics which need to be computed). Pick 3 is a dynamic lottery where significant deviations from average tend to revert to average quite quickly. Therefore observing what's THE CURRENT percentage of doubles in short term is crucial. There is no guarantee but as the percentage drops the probability for a double greatly increases.

One of the issues to resolve here is the determination of what constitutes short term: 20 latest draws, 30, in between, more than 30, less than 20, variable? Which one is the most accurate as a predictor, perhaps any at a given time? I only ran some very basic singles/doubles ratio statistics and this would have to be refined and backtrack tested for efficiency. But I believe the general idea is sound.

At this moment I don't have time to look into this issue in depth as I'm upgrading my 649 methodology (new wheels + backtracks) but perhaps early next year. Programming would be necessary, this is not stuff for a spreadsheet. Python is easy, I just tried it 2 months ago for a wheel evaluator and I like it.

Here is data from the most recent 60 Drawings in OH Pick 3. I always use a top to bottom reading list, with the oldest drawing on top.

The numbers represent the number of consecutive Singles drawn before a Double was drawn.
Single 1
Single 3
Single 1
Single 5
Single 2
Single 1
Single 5
Single 10
Single 5
Single 1
Single 6
Single 1

Actual 41 68.33%
Expected 43 71.67%

The numbers represent the number of consecutive Doubles drawn before a Single was drawn.
Double 1
Double 2
Double 1
Double 1
Double 3
Double 1
Double 1
Double 1
Double 3
Double 4
Double 1

Actual 19 31.67%
Expected 17 28.33%

Those same 60 drawings, in order, top to bottom:

230
Single 1
477
Double 1
956
351
750
Single 3
664
133
Double 2
960
Single 1
990
Double 1
153
260
640
691
789
Single 5
700
Double 1
58
670
Single 2
112
399
600
Double 3
619
Single 1
599
Double 1
382
342
896
972
834
Single 5
115
Double 1
307
926
203
596
568
713
498
210
913
516
Single 10
772
Double 1
348
65
49
259
837
Single 5
445
575
399
Double 3
183
Single 1
636
110
833
551
Double 4
850
487
470
329
745
832
Single 6
554
Double 1
247
Single 1

I believe one approach is to keep running totals for Singles and Doubles over a period of around 15-20 draws. When the number of Double hits falls below the expected number of hits of around 4 to 6, AND the consecutive Single count is maybe around 5 or above, then start playing the Doubles. No concrete data to back this up just yet, it's just a thought to go along with what Player649 said.

What goes around comes around.
alchemist7

United States
Member #65,709
October 4, 2008
177 Posts
Offline

Nov 20, 2024, 7:56 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Mr-B 216 on Nov 20, 2024
Here is data from the most recent 60 Drawings in OH Pick 3. I always use a top to bottom reading list, with the oldest drawing on top.

The numbers represent the number of consecutive Singles drawn before a Double was drawn.
Single 1
Single 3
Single 1
Single 5
Single 2
Single 1
Single 5
Single 10
Single 5
Single 1
Single 6
Single 1

Actual 41 68.33%
Expected 43 71.67%

The numbers represent the number of consecutive Doubles drawn before a Single was drawn.
Double 1
Double 2
Double 1
Double 1
Double 3
Double 1
Double 1
Double 1
Double 3
Double 4
Double 1

Actual 19 31.67%
Expected 17 28.33%

Those same 60 drawings, in order, top to bottom:

230
Single 1
477
Double 1
956
351
750
Single 3
664
133
Double 2
960
Single 1
990
Double 1
153
260
640
691
789
Single 5
700
Double 1
58
670
Single 2
112
399
600
Double 3
619
Single 1
599
Double 1
382
342
896
972
834
Single 5
115
Double 1
307
926
203
596
568
713
498
210
913
516
Single 10
772
Double 1
348
65
49
259
837
Single 5
445
575
399
Double 3
183
Single 1
636
110
833
551
Double 4
850
487
470
329
745
832
Single 6
554
Double 1
247
Single 1

I believe one approach is to keep running totals for Singles and Doubles over a period of around 15-20 draws. When the number of Double hits falls below the expected number of hits of around 4 to 6, AND the consecutive Single count is maybe around 5 or above, then start playing the Doubles. No concrete data to back this up just yet, it's just a thought to go along with what Player649 said.

Diamond Palace and I Went down a rabbit hole with trying to predict singles, doubles and triples. We looked at the pattern by months and years if I remembered correctly. We lined up the first through the 30th of every month if three months 1st had a single then we would look out for a double on the fourth month. And we went down the line and I think I lined them up by years in the same fashion. It's a rabbit hole to explore!
Player649

Canada
Member #218,115
October 17, 2021
171 Posts
Offline

Nov 21, 2024, 1:32 am

Quote: Originally posted by Mr-B 216 on Nov 20, 2024
Here is data from the most recent 60 Drawings in OH Pick 3. I always use a top to bottom reading list, with the oldest drawing on top.

The numbers represent the number of consecutive Singles drawn before a Double was drawn.
Single 1
Single 3
Single 1
Single 5
Single 2
Single 1
Single 5
Single 10
Single 5
Single 1
Single 6
Single 1

Actual 41 68.33%
Expected 43 71.67%

The numbers represent the number of consecutive Doubles drawn before a Single was drawn.
Double 1
Double 2
Double 1
Double 1
Double 3
Double 1
Double 1
Double 1
Double 3
Double 4
Double 1

Actual 19 31.67%
Expected 17 28.33%

Those same 60 drawings, in order, top to bottom:

230
Single 1
477
Double 1
956
351
750
Single 3
664
133
Double 2
960
Single 1
990
Double 1
153
260
640
691
789
Single 5
700
Double 1
58
670
Single 2
112
399
600
Double 3
619
Single 1
599
Double 1
382
342
896
972
834
Single 5
115
Double 1
307
926
203
596
568
713
498
210
913
516
Single 10
772
Double 1
348
65
49
259
837
Single 5
445
575
399
Double 3
183
Single 1
636
110
833
551
Double 4
850
487
470
329
745
832
Single 6
554
Double 1
247
Single 1

I believe one approach is to keep running totals for Singles and Doubles over a period of around 15-20 draws. When the number of Double hits falls below the expected number of hits of around 4 to 6, AND the consecutive Single count is maybe around 5 or above, then start playing the Doubles. No concrete data to back this up just yet, it's just a thought to go along with what Player649 said.

This can be one of the approaches to timing doubles. Most likely others can be identified as well. Backtracks will show which one is more effective at any given time. You don't have to be correct every time. Depending on payout 1 in 2 or even 1 in 3 will do. Besides, the intention is NOT to play every time but only when the timing conditions are favorable. Your results indicate there are such conditions.

If you intend to pursue this idea further - good luck. It may lead somewhere. My intention was to just give an idea.
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,558
June 9, 2010
4,155 Posts
Offline

Nov 22, 2024, 7:04 am

hello, mr-126, it's about predicting the first digit of pick3, e.g. if it was predicted that it will be the digit 4, we only have 99 combinations from 400 to 499 without filtering = let's see = That said, we can explore some approaches that, although they do not guarantee success, can offer interesting insights:

1. Historical Statistical Analysis:
Frequency of numbers: Identify which numbers appear most frequently as the first digit.
Sequences: Analyze if there are sequences of numbers or repetitive patterns.
Distribution: Check if the distribution of numbers is uniform or if there is any trend.
Tools: Spreadsheets, statistical software (R, Python), databases.

2. Set Theory:
Combinations: Calculate all possible combinations of the first digit and analyze the probabilities.
Intersections and unions: Identify sets of numbers that appear most frequently together.
Tools: Spreadsheets, mathematical software.

3. Probability Models:
Probability distributions: Apply distributions such as binomial or Poisson to model the occurrence of events.
Simulations: Perform Monte Carlo simulations to generate random data and test different hypotheses.
Tools: Statistical software, programming languages (Python, R).

4. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:
Neural networks: Train neural networks with historical data to identify complex patterns.
Machine learning: Use supervised or unsupervised learning algorithms to find patterns in data.
Tools: Deep learning frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch), programming languages (Python).

5. Technical Analysis (with caution):
Graphs: Create graphs to visualize the evolution of numbers over time.
Indicators: Use technical indicators, such as moving averages, to identify possible trends.
Tools: Technical analysis platforms, charting software.

Limitations and Considerations:

Randomness: Even with complex analyses, the randomness of the lottery always prevails.

Overfitting: It is easy to find patterns in random data, but these patterns may not hold up in the future.

Cost: Developing and maintaining complex systems can be expensive and time-consuming.

Ethics: Promoting the idea that it is possible to consistently predict lottery outcomes can be considered misleading.

Conclusion:

Predicting the first digit of the Pick 3 is a challenge that involves elements of statistics, probability, artificial intelligence, and even a little luck. No approach is foolproof, and it is important to remember that the lottery is a game of chance.
JustMaybe

us
Member #228,334
January 2, 2023
1,493 Posts
Offline

Nov 22, 2024, 5:19 pm

Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Nov 22, 2024
hello, mr-126, it's about predicting the first digit of pick3, e.g. if it was predicted that it will be the digit 4, we only have 99 combinations from 400 to 499 without filtering = let's see = That said, we can explore some approaches that, although they do not guarantee success, can offer interesting insights:

1. Historical Statistical Analysis:
Frequency of numbers: Identify which numbers appear most frequently as the first digit.
Sequences: Analyze if there are sequences of numbers or repetitive patterns.
Distribution: Check if the distribution of numbers is uniform or if there is any trend.
Tools: Spreadsheets, statistical software (R, Python), databases.

2. Set Theory:
Combinations: Calculate all possible combinations of the first digit and analyze the probabilities.
Intersections and unions: Identify sets of numbers that appear most frequently together.
Tools: Spreadsheets, mathematical software.

3. Probability Models:
Probability distributions: Apply distributions such as binomial or Poisson to model the occurrence of events.
Simulations: Perform Monte Carlo simulations to generate random data and test different hypotheses.
Tools: Statistical software, programming languages (Python, R).

4. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:
Neural networks: Train neural networks with historical data to identify complex patterns.
Machine learning: Use supervised or unsupervised learning algorithms to find patterns in data.
Tools: Deep learning frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch), programming languages (Python).

5. Technical Analysis (with caution):
Graphs: Create graphs to visualize the evolution of numbers over time.
Indicators: Use technical indicators, such as moving averages, to identify possible trends.
Tools: Technical analysis platforms, charting software.

Limitations and Considerations:

Randomness: Even with complex analyses, the randomness of the lottery always prevails.

Overfitting: It is easy to find patterns in random data, but these patterns may not hold up in the future.

Cost: Developing and maintaining complex systems can be expensive and time-consuming.

Ethics: Promoting the idea that it is possible to consistently predict lottery outcomes can be considered misleading.

Conclusion:

Predicting the first digit of the Pick 3 is a challenge that involves elements of statistics, probability, artificial intelligence, and even a little luck. No approach is foolproof, and it is important to remember that the lottery is a game of chance.

Conclusion:

Predicting the first digit of the Pick 3 is a challenge that involves elements of statistics, probability, artificial intelligence, and even a little luck. No approach is foolproof, and it is important to remember that the lottery is a game of chance.

There is absolutely nothing more to add.

I got my QP ready for the weekend draws.

I believe winning the lottery jackpot is a 💯 % factor of luck.

May Fortuna, goddess of chance or lot vindicate me.

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Further Exploring the Relationship Between Quantum Mechanics and Luck Great choice!Prev TopicNext Topic

Further Exploring the Relationship Between Quantum Mechanics and Luck Great choice!Prev Topic Next Topic