George, the way I have played with V-tracs in the past, to make it easier for me to convert them without confusion between the Lotto numbers and the V-trac numbers, and in a faster way, is real simple. This was not intended to change anyone else's system, but just to keep it simple. I think LottoScorp did a fantastic job at this and his concept is great.
For your matrix out there I would say:
111 (666) = VT1
222 (777) = VT2
333 (888) = VT3
444 (999) = VT4
555 (000) = VT 5
Every time you see one of the actual numbers it needs to be converted to its sister number for each track. The vtrac ID stays within the actual numbers. I never started it with a 0 either but with a 1. That's how I do my sister numbers and if I want to use them under the v-trac system then my v-trac ID numbers will go along with the actual (line) numbers and its corresponding "sister" number - real easy to remember.
So, let's say for the last 8 TX (combined) winning numbers it will be:
(I hope I am printing them correctly, but for the example this will work).
No. VTrac(EasyWay)
199 = 144
634 = 134
234 = 234
343 = 343
972 = 422
743 = 243
385 = 335
706 = 251
486= 431
I really have liked working it this way, whenever I have applied the method.