Rotten Egg poll...Prev TopicNext Topic

• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  May 25, 2003, 8:07 am

  ▲▼
  CA is a MUSL member; however, they joined because of the proposed "international" game.

  FL's previous governor approved PB; Jeb Bush vetoed the game.
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  May 27, 2003, 10:03 am

  ▲▼

  A very good argument can be made that CA, FL, and TX should form a third alliance, to compete with PB and MM (again, CA has no intention to sell PB.)
• lottoscorp

  United States
  Member #60
  October 28, 2001
  455 Posts
  Offline
  May 27, 2003, 10:14 am

  ▲▼

  I am
• lottoscorp

  United States
  Member #60
  October 28, 2001
  455 Posts
  Offline
  May 27, 2003, 10:18 am

  ▲▼

  It
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  May 27, 2003, 12:53 pm

  ▲▼
  Lottoscorp:

  I read somewhere that TX can break up into five states "whenever they want".
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  May 30, 2003, 2:02 am

  ▲▼

  I read there was/is a fairly recent movement for northern California (and southern Oregon) to become its own state. Of course, this is not the proper forum for that discussion, but, you have to wonder how lotteries would be affected if state lines were changed, added, or removed. After all, look at the many changes of international boundaries in just the last 15 years in eastern Europe.