Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 9, 2016, 4:45 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lotto 649 Played Differently!!

Topic closed. 2 replies. Last post 13 years ago by dvdiva.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink

Will A 649 Lotto Played As 642 Lotto Omitting ANY SEVEN Numbers Give BETTER Odds?!

Yes, It Could Significantly Improve Odds! [ 1 ]  [25.00%]
Don't Think The Result Would Be Any Different! [ 1 ]  [25.00%]
Atrocious!! I Love ALL 49 Numbers! [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
YES, It's All About Timing Your Bets, Boy! [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Hmm...A Novelty! Worth A Try! [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Have Tried It. It WORKED For Me Conistently! [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Have Tried It. It's Sheer Rubbish Concept! [ 1 ]  [25.00%]
Guess I Can Improvize On That! [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Well, I Did It DIFFERENTLY! [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Just Devilish And Wild...No Harm In Trying Once! [ 1 ]  [25.00%]
Total Valid Votes [ 4 ]  
Discarded Votes [ 5 ]  
Avatar
Bangalore
India
Member #2444
October 4, 2003
234 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 10, 2003, 1:06 am - IP Logged

Dear Lotto Lovers,

I Guess We All Have Had Very Little To Talk About The Most Common Big Lotto, 6 Out Of 49 (649 Lotto) And Discussing Mostly Pick 3/4.

This Poll Is Just To Give This Lotto A Fresh Lease Of Life And Try To Discover New Grounds, Ideas, And Inputs.

Hope You Enjoy Polling.

More GreenBacks To You!

DreamLotto

    RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
    mid-Ohio
    United States
    Member #9
    March 24, 2001
    19830 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 10, 2003, 2:31 am - IP Logged
    Quote: Originally posted by DreamLotto on October 10, 2003



     This Poll Is Just To Give This Lotto A Fresh Lease Of Life And Try To Discover New Grounds, Ideas, And Inputs.

     








    Isn't this poll just a way to post a link to your website for free?  People know B.S. when they smell it.

    RJOh

      dvdiva's avatar - 8ball

      United States
      Member #2338
      September 17, 2003
      2063 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 10, 2003, 11:37 pm - IP Logged

      whats wrong with the s