Same Number Set For 649 Lottery!Prev TopicNext Topic

• DreamLotto

  

  Bangalore
  India
  Member #2,444
  October 4, 2003
  234 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 11, 2003, 10:55 am

  ▲▼

  Hi Lotto Friends,

  This Poll Is To Judge How Many Of You Think "There's Sure Strength In SAME Numbers Played Over 52 Weeks"

  Hope You Enjoy Polling...

  GreenBacks To You,

  DreamLotto
• fja

  

  100

  United States
  Member #91
  January 19, 2002
  16,125 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 14, 2003, 1:51 pm

  ▲▼

  The only thing i've noticed is a small hit every few draws, nothing great, but it is consistent.

  "Everybody has to believe in something...I believe I'll have another beer!"   = W.C.Fields 
• lottoking

  www.winnerslost .com;www.649-lottery.com
  China
  Member #2,526
  October 15, 2003
  976 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 18, 2003, 5:49 pm

  ▲▼

  you dont have to hit the same numbers.you can only get small prizes but never the winning number.

  nansen
• Irvin

  

  New Zealand
  Member #2,234
  September 2, 2003
  173 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 18, 2003, 9:19 pm

  ▲▼

  Finding some decent numbers to start with would be the problem. And I think 52 weeks for the same set is too long. Shorter periods would probably be better in my case probably 10 to 14 weeks.
  
  
  
  On average you can pick all 6 numbers from the last 10 draws And could probably use these to play the next 4 draws.
  
  
  
  
• DreamLotto

  

  Bangalore
  India
  Member #2,444
  October 4, 2003
  234 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 26, 2003, 3:06 am

  ▲▼

  Hi Irvin:

  Thanks for your clue. I tested the idea with some modification using LottoHat. Here's how I did it:

  1.  Setting 18 numbers (18 HOT numbers including 3 from past draw). The logic of using only hot numbers is that some of them are "growth" numbers (my own concept), even if they are not in the top rung of hot number category, they are likely to come up and even may supersede current, so called 'hot' numbers!
  2.  Filters used were sum of numbers, width of line, and consecutive.
  3. Against the above settings, I now prepared 3-4 sets of 108 bets each using random (well, CONSTRAINED randomness...LOL, because of the filters and settings) selections from "selected numbers and filters" option.
  4. The above bets were then tested against past draws for a 12-week period. The results have been encouraging with multiple 2, 3, 4, and even a few FIVE HITS!! I now wonder if with some addition of cold numbers and manipulation, this strategy could be modified some day towards winning the BIG ONE!

  One good thing about one of our 649 Lotto (12-draws-old Arunachal MaxLotto) is that it allows a win for even matching two numbers! There are NO extra balls, just 2 to 6 match wins!

  Now I want to test this for real in a few weeks, using SAME set of SWEET N HOT 18s!

  Tell me if you have any improvements to suggest!

  Good Luck
• DreamLotto

  

  Bangalore
  India
  Member #2,444
  October 4, 2003
  234 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 26, 2003, 3:40 am

  ▲▼

  Dear All,

  I guess players of smaller lotteries will benefit if they improvize on the above concept/system. Keep us posted us of your developments!

  Good Luck!
• BobP

  

  Dump Water Florida
  United States
  Member #380
  June 5, 2002
  3,579 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 26, 2003, 10:21 am

  ▲▼

  Had fair luck playing 14 15 18 19 22 23 26 27 30 31 34 35 38 39 42 43 46 47 on a six line pair wheel until I got bored.  BobP
  
• DreamLotto

  

  Bangalore
  India
  Member #2,444
  October 4, 2003
  234 Posts
  Offline
  Oct 26, 2003, 11:16 am

  ▲▼

  Hi Friend,

  I guess innovation keeps boredom at bay...LOL

  GreenBacks to you!

  PS: I am surprised there are no numbers below 14 in your selection above! Is supersition your syndicate director/member?! LOL