Thanks, everyone.
This certainly was C2, the next generation of the CRUNCH. It is not officially out yet, it needs quite abit more work. I am working on some examples for the product. This was one of them. It is a complete rewrite. I menitoned before, the structure is different, all fitlers are part of the input now, and that opens way more options, but might need a bit to get used too.
The new design allows you to create you own systems, like the one that I used for Georgia. Here the entire output that brought this result as an example of the new CRUNCH "look":
INPUT DATA:
<AddList:NumberClasses>/This creates a list of all numbers
S, B
<SelectFilter:KeyNumbers> /Using the last two draws as Key Numbers
8, 7, 6, 8, 9, 7
<UnselectFilter:KeyNumbers> /Get rid of the ones that appeared twice
8, 7
<UnselectFilter:Pairs> /Get rid of the pairs from last 4 draws that were no doubles
54, 10
<UnselectFilter:Sums> /As in Crunch 1 delete sums from 0 to 4 and 23 to 27
00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
<SelectFilter:RelHighMediumLowNumbers> /Usimg the opposite Relative High-Medium-Low selection of the last draw!
LMH
<SetSort:Roots> /I had to sort the results by someyhing, I decided on Roots!
OUTPUT DATA:
Results: 32
Roots: 1(3)
046(1), 136(1), 469(1)
Roots: 6(3)
069(1), 159(1), 249(1)
Roots: 7(3)
169(1), 259(1), 349(1)
Roots: 8(3)
026(1), 269(1), 359(1)
Roots: 9(3)
036(1), 126(1), 369(1)
Roots: 3(4)
039(1), 129(1), 156(1), 246(1)
Roots: 4(4)
049(1), 139(1), 256(1), 346(1)
Roots: 5(4)
059(1), 149(1), 239(1), 356(1)
Roots: 2(5)
029(1), 056(1), 146(1), 236(1), 569(1)
So the only issue was the LMH selection. I should have decided on the same as in the previous draw HML. That would have created the better line:
Roots: 5(4)
653(1), 932(1), 941(1), 950(1)
Thanks again and GOOD LUCK!