Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 11, 2016, 3:00 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lottosync

Topic closed. 32 replies. Last post 12 years ago by paul762.

Page 1 of 3
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
Fergus
Canada
Member #5532
July 9, 2004
87 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 2, 2004, 4:34 pm - IP Logged

 

Guru:  It's a new month and I was wondering how 1.8 is coming along...is it close

Raziel

    Avatar

    Canada
    Member #2859
    November 23, 2003
    463 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 3, 2004, 7:48 pm - IP Logged

    I would be willing to be a guinea pig and test a pre-beta version for my keno


      Belgium
      Member #2220
      September 2, 2003
      553 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 4, 2004, 3:33 am - IP Logged

      Hi,

      1.8 is coming along well. A beta should be available somewhere half november.

      Last saturday I ran the prediction on the belgian lotto. Just 6 numbers predicted. This was the result.

      Lottosync  prediction   7  10  19  20  21  39

      the draw was              7    9  19  20  21  38  +bonus 40

      4 correct and two numbers just 1 too high. With just 6 numbers predicted, it was very close.

      When the beta is released, I plan to restart the live test here at the forum.

        Avatar

        Canada
        Member #2859
        November 23, 2003
        463 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: October 4, 2004, 3:49 am - IP Logged

        wow that's REALLY GOOD Guru, EXCELLENT results [ you just missed all 6 numbers by off 1's] HOLY COW !!!!!

        can't wait to try it, can we play with the beta around mid november then, luv to try it on keno.

        Again congrats on the GREAT Belgian results !!!!

        Lottosynch has already brought me alot of money, and i just have this feeling that it's just gunna get better for us lottosynch users !!!!!

          paul762's avatar - lion

          United Kingdom
          Member #3002
          December 11, 2003
          477 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: October 4, 2004, 7:19 am - IP Logged

          guru, great result! how l&#


            Belgium
            Member #2220
            September 2, 2003
            553 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: October 4, 2004, 7:28 am - IP Logged

            Paul:

            It ran 10 hours on my 2gigherz laptop

              Avatar
              N.ireland
              United Kingdom
              Member #2962
              December 6, 2003
              69 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: October 4, 2004, 2:18 pm - IP Logged

               Lets keep our feet on the ground this time round.1.6. and 1.7. cost me plenty in lost bets.Time well tell if 1.8 . can break even anything else will be  a bonus.

                LANTERN's avatar - kilroy 28_173_reasonably_small.jpg
                Tx
                United States
                Member #4570
                May 4, 2004
                5180 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: October 4, 2004, 2:48 pm - IP Logged

                Yes, time will tell, but I sure hope that it will be able to do better than just break even, I would like it to do a lot lot better than just break even, if it just breaks even then it is no good, just wasted time and effort, after all, it will keep your PC tied up for a very long long time.

                Breaking just even is no good, take as long as you want making it, but make it very very good, please.

                If I just wanted to break even I would not bother to play at all, by not playing, I would already be breaking even.

                Good luck.

                BibleOnline  ParishesOnline  ChristianRadioOnline   MassOnline   Mass

                "Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."

                  RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                  mid-Ohio
                  United States
                  Member #9
                  March 24, 2001
                  19831 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: October 4, 2004, 4:00 pm - IP Logged
                  Quote: Originally posted by LANTERN on October 04, 2004



                  If I just wanted to break even I would not bother to play at all, by not playing, I would already be breaking even.







                  Breaking even when playing a lottery to me means you are playing for nothing.  Not playing at all means you are not even in the game.  Do you really believe that playing for millions of dollars at no cost is the same as not playing at all? 

                  RJOh

                   * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                     
                               Evil Looking       


                    Belgium
                    Member #2220
                    September 2, 2003
                    553 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: October 5, 2004, 2:50 am - IP Logged

                    Breaking even in a lottery game is not good, it is excellent. This is because all lotteries are designed for the majority to loose a lot of money on the long run. Lotteries handle at least a 1 to 36 chance of winning the lowest prize. It's even worse in most big jackpot lotteries. Guessing will most probably not bring you even close to breaking even unless you get extremely lucky and win a top prize.

                    Think about it, you are gonna play lotto anyway. What do you prefer, breaking even or loosing your money big time. If a system can make you break even, then it also has the potential to make you a big winner.

                      lottoshlep's avatar - super 7-top-over.jpg
                      BC
                      Canada
                      Member #2120
                      August 19, 2003
                      258 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: October 5, 2004, 3:02 am - IP Logged
                      Quote: O

                      if at first you don't succeed ... destroy all evidence you ever tried  Cool 

                        paul762's avatar - lion

                        United Kingdom
                        Member #3002
                        December 11, 2003
                        477 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: October 5, 2004, 6:28 am - IP Logged

                        if the majority of predictions end up like the one you posted, who can ask for more.

                          Avatar
                          N.ireland
                          United Kingdom
                          Member #2962
                          December 6, 2003
                          69 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: October 5, 2004, 8:36 am - IP Logged

                           

                                                        "IF"


                            Belgium
                            Member #2220
                            September 2, 2003
                            553 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: October 5, 2004, 9:00 am - IP Logged

                            Paul and others:

                            The majority of predictions with all numbers landing so close is a little utopic. If that could be established I would win the lottery 20 times or more in a year simply by deviating the result a little up and down and playing all possible combinations with the base and deviated numbers.

                            No, you can expect to encounter very close results with so little numbers predicted reasonably frequent, but certainly not all the time.


                              Belgium
                              Member #2220
                              September 2, 2003
                              553 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: October 5, 2004, 9:12 am - IP Logged

                              We are thinking about also releasing a less expensive version of Lottosync 1.8

                              A version (all features included) where you can buy prediction credits. This would allow you to try the software for X number of times for a fairly low price tag. When your credits are all used, you can decide to leave it at that or buy new credits. Or ultimatly you can decide buying the unlimited version (at the current price) wich also includes unlimited future upgrades for free.

                              Our current customers would ofcourse receive the future upgrades too.

                              It's just a thought at the moment. I would like to know what you guys think about this.