eddessaknight's Blog

The animals Muslims will slaughter in Hamtramck, Michigan, for their torturous “religious celebration” must be Halal, a Jihad money-making scheme to spread Sharia worldwide.

The Muslim-controlled City of Hamtramck, Michigan, approved the slaughter of animals at residents’ homes for “religious reasons.” The City Council, whose members are all sharia-compliant Muslims, approved the torturous, inhumane,

nsanitary Sharia practice that among other Islamic causes, helps

aid Islamic terrorists, 3-2, last Tuesday. 

Hamtramck has one of the highest percentages of Muslim

residents among cities in the U.S. Last December, the Council voted to keep a ban in place, but after fierce objections from resident Muslims, the issue was revisited.

During the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, Muslims perform ‘Qurbani’ (barbaric live animal slaughter). The holiday is celebrated by Muslims worldwide and highlighted by torturing and killing terrified animals in the public square. For Hamtramck residents, this means they will slaughter large animals barbarically in their backyard yards or inside their homes.

Muslims prefer heavier sheep, goats, lamb, buffalo, cattle, and camels to slaughter for this holiday. The weights of the animals for slaughter should be heavier than 60 pounds.

 

 

The revised ordinance requires those who barbarically slaughter the animals to “notify” the City ahead of time and to perform their slaughter in a way more or less compliant with health regulations. The City has also over-written many health codes by allowing the slaughter of animals in the Halal fashion at a person’s residence.

The City requires that Muslims block the viewing of the slaughter from members of the general public who do not wish to see the dying animal suffering. So instead, the public will be treated to listen to the screams of the animal dying, no matter how they feel about the Islamic practice.

Halal

The animals that Muslims slaughter for the “celebration” must be Halal. An Islamic practice and “certification” that has been weaponized to spread Sharia throughout the world.

Halal, which in Arabic means lawful or legal, is a term designating any object or action permissible according to Sharia (Islamic Law). In the context of food, halal meat is derived from animals slaughtered by hand according to methods stipulated in Islamic religious texts.

Sharia bans the practice of stunning the animals before they are slaughtered. This is because pre-slaughter stunning renders the animals unconscious and thus is said to lessen pain.

Muslims slaughter the animal facing Mecca. Halal slaughter involves cutting the animal’s trachea, esophagus, and jugular vein. Muslims hang the tortured animals by their back feet while they let the blood slowly drain from their writhing body while praying and saying “Bismillah Allahu akbar” — in the name of Allah the greatest. They have to say this prayer about Allah being great and greater than all other gods.

It is important to highlight that according to the Quran, halal meat is not even strictly compulsory for Muslims. If it isn’t available, they can eat non-halal, and Allah will forgive them. So there’s no good reason why we should import it into our society when it violates our most basic standards of animal welfare, which are not particularly high in the first place.

Islamic Halal Certification

Furthermore, for a food or product to be labeled “halal,” it must be certified by Islamic organizations. The majority are Muslim terrorist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. One of the halal certification organizations, for example, is the Islamic Society of North America, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror trial because it was tied to the terror group Hamas, which is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Various Muslim Brotherhood front groups have devised this lucrative racket of certifying non-meat foods as halal and major companies have been lining up to pay them handsomely for certification. This is effectively an Islamic tax on food that funds the further expansion of Islam into western society.

Halal food is a brilliant political and economic strategy for Islamic terrorist cult groups.

 

 

By

•  Martin Martin

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My friends and I, who are religion-free (otherwise known as atheist), are debating how to respond to people who tell us to “Have a blessed day” or use any other religious sign off. It’s especially frustrating and offensive in what should be religion-free places of business, such as the doctor’s office or a public agency.

While we don’t want to be rude, and we know some people may not even understand why it is offensive and genuinely think they are being nice, we also don’t want the obvious proselytizing and forced religious exchange to go unchecked.

It’s tempting to respond with “Under his eye” or to explain that it’s offensive, but that would mean revealing private information about our personal religious status. And when you reveal you aren’t religious to someone who is, you risk being treated badly.

Instead, we almost always end up gritting our teeth and replying “You, too” or “Have a nice day” and letting it go. But it wears on us and makes us feel unwelcome and discriminated against. And it’s becoming more and more prevalent.

Is there a polite way to respond that also gently tells the other person that that phrase is inappropriate and unwelcome?

GENTLE READER: Although you and your friends are religion-free, language is not. Even “goodbye” derives from “God be with ye.” People who bless you when you sneeze would be puzzled to be accused of forcing their religion on you.

As you are against bringing religion into public discourse, Miss Manners wonders why you are even tempted to open such discussions. Explaining your position is surely an opening for others to explain theirs. She suggests that you continue to tolerate conventional cliches and stop taking them personally."

Biden's open border 'way past out of control': Cabrera

"Your World" features National Border Patrol Council VP Chris Cabrera as he reacts to the White House saying that the lifting of Title 42 doesn't mean the border is open.

hite House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was unable to specify on Vice President Kamala Harris' role at the border. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was unable to specify on Vice President Kamala Harris' role at the border. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Christian graves on consecrated ground desecrated in historic Holy Land Jerusalem cemetery