USA Mega

Lottery Places

The time is now 5:14 pm

You last visited
June 5, 2026, 12:00 pm

All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Home › Blogs › MADDOG10's Blog

MADDOG10's Blog

Page 132 of 147

Round 3 Part 2

Southside Johnny had his A** handed to him ..

He has no clue what the hell this Country is going through. His policies are that of left over hand out from previous Democrats.

He can try to sell himself that he cares. Well, if he cared so much and cared about he would have mentioned the Costitution and Defense of these United States, but not ONE utter.   HE DOES NOT CARE ONE IODA PERIOD...

I counted his (But) words to gather his thoughts for the first hour and he said ( but ) 97 times...!

Yes folks Southside johnny got his ( BUTT ) handed to him.     This is the person who has lead us almost into another dimension, I THINK NOT.....!!!

Entry #233

Round 3 Part 1

As I watch the debate, I see Southside Johnny getting his Butt whipped in the first three segments.

"O" keeps repeating what he'll do over and over again ( NO Teleprompter).

His finness is no longer there, and keeps interjecting slang from the mid-west.

He is lost when Mr.Romney talks of how he'll get the Economy, and deficit down.   He's clueless..

Entry #232

Shoes on the OTHER foot on this one...

The spine of Obama’s speech is a parable about a pregnant woman shot in the  stomach during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The baby is born with a bullet in her  arm, which doctors successfully remove. That bullet, Obama explains, is a  metaphor for the problems facing black America, namely racism. (At a similar  speech he gave in April of 2007 at the First AME Church in Los Angeles to  commemorate the 15th anniversary of the riots, according to a church member who  was there, Obama described the slug as, “the bullet of slavery and Jim  Crow.”)

At least 53 people were killed during the chaos in Los Angeles, many of them  targeted by mobs because of their skin color. But Obama does not describe the  riots as an expression of racism, but rather as the result of it. The burning  and shooting and looting, he explains, amounted to “Los Angeles expressing a  lingering, ongoing, pervasive legacy, a tragic legacy out of the tragic history  of this country, a history this country has never fully come to terms with.”

And with that, Obama pivots to his central point: The Los Angeles riots and  Hurricane Katrina have racism in common. “The federal response after Katrina was  similar to the response we saw after the riots in LA,” he thunders from the  podium. “People in Washington, they wake up, they’re surprised: ‘There’s poverty  in our midst! Folks are frustrated! Black people angry!’ Then there’s gonna be  some panels, and hearings, and there are commissions and there are reports, and  then there’s some aid money, although we don’t always know where it’s going — it  can’t seem to get to the people who need it — and nothin’ really changes, except  the news coverage quiets down and Anderson Cooper is on to something else.”

It’s at about this point that Obama pauses, apparently agitated, and tells  the crowd that he wants to give “one example because this really steams me up,” an example that he notes does not appear in his prepared remarks:

LISTEN TO THE DIFFERENCE:

 

“Down in New Orleans, where they still have not rebuilt twenty months later,” he begins, “there’s a law, federal law — when you get reconstruction money from  the federal government — called the Stafford Act. And basically it says, when  you get federal money, you gotta give a ten percent match. The local  government’s gotta come up with ten percent. Every ten dollars the federal  government comes up with, local government’s gotta give a dollar.”

 
 

“Now here’s the thing,” Obama continues, “when 9-11 happened in New York  City, they waived the Stafford Act — said, ‘This is too serious a problem. We  can’t expect New York City to rebuild on its own. Forget that dollar you gotta  put in. Well, here’s ten dollars.’ And that was the right thing to do. When  Hurricane Andrew struck in Florida, people said, ‘Look at this devastation. We  don’t expect you to come up with y’own money, here. Here’s the money to rebuild.  We’re not gonna wait for you to scratch it together — because you’re part of the  American family.’”

That’s not, Obama says, what is happening in majority-black New Orleans. “What’s happening down in New Orleans? Where’s your dollar? Where’s your  Stafford Act money?” Obama shouts, angry now. “Makes no sense! Tells me that  somehow, the people down in New Orleans they don’t care about as much!”

It’s a remarkable moment, and not just for its resemblance to Kayne West’s  famous claim that “George Bush doesn’t care about black people,” but also  because of its basic dishonesty. By January of 2007, six months before Obama’s  Hampton speech, the federal government had sent at least $110 billion to areas  damaged by Katrina. Compare this to the mere $20 billion that the Bush  administration pledged to New York City after Sept. 11.

Moreover, the federal government did at times waive the Stafford Act during  its reconstruction efforts. On May 25, 2007, just weeks before the speech, the  Bush administration sent an additional $6.9 billion to Katrina-affected areas  with no strings attached.

As a sitting United States Senator, Obama must have been aware of this. And  yet he spent 36 minutes at the pulpit telling a mostly black audience that the  U.S. government doesn’t like them because they’re black.

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/obama-speech-jeremiah-wright-new-orleans/#ixzz28G6iGgZV

Entry #231

His Promises broken

 
   
 
Like This PageLiked · Yesterday
Since President Obama took office, your share of the debt has grown from $35,000 to roughly $51,000. That’s an increase of over $16,000 and a glaring reminder of the President’s broken promises
Entry #225

If the U.S. is to survive...!

Will An Obama Victory Spark A Civil War In The US?

September 29, 2012 

Obama Forward SC 690x1024 Will an Obama victory spark a civil war in the US?

America is on the verge of fragmentation and civil conflict because its citizens have lost control of their government and lost faith in its political institutions.

Nineteenth century political satirist Ambrose Bierce once described Washington D.C. as a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles and the conduct of public affairs for private advantage.

Indeed. Not much has changed one hundred years on.

The August 27, 2012  Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just eight percent (8%) of likely voters think that the US Congress is doing a good job.

Most Americans agree that the Democrat and Republican establishments are infested by individuals whose allegiance is not to their country, but to themselves and their political party. Their aim is to be unconstrained by the Constitution and the rule of law and unaccountable to the American people. Their conduct is driven by political expediency and winning elections for the sole purpose of obtaining power and profit.

The US has elections, but it no longer has representative government. The US has a free press, but one that is partisan and dishonest.

The Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists states:

Public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.

The reality of American journalism bears no resemblance to that official portrait.

Most Americans agree that the mainstream media represented by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and the liberal newspapers are little more than propaganda machines for the Democrat Party and are distorting the news in an attempt to manipulate public opinion to support the reelection of Barack Obama.

Few American institutions remain untouched by political corruption.

Through the blatant careerism of senior officers like the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, even the American military has been politicized to further the goals of the Obama Administration by submitting to the agenda of radical Islam, attempting to suppress free speech, and undermining public trust in the military by allowing active duty personnel in uniform to engage in partisan politics through their participation in a gay pride parade.

The real issue of the 2012 election is the endemic corruption in the federal government perpetrated by a permanent political class, financed by crony capitalism and facilitated by a fawning media (“It’s the corruption, stupid”).

They have brought us to the brink of bankruptcy, have opened our borders to illegal immigration, and have permitted a fifth column promoting Sharia law to infiltrate our society and judicial system.

Most Americans agree that there are anti-democratic and anti-American forces working aggressively inside the government and country to reduce American global influence and to promote the interests of global financiers and ideologies hostile to the United States.

The Obama Administration is expecting reelection and expecting trouble. It has ordered nearly one billion rounds of hollow point bullets. Hint – that type of ammunition is not meant for target practice. The 750 million rounds ordered by Obama’s Department of Homeland Security alone is enough ammunition for the government to fire three rounds into the body of every living American citizen.

When the truth is eventually told, the chronicles of the Obama years will represent the most sordid in American history and symbolize a pivot point when self-serving politicians collaborated with a compliant press to trigger the fall of the American republic.

If Obama wins, the American people should be prepared for economic collapse, a full assault on Constitutional rights, societal fragmentation, and civil strife.

There is a criminal in the White House, who is bent on a radical transformation of the country and must be removed from office if the United States is to survive.

But representative government will not return to America simply by defeating Barack Obama. It will only return when ordinary Americans feel empowered by their political institutions, not oppressed by them.

Entry #224

Two of a Kind - Dumb and dumber.

Obama Has To Draw An “inside Straight” To Win, But The Cards Just Aren’t There

September 27, 2012 

President Obama face WH photo SC Obama has to draw an “inside straight” to win, but the cards just aren’t there

The unskewed polls show Mitt Romney leading by 7.8 points and for good reason.

Barack Obama is not winning any group he lost in 2008, not doing better with any group he won, and not closing the gap with any group he lost.

Looking at his campaign, Barack Obama appears to need three cards for an inside straight to win reelection.

He has the two end “cards”, his Media Cheerleaders at one end and the power of incumbency at the other. Filling in the “cards” between them to gain a winning “hand” looks to be beyond Obama’s reach.

Here are the “cards” he needs to fill in his inside straight.

The female vote: he won this group by 13 points in 2008, and now the Battleground Poll (BP) tells us he is trailing with white women, who will make up at least 39% of the female vote by 9 points. A nine point lead among the first 39% makes getting to a 50/50 tie a tough job (and duplicating a final tally lead of 13 points almost impossible.) He’s not pulling this card.

The “Jewish” vote card was one that helped him in 2008. While they consist of only 2% of the vote, Jews who are a “canary in the coal mine” indicator gave him 78% of their vote. No Democrat has ever won the presidency while getting less than 68% of the Jewish vote. Obama is now at 59% with little chance of improving- not much chance of pulling this card.

The Hispanic vote card: In 2008, Obama got 67% of the Hispanic vote. BP reports Romney is getting 40% of the Hispanic vote, so this is another card he won’t pull.

The African-American card: he got 95% of this group.  Silly 94/0 media “poll” aside, there are no credible polls that show Obama doing anything like that; and for the first time ever, black ministers are telling their congregations not to vote at all. He is not pulling this card.

The young vote card: Obama got 66% of this vote in 2008, but the latest survey of young voters shows Obama getting just 61% of this group, so he’s not getting any help from this “card” either.

Entry #223
Page 132 of 147
Guest