Unequal fact of life: Men are more likely to be killed on the job :-(

Published:

Equal Death Day’: May 3, 2030

Another unequal fact of life: Men are more likely to be killed on the job.

By The Editorial Board

April 8, 2019 6:36 p.m. ET

 

Activists, community leaders, union members and politicians gather on the steps of City Hall in New York to rally against pay disparity 

 

Last Tuesday was “Equal Pay Day.” This unofficial holiday was first declared in 1996 to protest the “wage gap” between the sexes. In the latest data, according to proponents, American women who work full time earned only 80 cents for each $1 earned by men. Hence, to catch up with a man’s pay from 2018, a woman must keep working until roughly April 2.

 

The problem with comparing this raw, aggregate data is well documented. Women on average go into lower-paying fields, such as education. Mothers are likelier than fathers to choose flexibility over career advancement. Men tend to work slightly more hours on the job.

 

 

A Conservative Upset in Wisconsin

A conservative upset in Wisconsin and Pete Buttigieg's rise.

 

 

The “wage gap” crowd says these factors can’t account for the entirety of the difference. But even assuming they’re correct, then would they please stop citing the tendentious 80 cents figure? Resetting “Equal Pay Day” to fall on, say, Jan. 25 would be less dramatic, but much less dishonest.

 

And what about other ways the labor market is unequal? To illustrate one example, Mark Perry, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute, has suggested “Equal Occupational Fatality Day.” The basic point is that, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, men in America are much more likely to be killed while working.

 

Fishery workers had the highest rate of fatal on-the-job injury in 2017: nearly 100 per 100,000 people. The industry is so small that the BLS doesn’t provide detailed data, but presumably most commercial fishermen were men. The second-most dangerous job was held by lumberjacks (and a few lumberjills, but 98% were male). Next were aircraft pilots (94% male), roofers (99%), garbagemen (88%), and so forth.

 

After running the numbers, Mr. Perry wrote last week: “The next ‘Equal Occupational Fatality Day’ will occur more than 11 years from now—on May 3, 2030. That date symbolizes how far into the future women will be able to continue working before they experience the same loss of life that men experienced in 2018 from work-related deaths.”

 

This increased risk no doubt shows up in men’s paychecks. Not all dangerous occupations, obviously, will get you rich. Logging workers average $42,340 a year. Still, that’s more than preschool and kindergarten teachers ($40,070), who are 98% female.

 

The broader point is that humanity is complicated. Millions of men and women make their own choices about which careers, jobs and family structures will work best for them. Who but a committed social engineer could demand that their median pay precisely match!

Entry #935

Comments

Avatar Think -
#1
Take it from someone who worked in manufacturing plants that were (or have since) all closed because it was cheaper to make stuff in Mexico and China that if women really do make less than men for the same work then in short time no man would have a job. If companies can get the same job done for cheaper they will do so quickly. If there really is a pay gap then why do so many men have jobs today?
Avatar eddessaknight -
#2
Thanks Think-

For some lighthearted fun :-)

A humorous take, on why women outlive men, by funny man Alan King from Brooklyn:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x35qbvc
Avatar mikeintexas -
#3
I never saw too many women on drilling rigs; many tool pushers held the same old superstitions about them being aboard ships. I DID work on a rig that had an entire crew of women on the evening shift, pretty rough women and the driller (the crew's boss) looked like she could hold her own against any man. Other than a few geologists or mud engineers, you just didn't find many women in the industry.

I'm surprised there aren't more women pilots, though; they really do well flying high performance fighter jets as well as the big passenger planes.   With the military aircraft, they have smaller frames and can withstand G-forces well, plus they usually are more detail-oriented and not prone to take chances. Maybe that last is what keeps them from more of them being fighter pilots, maybe a genetic predisposition that doesn't lend itself to aggression.

Back when my mom worked, she was the highest paid female in her company, executive positions not included.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register