He claims that nothing can travel faster than light. Thanx to the innovation of the computer age, relentless efforts on my part to always find  another explanation, was eventually rewarded to me.

If the sun suddenly blew up, would the gravitational hold on our planet take about 8 and a half minutes to disappear, before we hurdle thru space in a straight line? I say not.....!

 It takes light about 8 and a half minutes to reach the earth's surface.

So there is something that travels faster than light. I say just about instantaneously, don't you think, considering it has to travel 93 million miles?

HMMMMM!

How about gravitational holds of much much  larger stars than ours? Quasars for example. They can hold as much as millions of our suns inside them. They are huge... Can you imagine the grip of some Quasars thousands or more times farther out? Imagine the time it would take "light" to travel. Maybe days to get to, but with gravity, it is almost right away.

Some people argue that gravity has no physical substance like photons or waves in light, and that there's no comparison. I say to them that gravity is a source of energy, like light. There IS a commonality. But the difference between them that makes gravity a winner in the battle, is that gravity does not diminish in strength, as quickly as all other kinds of energy.

In just about every other source of energy requires energy to make it run. Think about it. If you run out of gas in your car, you must replenish it with more. If your battery dies, either you can buy rechargeable batteries, or buy more disposable ones. In either case, you have to replenish the machine. With gravity, there is no replenishing. It just seems to have a never ending supply of energy.

Most everyone including the top scientists from past to future think they can explain what gravity is made up of. But that's an illusion. They mostly talk about the effects and not the source.They might involve fancy words describing the large metal deposits at the poles, as an explanation. That's fine to do so, but then again, they're only speaking about large magnets on either poles. It seems that you don't necessarily have to have a lot of metal to have gravity. All you need is to be as big as you can possibly get, and have as much mass along with it. Since all objects in the universe are attracted to each other, it only seems logical that the bigger the object the more the gravity. Jupiter is a prime example. Remember Shoemaker Levy nine? 

The above paragraph is very important to remember. The best part is that gravity has no parts that can wear out. Since there is no such thing as perpetual motion, gravity is a close second. 

Just thought you'd know....LOL