- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 7:30 am
You last visited
March 29, 2024, 7:30 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Systems
Published:
I like the idea of developing a system to help me win a jackpot. The knowledge that such a system is impossible can not deter me. I am one of those people who know that what I feel is more correct than what I know. Having said that, let us begin.
Which game to play; that is the question. Pick 3 has odds of 1 to 1000. Pick 4 has odds of 1 to 10,000. Pick 5 has odds of 1 to 575,757. Powerball/Mega Millions has odds of 1 to impossible.
Putting odds aside for the moment, let's look at the jackpots. In P3, I could win $500 if I were to pick the 3 correct numbers. P4 would give me $5000. So what are my chances of picking the correct number sequence? My chances are zero; your chances might be different. I know my life and my life experiences tell me that I will never pick the right combination without a whole lot of help ( or luck). Knowing this I have decided to go for the big money; I wll go for the P5 game. Then when I do hit, there will be a jackpot worth having.
Right from the get-go, I have to make a decision. Do I want to reduce the "playing field" to, say, 7 numbers ( or 10, or 20, or 25 numbers)? This seems to be the right path to follow and so I took; the road less traveled as far as I was concerned.
Back in 1995, this is the way I went. I spent three years trying to reduce the playing field to no avail. No matter what I did there never occurred the first instance of a reduced playing field possessing the five winning numbers. I substracted three; added two; multiplied by Pi. I took the first three numbers, summed them, the divided that sum by the sum of the last two numbers. This gave me a ratio. I programmed my computer to find all the combination that produced the ratio I thought would appear in the next draw. Forty reams of paper later, I realized there was no way to predict with any degree of certainty the future ratio. So I went back to the drawing board.
I learned a lot from those three years. I learned there is no mathmatical way to determine what the next draw will bring. I learned the true meaning of the word "random". I learned that only fools think they can develop a system to win the lottory. Being such a fool, I continued on.
Comments
"I learned there is no mathmatical way to determine what the next draw will bring."
I have proved the first assumption is incorrect, but I absolutely agree with you on your second assumption.
Because of an anomaly in all lottery pool systems, whether it be ball drawn or computer generated, there is a way to reduce the playing field drastically with a high degree of consistancy and accuracy.
After proving this for a period of time right here on LP, I determination to discontinue my freely given efforts due to disbelief and absence of interest.
Why the amount of disbelief and absence of interest? Only one out of a thousand here have enough intestinal fortitude to seriously delve into a process that has proven succesful.
Perplexing, isn't it?
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register