I don't know where to post this at, so I am posting it on my blog.
I don't know anything about Math, not the first nor the last (Thing).
So therefore I might be wrong about somethings that I (Say) write about.
"They" say that the winning number(s) is (Are) brought about by (A series) of "Random" events.
So then if that is true (I don't know), I would think that whatever (Factors) lead(s) to "The winning number(s)" can't be found out.
If all the digits and numbers have the same chance of getting to be the winning numbers, then those that get to be winning numbers, did not have no particular past statistics that set them appart from non winning numbers, that is that winning numbers to be, can't be found out (Predicted) by their past statistics, that is by the past statistics of their patterns.
If that is so, then predicted numbers would be no better than random numbers.
It might be illogical, but I still think that the main problem with prediction is not the so called random, but that the state wants to make lottery money and they are the ones who hold the drawings, so it would be to their best interest to make as much money as possible from the sale of lottery tickets.
Trying to rate the "Winning Probability" of patterns is very hard or impossible to do for somebody with little to no knowledge of Math.
So one question might be: How do you rate the winning probability of patterns?
Is there any such thing as "Winning Probability" of patterns, Is that something possible to do with Math, or with whatever?
What are the "Winning Statistics" of particular patterns (If any), versus the "Non-Winning Statistics"?
Can the study of the past winning numbers help in increasing the chances of winning, or not?
There were and are prediction softwares that were and are so close, the people who made them knew and know so much (I guess), too bad that they didn't and know just a little bit more.
Softwares make prediction so much easier or less hard.
Too bad that Simulotto and MaxHitPro are no more.