Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 3:19 am
You last visited November 30, 2020, 2:03 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Universal National Service Act H.R.5741.IH


Last Edited: July 27, 2010, 1:58 pm

Put url in your address bar [if you are not already aware to do so]



July 15, 2010


H. R. 5741
To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.

Entry #1,304


JAP69Comment by JAP69 - July 27, 2010, 2:13 pm
They come up with something new every day. Gotta watch em like a hawk. Seems like the populace would be notified of this for their input. How many would know of this until it has been passed?
Why do we need permanent federal and state employees with their pay and benefits. They could assign the incomong two year national service people to perform the duties. Have a steady influx of employees with no problem.
Rick GComment by Rick G - July 27, 2010, 4:18 pm
It's illegal conscription. You can tell by the wording that it's a back-door draft. Meanwhile the corrupt Charles Rengel is calling loudly for a draft. That is to distract us into thinking this bill is NOT a draft.

What they are creating is a Gestapo through the auspices of "Homeland" Security. That's exactly what Hitler did in Germany.

Judging by the anger in America today, it would not be a wise idea for them to pass this. It might be the proverbial straw.
sully16Comment by sully16 - July 27, 2010, 8:26 pm
They can kiss my ass.
JAP69Comment by JAP69 - July 27, 2010, 9:06 pm
Thanks Rick & Sully
I agree with both of you.
Have you heard? Mass legislature has passed a bill waiting for the governors signature. Mass wants to do away with the electoral college. Winner of the national population vote takes all electorial votes in Mass no matter how Mass voters voted. Cute huh. The article said other states are considerng the bill.
Hows that hope and change going?
Rick GComment by Rick G - July 28, 2010, 8:43 am
I like Sully's comment. Pretty much the first words that came to my mind when I read the article.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.