The following is an ecerpt from the article.

"The irony is that mass die-offs – usually of animals with large populations – are getting the attention while a larger but slower mass extinction of thousands of species because of human activity is ignored, Wilson said."

I'm sure the examples given in the article pertain to animals that die off slowly, not instantaneously. There seems to be a justification going on for all of this. In the article it states that mass die-offs happen all the time, but it's mostly not noticed. Well, then why is the case in arkansas such a big deal then?

Could be a slow news day.

I'd like to see the report that the article states which supposedly shows that this happens all the time. And, I would be very interested to see whether the cases in the past that "happen all the time", were also instant mass deaths.

Maybe someone is reading Pumpis' blog and getting ideas for depopulation!

ha haaaa...right...lol

You can probably thank the elite. Humans are next.

helping to push an agenda?????

That's right Sully. Yeah....Everything is alright.....NO worries whatsover....lol

Just hope Yellowstone doesn't pop its top, it could be us...........in the flash of a mega explosion followed by a mega pyroclastic flow 200 miles wide 600 miles long. It would be like 50 Krakatowas at once!!!!!!!!! Volcanic winter for 20+ years..................Fun stuff!!!!! A pension and healthcare won't help.HA!