Is this the change?

Published:

Income Redistribution: Federal Spending Up, and So Is Poverty

We finally found an instance in which Obama administration numbers add up. Unfortunately, we mean it literally -- they really add UP. In 2009 -- or, as we call it, the Early Dark Ages -- newly elected Barack Obama claimed that his $800 billion stimulus would reduce the number of Americans living in poverty by two million. Specifically, he promised his plan would "help poor and working Americans pull themselves into the middle class in a way we haven't seen in nearly 50 years." Besides being dead wrong on that account, in the first two years of Obama's presidency, the number of Americans living in poverty rose by 2.6 million. According to the Census Bureau in 2009, 43.6 million Americans were living below the poverty line. Jump ahead to 2011 and the number climbs to 46.2 million.

And that's not all. During the same period, the number of Americans on food stamps rose from 31.9 million to more than 47.6 million, which, as CNS News points out, represents a 49.3 percent increase and brings the number of food-stamp recipients in the U.S. to more than the entire population of Spain.

In many cases, numbers "adding up" is a good thing, but when they add up to nearly 50 million Americans living in poverty under this administration, there's nothing good about that.

Entry #363

Comments

Avatar Coin Toss -
#1
Mayve I should lock this one before some obama supporter blames it on Bush.
Avatar emilyg -
#2
It's change - not good but change. He has us going to hell.
Avatar CajunWin4 -
#3
Welcome to Barry's Nation of its not my fault ... It time people stop depending on the Goverment and become self sufficient and reliant . Barry sheep will be having some very hard times in the Near Future ! No more Freebies ...
Avatar sully16 -
#4
Be prepared
Avatar rdgrnr -
#5
Poverty levels aren't considered important standards of success unless a Republican is in office.
If a Republican is in office and they're high it's a crisis and all hell breaks loose with the media.
If a Democrat's in office, the media couldn't care less.
In fact, they'll bury any mention of it.
Avatar Think -
#6
Oooh this person isn't taking care of themselves...lets get the money from this other person who IS taking care of themselves...oh...now we have two people who cant take care of themselves...where can we tax more from to take care of person number 2...hmmm
Avatar GASMETERGUY -
#7
Good thinking, Think. You have summarized the situation very well.
Avatar MADDOG10 -
#8
Well, he got what he wanted. All his sheeple under his wing, but wait until the mountain stats to crumble. Ooops NO More Freebies... I wonder what they'll be humming then...!!!

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register