USA Mega

Lottery Places

The time is now 9:48 pm

You last visited
May 10, 2024, 6:25 pm

All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Home › Blogs › JAP69's Blog › POINTS OF LAW Which support and in turn are supported by the Constitution of the United States of Am

POINTS OF LAW Which support and in turn are supported by the Constitution of the United States of Am

Published:

___________________________________________

POINTS OF LAW
Which support and in turn are supported
by the Constitution of the United States of America
http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/ptsoflaw.pdf

excerpt:
1. "Where the meaning of the Constitution is clear and unambiguous, there can be no resort to
construction to attribute to the founders a purpose or intent not manifest in its letter." Norris v.
Baltimore, 172, MD 667; 192 A 531.0

3. "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v. Madison, 5
US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

_____________________________________

Comment by jap69

Is the second ammendment clear in its meaning?

Are these gun control laws repugnant to the constitution?

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Entry #2,542

Comments

Avatar JAP69 -
#1
Someone likes to write or have laws written but is one who cares not to follow the law.
These intended new laws must be challenged before they become law. Once an intended new law becomes law it can take years for a challenge to the new law to work up thru the courts. And legislators know this.
A direct route is to have the legislator challenged for failure to uphold their oath of office.
Avatar MADDOG10 -
#2
Hey, that's opies dialogue isn't it?..
Avatar rdgrnr -
#3
When I saw Obama on tv during the campaign saying "I don't want your guns" I knew one thing for sure - he wanted our guns.
And whether he uses convoluted interpretation or manipulation of the Constitution or tries to make us subject to a UN mandate, one thing is for sure - he's gonna do everything in his power to take our guns.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#4
And also, I think he's gonna keep trying to buy up all the ammo so we can't get any until he gets new laws in place restricting it.
Avatar GASMETERGUY -
#5
Any new law which gets challenged in court should have an injunction issued forbidding implementing that law until the courts have ruled. This was the modus operandi at one time.

Today, with our liberal judges, new laws are allowed to be implemented even tho that law might be overturned in court.

This is the problem. The solution is to find judges that uphold the law and not their political agendas.
Avatar JAP69 -
#6
Comment by GASMETERGUY - Today, 8:05 pm
Any new law which gets challenged in court should have an injunction issued forbidding implementing that law until the courts have ruled. This was the modus operandi at one time.
___________________________________________
Yep,
That is what the feds still do to the states with judges in their back pocket.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register

Guest