Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited May 22, 2022, 12:05 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Court: Ex-Husband Can Share Lottery Jackpot

Mar 22, 2005, 8:09 am

Share this news story on Facebook
Tweet this news story on Twitter
Connecticut LotteryConnecticut Lottery: Court: Ex-Husband Can Share Lottery Jackpot

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Monday that the ex-husband of a $7 million lottery winner deserves to share her fortune.

The high court's 5-0 ruling upheld a lower court order that Pamela Noyes-Dombrowski pay Eugene M. Dombrowski alimony after the dissolution of their nearly 14-year marriage.

In 1992, after years of spending a few dollars each week playing the lottery, despite opposition from her husband, Noyes-Dombrowski hit the jackpot for $7 million. She opted to receive the winnings in annual installments of about $384,680 over a twenty year period.

During their divorce in 2003, a judge awarded Eugene Dombrowski half of his ex-wife's future lottery payments, minus his salary, as alimony.

The high court found the judge in the divorce case was within his discretion in determining that the lottery winnings could be considered salary.

Noyes-Dombroski challenged the award, based it part on comments by the judge who said "if this were a situation where the husband had the money ... there would be absolutely no argument that the wife would get a share of the windfall."

Justice Flemming L. Norcott Jr., who wrote the opinion, said while trial judge's comment might have been imprudent, there is no evidence that it influenced the court's division of the proceeds.


We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 17 years ago by CASH Only.
Page 1 of 1
ineed9million's avatar - scene sunovermountains.jpg
Philadelphia, PA
United States
Member #11436
February 13, 2005
176 Posts

It could have been alot worse for this lady...she won in 1992....13 years ago...So she's already recevied about most of the jackpot already.  Since she only has 7 years left remaining she's only going to have to part with about 1 million.  If this story had been the other way around we would see the judge ordering the man to pay 1/2 of what he already receieved....not have of what he has yet to receive.

    United States
    Member #379
    June 5, 2002
    11296 Posts

    CT Lotto did not have a cash option in 1992, despite what the article suggests.