Arkansas lottery retailers to be policed for fraud, officials say

May 19, 2009, 8:32 am (7 comments)

Arkansas Lottery

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The legislation laying the groundwork for Arkansas' lottery does not require it, but officials say they expect the lottery system to include a security division that will be on the lookout for fraud by retailers.

The problem of fraud by lottery retailers gained new attention in the U.S. in the wake of a 2007 scandal in Canada, where investigators found that retailers and their employees were winning a disproportionately large number of prizes.

Between 1999 and 2006, at least 78 retail owners and 131 retail employees in Canada won major lottery prizes, according to the report "A Game of Trust" by Ontario Ombudsman Andre Marin.

Dateline NBC reported recently that insider wins are common in the U.S. as well. According to the report, individual retailers in California, New Jersey and New York have cashed in hundreds of tickets apiece for winnings ranging from $160,000 to $500,000. In Illinois, four employees at one store and five of their relatives cashed 556 tickets for more than $1.6 million.

Wins by retailers can be legitimate, but Dateline reported that lottery investigators conducting a recent sting in California found that fraud was common.

The investigators presented tickets with winning numbers at about 500 stores. At 59 of the stores, owners or clerks kept the tickets and later tried to collect prize money for themselves. Typically, the owners and clerks falsely told the investigators they did not have winning tickets.

In Minnesota, the security office of that state's lottery announced in March that its investigators had presented tickets with winning numbers at 186 stores. Clerks at five of the stores kept the tickets and later tried to collect prizes for themselves, officials said.

House Speaker Robbie Wills, D-Conway, who sponsored enabling legislation for the state-run lottery that Arkansas voters approved in November, said he is confident the Arkansas Lottery Commission will create a security division to keep retailers honest.

"They've got a number of positions available to them ... and if they follow the model of other states, they'll have people on staff whose job it is to investigate," Wills said.

"It would basically be the security arm of the lottery," Wills continued. "We've had some other states that have recommended that, that we have people who basically function like Alcoholic Beverage Control agents function for that agency, to make sure that the retailers are following the rules and not selling to people under 18, for instance."

The Lottery Commission's chairman, Ray Thornton, said he expects the commission to hire enforcement officers. The commission is authorized to hire up to 75 people in addition to the 13 positions specified in Act 606 of 2009, the legislation that created the commission.

Act 606 also authorizes the commission to conduct background checks of retailers and inspect their facilities "at times determined solely by the commission."

"We think that honesty and integrity is vital in this, and we're going to do everything possible to make sure that the public is treated with dignity and honesty," Thornton said. "We'll have enforcement people, we'll be reviewing the actions of our licensees and our vendors, and we will have the ability to discipline anyone who does not live up to those values."

Lawmakers have said they expect the first lottery tickets to be sold by the end of the year. Thornton has said he expects tickets to be available at about 2,000 retail outlets in the state.

One question for officials to consider is whether anti-fraud efforts should be proactive or reactive. Iowa Ombudsman William Angrick released a report last month that criticized the Iowa lottery's enforcement arm for what he deemed a failure to detect fraud independently from customers' complaints, making it difficult to know how much fraud is occurring.

"Unfortunately, when we sought to learn what was being done to prevent and police theft by lottery retailers, the answer we arrived at was, 'Not much,'" Angrick wrote.

Lottery officials say enforcement is important, but it is also important for players to protect themselves from being defrauded.

"The top thing that we encourage our players to do is sign the back of their tickets," said Kimberly Chopin, spokeswoman for the Louisiana Lottery. "If someone comes in to claim a prize that's above $600, if that signature line is altered in any way, we're going to conduct an immediate investigation."

Players also should also get a receipt when collecting prize money and should not leave tickets with retailers, Chopin said.

"There is no reason why a retailer needs to keep a non-winning ticket," she said.

Chopin said the Louisiana Lottery has two enforcement officers to police the state's 2,600 retailers who sell lottery tickets. The officers do not perform stings like those in California and Minnesota, she said.

Susan Goedde, spokeswoman for the Missouri Lottery, said one of the most important things players can do is learn how to check tickets on their own.

"We offer ticket 'check-it' machines at retail locations, where you could put the ticket in and check it," she said. "We also have (winning) numbers on our Web site."

When a retailer does check a ticket for a customer, the prize amount appears on a screen that the customer can see, Goedde said.

Goedde said the Missouri Lottery has two enforcement officers to police the state's nearly 5,000 lottery retailers. The officers do not perform stings, she said.

One possible way to cut down on fraud would be to ban licensed retailers from playing the lottery. Ontario's ombudsman has said he is considering recommending such a ban in Canada.

But lottery officials say banning retailers from playing would have drawbacks.

"There are a lot of retailers who play, and it would probably affect our sales," Goedde said.

Arkansas News Bureau

Comments

ricky p

I think that all retailers have a right to win lottery prizes as any lotto player do. There could not be any possible fraud. If they spend their money to nbuy the ticket, they should have a chance of winning as well. Of the retailer have the chance to buy the very first ticket, but it wouldn't make a difference. Lottery are a game of luck. Just because someone is being lucky doesn't mean that they are doing something wrong. The retaoillers are just lucky.

MaddMike51

Quote: Originally posted by ricky p on May 19, 2009

I think that all retailers have a right to win lottery prizes as any lotto player do. There could not be any possible fraud. If they spend their money to nbuy the ticket, they should have a chance of winning as well. Of the retailer have the chance to buy the very first ticket, but it wouldn't make a difference. Lottery are a game of luck. Just because someone is being lucky doesn't mean that they are doing something wrong. The retaoillers are just lucky.

While the majority of retailers are most likely honest,some have been proven guilty of fraud and some have been proven guilty of theft.Should retailers be allowed to play the lottery?Yes,but not at stores that they own or work at.Its to easy to cheat customers out of their winnings if you have larceny in your heart.

konane's avatarkonane

Quote: Originally posted by MaddMike51 on May 19, 2009

While the majority of retailers are most likely honest,some have been proven guilty of fraud and some have been proven guilty of theft.Should retailers be allowed to play the lottery?Yes,but not at stores that they own or work at.Its to easy to cheat customers out of their winnings if you have larceny in your heart.

I Agree!  Scratchers especially.  Anyone playing the lottery needs to be proactive checking their own tickets for themselves.  Think you might have a winner for any numbers game, then ask for a payout for that specific day, check it yourself .... then sign the back of the ticket before presenting it to any clerk.

Littleoldlady's avatarLittleoldlady

If they (the retailers) are so darn "Lucky", let them play at someone else's store.  I don't think they should be allowed to play at their own store.  Then they can come back and do another check on how "lucky" the retailers are. I bet they won't be so "Lucky".

SpanaUnlimited

How about getting contact info from the lottery players at the time of purchase.

Right now lottery players don't have to show ID and don't have to sign anything unless they are actually claiming a prize.   

By having the contact info on the system beforehand.....should someone actually have a winning ticket.....the lottery officials can verify that the ticket wasn't stolen or otained via fraudulent purposes

wizeguy's avatarwizeguy

Quote: Originally posted by SpanaUnlimited on May 19, 2009

How about getting contact info from the lottery players at the time of purchase.

Right now lottery players don't have to show ID and don't have to sign anything unless they are actually claiming a prize.   

By having the contact info on the system beforehand.....should someone actually have a winning ticket.....the lottery officials can verify that the ticket wasn't stolen or otained via fraudulent purposes

Bad idea! I try to stay in as few databases as possible. It would also slow down lines considerably. And what about a friend asking you to buy a ticket for them while you were getting yours? If he had a winner I could say it was my ticket and have proof of purchase.

SpanaUnlimited

Quote: Originally posted by wizeguy on May 19, 2009

Bad idea! I try to stay in as few databases as possible. It would also slow down lines considerably. And what about a friend asking you to buy a ticket for them while you were getting yours? If he had a winner I could say it was my ticket and have proof of purchase.

Perhaps you are right.   It would be time consuming and I don't think retailers would be very happy spending so much time for a customer buying a #1 ticket.

But without doing something proactive....it is very diffiucult to detect fraud.   Pretty much the only way a criminal could get caught is if a undercover agent "tests" the retailer to see if they confirm the correct winnings.

Right now all they have to do is find a winning ticket and if the ticket is unsigned.....it can be redeemed by anyone.    Since the ticket has no info on the actual purchaser.....there is no way to prove that the claimant has the right to claim the ticket.   The claimant can simply lie and say he found the ticket on the floor outside.   The claimant can say anything really. 

Current lottery rules simply only request signature in the back of the ticket and for the claimant to be over 18yrs old.    Lottery officials will check the ticket to make sure it is legit and not forged/counterfeit.   They will get your IRS info.    After that......the paycheck is yours.

End of comments
Subscribe to this news story