Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited May 16, 2022, 8:03 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Ex-wife gets millions from lottery winner 10 years after leaving him

Topic closed. 89 replies. Last post 11 years ago by socalgal.

Page 2 of 6
PrintE-mailLink
danyo1332's avatar - 6f3ea6111054bd23670f4546b8aff1a8
Akron, ohio
United States
Member #94562
July 22, 2010
2582 Posts
Offline

What goes around comes around! She will get hit hard watch!

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/325223/5825074 Triple Top Tips

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/330673 Tracking Triples/False Triples In Real Time

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/325603/5847177 More From Pick Four (HOT Pick 3 pair system)

    rdgrnr's avatar - nw barkeep.jpg
    100
    Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler
    The Hall Of The Mountain Kings Tennessee
    United States
    Member #73902
    April 28, 2009
    15285 Posts
    Offline

    You tell'em ridge you've been dumped 5 times and haven't paid a dime..Maybe this dude should have hired your lawyer or lawyers?...

    Lawyers don't mean anything when you've got a liberal judge who thinks it's his job to punish the evil rich and make everything "fair."

    It's like Bam-Bam told Joe the Plumber: "We gotta spread the wealth around."

      rdgrnr's avatar - nw barkeep.jpg
      100
      Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler
      The Hall Of The Mountain Kings Tennessee
      United States
      Member #73902
      April 28, 2009
      15285 Posts
      Offline

      What goes around comes around! She will get hit hard watch!

      You're right danyo, I've seen terribly tragic things happen to people who've done things like that.

      I don't wish that on her but she won't escape the rebound from that anymore than she'll escape gravity.

      It's natural  balance.

        temptustoo's avatar - cat anm.gif
        usa
        United States
        Member #89194
        April 2, 2010
        2826 Posts
        Offline

        What an unmitigated outrage. How does this miserable, greedy witch have a right to somebody's money that she was divorced from 10 years prior after leaving him for another man? This is absolutely, unbelievably outrageous.

        They must have liberals in the court system over there, that's all I can figure.

        You can cut the karma with a knife around this one though.

        Nigel will have good karma for offering the trifling trollop over a million and a half as a gift, free money, no strings attached.

        Wendy will have bad karma for being greedy and taking what didn't belong to her and what she had no right to. That money is going to bring her grief sooner or later.

        I've seen it too many times.

        Im not surprised by the courts decision.. Justice just isn't anymore it seems...

          RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
          100
          mid-Ohio
          United States
          Member #9
          March 24, 2001
          20272 Posts
          Offline

          I wonder if he can appeal the decision in a higher court or would he consider that too time consuming and a waste of time and more money. 

          I remember a case in Alabama in which a waitress was given a winning Florida lottery ticket worth $10M by a customer who thought she would share any winnings with her fellow employees but she didn't and so when a local court decided she should she appealed that decision in the state supreme court and it was overturned.

           * you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones * 

          Thumbs Up       


            United States
            Member #68711
            December 28, 2008
            301 Posts
            Offline

            They should live the same lifestyle as him? She deserves this money?

            Why is that exactly? Shouldn't her new husband be keeping her in her preferred lifestyle?

            Why would it be the job of the man she left ten years ago to provide her with a millionaire's lifestyle now, praytell?

            He's always provided well for his child and will do even more now.

            What the hell has the old hag ex-wife got to do with it?

            Are you hittin the sauce again Louise?

            No NoNow! rdgrnnr there are three side to every story, his side ,her side and the right side. The judge was very generous to him, because she could have gotten much more with the right lawyerThumbs UpYes Nod How you know she didn't leave him after he cheated.Again she deserve the money to raise their daughter. No,I on nothing but think she need this money.Big Grin Angel

              Winning K's avatar - Lottery-018.jpg
              IL.
              United States
              Member #10029
              December 31, 2004
              47 Posts
              Offline

              Strange no one is saying anything about this part of the story, " Page gave his old $380,000 home and car to his cleaner.Dunk

              Winning K.

                Lotterologist's avatar - lightbulb
                Lotto City, Michigan
                United States
                Member #36255
                March 30, 2006
                1491 Posts
                Offline

                England sucks!

                "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future."----Niels Bohr

                  ttech10's avatar - blobdude
                  Texas
                  United States
                  Member #92326
                  June 5, 2010
                  887 Posts
                  Offline

                  Strange no one is saying anything about this part of the story, " Page gave his old $380,000 home and car to his cleaner.Dunk

                  Yea that was pretty generous. I imagine when you're moving into a ~$11 million home that $380,000 wouldn't matter too much.

                   

                  This story made me think of one of the Lottery Changed My Life shows. This guy in Florida won a few months after his wife left him and after taking him to court she still lost and didn't receive anything. I imagine one of the differences here is that there is a child involved. I guess if she goes ahead and spends it carelessly on herself and not the child he could go to court and fight for custody of her since the mom not using the money to care for the child wouldn't look very good for her.

                   

                  Still congrats to the guy for winning, at least it's not as bad as if it happened in the US where out of that $90 million there would only be about half of it left after taxes alone.

                    time*treat's avatar - radar

                    United States
                    Member #13130
                    March 30, 2005
                    2171 Posts
                    Offline

                    Gotta remember this is the same UK that regularly puts people in prison for defending their own homes and families with "excessive force".

                    In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
                    Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

                      NITEHAWK61's avatar - wings2
                      WESTCHESTER/NEW YORK
                      United States
                      Member #25040
                      October 31, 2005
                      106 Posts
                      Offline

                      What an unmitigated outrage. How does this miserable, greedy witch have a right to somebody's money that she was divorced from 10 years prior after leaving him for another man? This is absolutely, unbelievably outrageous.

                      They must have liberals in the court system over there, that's all I can figure.

                      You can cut the karma with a knife around this one though.

                      Nigel will have good karma for offering the trifling trollop over a million and a half as a gift, free money, no strings attached.

                      Wendy will have bad karma for being greedy and taking what didn't belong to her and what she had no right to. That money is going to bring her grief sooner or later.

                      I've seen it too many times.

                      I agree rdgrnr!!!!

                      there is something wrong with this picture!!!!

                      .

                        rdgrnr's avatar - nw barkeep.jpg
                        100
                        Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler
                        The Hall Of The Mountain Kings Tennessee
                        United States
                        Member #73902
                        April 28, 2009
                        15285 Posts
                        Offline

                        No NoNow! rdgrnnr there are three side to every story, his side ,her side and the right side. The judge was very generous to him, because she could have gotten much more with the right lawyerThumbs UpYes Nod How you know she didn't leave him after he cheated.Again she deserve the money to raise their daughter. No,I on nothing but think she need this money.Big Grin Angel

                        You're coming unwound Miss Louise.

                        The judge was very generous to him? Louise listen, the judge confiscated a ton of his money and gave it to somebody else who just happened to want it. How is that being generous to him?  She had absolutely no right to any of that money and the judge had absolutely no right to take it away from him and give it to her.

                        She may have had a right to ask for more child support in light of his new financial status but why in blue blazes would she be entitled to a nickel of his money? He offered to put it in trust for the child but NO!  she wanted it all for herself! And the slimy, liberal weasel of a judge gave it to her!

                         

                        "No,I on nothing but think she need this money."

                        You think she needs this money? So a judge should give her somebody else's money because she needs it? A LOT of people need that money! Should we all get a slick lawyer and sue him for it? We have as much right to it as she does!

                         

                        Whether she left him because of cheating (your conjecture) or any other reason has absolutely no bearing on his lottery win. This case was settled in court 10 years ago!

                        I cannot believe this will be allowed to stand!

                         

                        I think I smell a little Pinot Grigio in here, Miss Louise.   Yes Nod  Cheers No No

                          NITEHAWK61's avatar - wings2
                          WESTCHESTER/NEW YORK
                          United States
                          Member #25040
                          October 31, 2005
                          106 Posts
                          Offline

                          You're coming unwound Miss Louise.

                          The judge was very generous to him? Louise listen, the judge confiscated a ton of his money and gave it to somebody else who just happened to want it. How is that being generous to him?  She had absolutely no right to any of that money and the judge had absolutely no right to take it away from him and give it to her.

                          She may have had a right to ask for more child support in light of his new financial status but why in blue blazes would she be entitled to a nickel of his money? He offered to put it in trust for the child but NO!  she wanted it all for herself! And the slimy, liberal weasel of a judge gave it to her!

                           

                          "No,I on nothing but think she need this money."

                          You think she needs this money? So a judge should give her somebody else's money because she needs it? A LOT of people need that money! Should we all get a slick lawyer and sue him for it? We have as much right to it as she does!

                           

                          Whether she left him because of cheating (your conjecture) or any other reason has absolutely no bearing on his lottery win. This case was settled in court 10 years ago!

                          I cannot believe this will be allowed to stand!

                           

                          I think I smell a little Pinot Grigio in here, Miss Louise.   Yes Nod  Cheers No No

                          Exactly correct!!! This case was settled 10 years ago!!! If it was the right thing to do everyone would be doing it and there would be a free-for-all!! If the judge was to do the right thing it would be to put the money in trust for HIS daughter!!!

                          .

                            Grovel's avatar - f800e6a39fbfea795d1dcbb09f2244
                            Little Rock, AR
                            United States
                            Member #68363
                            December 19, 2008
                            254 Posts
                            Offline

                            And this is why you don't get married people. You can work all your life for your money and someone can walk away with half in just a minute.

                              DEE88's avatar - animal doggy2.jpg
                              50
                              PA
                              United States
                              Member #69847
                              January 18, 2009
                              22304 Posts
                              Offline

                              You're coming unwound Miss Louise.

                              The judge was very generous to him? Louise listen, the judge confiscated a ton of his money and gave it to somebody else who just happened to want it. How is that being generous to him?  She had absolutely no right to any of that money and the judge had absolutely no right to take it away from him and give it to her.

                              She may have had a right to ask for more child support in light of his new financial status but why in blue blazes would she be entitled to a nickel of his money? He offered to put it in trust for the child but NO!  she wanted it all for herself! And the slimy, liberal weasel of a judge gave it to her!

                               

                              "No,I on nothing but think she need this money."

                              You think she needs this money? So a judge should give her somebody else's money because she needs it? A LOT of people need that money! Should we all get a slick lawyer and sue him for it? We have as much right to it as she does!

                               

                              Whether she left him because of cheating (your conjecture) or any other reason has absolutely no bearing on his lottery win. This case was settled in court 10 years ago!

                              I cannot believe this will be allowed to stand!

                               

                              I think I smell a little Pinot Grigio in here, Miss Louise.   Yes Nod  Cheers No No

                                  Right on rdgrnr........Thumbs Up  Who knows rdgrnr...maybe the judge got a cut of it.....hmmm...