Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 10, 2016, 3:19 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Canada couple loses out on $1.64M jackpot

Topic closed. 31 replies. Last post 5 years ago by haymaker.

Page 3 of 3
rdgrnr's avatar - walt
Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
United States
Member #73904
April 28, 2009
14903 Posts
Posted: July 18, 2011, 2:59 am - IP Logged

Methinks he doth protest too much (about lottery pools).







"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                            --Edmund Burke



    haymaker's avatar - Lottery-012.jpg
    Egg Harbor twp.south Jersey shore
    United States
    Member #112968
    June 29, 2011
    3856 Posts
    Posted: July 19, 2011, 9:15 pm - IP Logged

    It was nice but certainly not necessary for the guy who gave them $100,000 to do that. I wonder if that decision was made after a few court

    dates or when the guy got his check. I only say that because I'm just wondering about the level of entitlement the couple felt and how many of

    the other players they approached with the same plan and at what point.

    Obviously they filed the suit but really, deep down, I wonder if they ever felt that since they didn't play or pay that day they weren't honestly entitled

    to a split of the pot? And after receiving $100,000 I guess the sense of entitlement or assumption to split grew out of control...if one did, maybe more


    I don't know why people think that if they are a contributing member one week $$$ that they still are a contributing member the next $0.00

    The 'I'll cover for you' doesn't quite cut it after awhile and with most people doesn't ever cut it when it's time to collect a few hundred thousand

    dollars or more.

    I Agree!  also i wonder did the ppl. that "gave" the $100,000 have to pay a gift tax ?

    Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Crowds    -- Charles Mackay  LL.D.