Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 7:09 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Jury: Lottery winner must pay ex-boyfriend part of winnings

Topic closed. 38 replies. Last post 10 months ago by HaveABall.

Page 3 of 3
51
PrintE-mailLink
OneTrickpony's avatar - thought

United States
Member #167657
July 25, 2015
70 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 6, 2016, 8:03 pm - IP Logged

Lots of sour grapes here now that the gender roles are reversed.  Edit: I see the man being called a mooch by a lot of people,  what were the woman that sued  like this then?

Gold Digger:  See Kanye West, 2005.  LOL!

    Avatar
    Portland, OR
    United States
    Member #145973
    August 20, 2013
    226 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: February 7, 2016, 8:50 pm - IP Logged

    Don't kill yourself trying to figure out this one.  I'm sure there is more to this story.  I'm sure there are more juicy details that made this judgement fair.

    "Understand... people are more complicated than the masks they wear in society... everyone is playing to win, and some people will use moral justifications to advance their side"

                                                                                                                                                              Robert Greene

      Avatar
      New Member
      Suisun City,CA
      United States
      Member #97284
      September 14, 2010
      3 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 7, 2016, 11:25 pm - IP Logged

      California also has this same type of law, so for the past 10 years, when someone says, Hey,if you win you'er gonna split it with me right, I always say NO. and I say No to everyone, just so it gets out there, oh yeah, he always says No, they can call me greedy or whatever, I have won small jackpots and people know my position. Also, I dont tell anyone except my wife when I win small jackpots, found out the hard way, money makes people go crazy. I wish you all good luck in the lottery.

        ekem6078's avatar - winter
        TN
        United States
        Member #88776
        March 23, 2010
        2204 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: February 8, 2016, 8:15 am - IP Logged

        If they did'nt have it in writing it's VOID in my book.  "She said, we'll spilt if one of us hit it big"  That wouldn't fly with me.  If I was on the juior, I'll tell the moocher to go get him a JOB.

          cbr$'s avatar - maren
          Cordova,Al.
          United States
          Member #104482
          January 15, 2011
          4873 Posts
          Online
          Posted: February 8, 2016, 1:15 pm - IP Logged

          A jury Thursday ruled that a former middle school teacher who won a $1 million lottery jackpot must pay $291,000 to her former sweetheart, who testified that he handed her the money to buy the winning ticket.

          Lynn Poirier, 62, claimed the prize in 2007. Her live-in boyfriend, Howard Browning, 62, sued her a few months later, claiming they had a long-standing agreement: If one of them won a major lottery prize, they'd split it 50-50.

          But Poirier gave jurors a very different version of events. She said there was no agreement and that four years earlier she broke off their romance and moved out.

          "I told him that if I was married to him I'd divorce him. I told him I didn't want him around me," she said.

          (See Florida lottery winner back in court for retrial, Lottery Post, Feb. 2, 2016.)

          Jurors deliberated three and a half hours Thursday before returning their verdict. They ruled that the couple had a binding contract and that Poirier breached it.

          They ordered her to pay $291,000.

          It's not clear how they came to that total.

          "It should have been a lot more," said Browning, who works on a landscaping crew.

          "Right now I'm going to maybe take a couple of days off and relax. There's been lots of tension going on here," he said.

          Poirier left the Seminole County Courthouse without comment.

          Browning is entitled to substantially more money than $291,000, according to his attorney, Sean Sheppard, because he's due eight years of interest. That would likely add more than $100,000 to the judgment.

          On Monday Browning told jurors that June 2, 2007, they were at an Oviedo convenience store, that he handed her $20 to buy the $1 million Florida Lottery raffle ticket and that she handed the money to the clerk.

          But Poirier said she was alone, that she had stopped for fuel, bought the ticket then by chance bumped into Browning as she headed back to her car.

          "Never under any condition, any place, anywhere did I say I would split lottery winnings with Howard Browning," she told jurors.

          The two fell in love in 1991. She hired him to make improvements to her Geneva farmhouse then let him move in and live rent free. She had him evicted in 2009, two years after she won the jackpot and one year after he sued her, demanding half of her winnings.

          Sheppard told jurors that Poirier was the one who suggested in 1992 that they share any future jackpots. She also raised the issue again in 1993, the last time they discussed it, Sheppard said.

          Poirier's attorney, Mark Sessums, said the couple may have had an agreement in the early 1990s but their relationship had changed dramatically over the years.

          Their romance ended in 2003, Poirier said, a claim Browning said was untrue.

          Although Browning continued to live in the farmhouse, she moved a short distance away to her mother's house on Lake Pickett Road, she said.

          Sessums said when she won the jackpot, Poirier was engaged to marry a bail bondsman in Arkansas and Browning had started a romance with a local 7-Eleven clerk.

          Browning described his relationship with that woman as a close friendship. He told jurors he saw Poirier's engagement ring but insisted that that did not stop her from having sex with him.

          At the time of the lottery drawing, he said, they were still sweethearts.

          "She was definitely lying on the stand.... Lynn and I lived there all that time," Browning said.

          Sheppard showed jurors Poirier's concealed weapons permit, which she applied for in April 2007. The address listed on it: the Geneva farmhouse.

          The same address appeared on a 2007 tax form sent to Poirier by the state of Florida, documenting her lottery winnings.

          At the time of the jackpot, Poirier, who has a doctorate degree, worked as a special education teacher at South Seminole Middle School and Browning, a high school dropout, was an out-of-work mechanic. She has since retired.

          These jurors take a vote in the first 15 minute say she should pay him. Used the 3 hours & 15 minute hashing out how much. Well he don't sound like the type who know how to keep it, so we can expected him to be in the market for another easy prey female to take of him. He is a user!

            pickone4me's avatar - 021414tvlies zpsa453b327.jpg
            Wisconsin
            United States
            Member #104962
            January 23, 2011
            1075 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: February 8, 2016, 4:44 pm - IP Logged

            These jurors take a vote in the first 15 minute say she should pay him. Used the 3 hours & 15 minute hashing out how much. Well he don't sound like the type who know how to keep it, so we can expected him to be in the market for another easy prey female to take of him. He is a user!

            "He is a user"  So it is ok for the "female" to do it, but not the male, got it.  So much for that  "equality" women are always complaining about, the outcome of this case is what equality is all about.

            Trump 2016!

              Avatar
              NY
              United States
              Member #23835
              October 16, 2005
              3474 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: February 8, 2016, 11:53 pm - IP Logged

              "He is a user"  So it is ok for the "female" to do it, but not the male, got it.  So much for that  "equality" women are always complaining about, the outcome of this case is what equality is all about.

              The majority of posts here are based on the almost complete ignorance the posters have as a result of reading this one article. It's possible that the jurors got it wrong, but they made their decision based on far more knowledge than the posters whining about the decision.

                CARBOB's avatar - FL LOTTERY_LOGO.png
                ORLANDO, FLORIDA
                United States
                Member #4924
                June 3, 2004
                5893 Posts
                Online
                Posted: February 9, 2016, 8:43 am - IP Logged

                If they did'nt have it in writing it's VOID in my book.  "She said, we'll spilt if one of us hit it big"  That wouldn't fly with me.  If I was on the juior, I'll tell the moocher to go get him a JOB.

                Are you implying that your word means nothing? How old are you? Do you realize, many deals were done with handshakes. Many years ago, when there was more honesty, in this world.

                  HaveABall's avatar - rocket

                  United States
                  Member #72448
                  March 18, 2009
                  1227 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: February 9, 2016, 6:14 pm - IP Logged

                  I didn't know why the former middle middle school teacher had to pay up $291,000 to her former sweetheart.

                  I can certainly see your point of view, ressuccess.  Because this judgement amount indicates that this boyfriend [whom she longggg enabled as a moocher and essentially non-sharer] received more money (tax free) than she did; after she already paid all of the taxes on it.

                  Ah, well ... perhaps this was another win that the lottery gods planned knowing full well what would happen and deeming it would be uniquely entertaining to observe.

                  White Bounce

                  Having several millions of dollars in my financial accounts means receiving several valuable services each day!

                  Disney