Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 17, 2017, 7:50 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

British Columbia Lottery taking bets on US election

6167 replies. Last post 6 hours ago by JAMORA.

Page 275 of 412
4.117
PrintE-mailLink
Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
Upstate NY
United States
Member #174656
May 5, 2016
837 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:00 am - IP Logged

The Voter-ID Myth Crashes

Voting is a semi-sacred act of civic religion. Trust that only those eligible are determining our future as a nation is the foundation of civic peace. Voter-ID laws should be just one part of ensuring voter integrity. When Democrats resist those measures, it only feeds suspicion that they’re trying to steal elections.

"Trying"???  They have and still do.

Voter I.D. chart

If you don't know there's a huge difference between having a college I.D. - which can be created by some clever kid with a good printer - or a gun license - which requires an extensive background check - then you're too stupid and shouldn't be allowed to vote. 

NO ONE is "disenfranchised" due to Voter I.D. laws. At the very least, it weeds out those too lazy or stupid to get one.

IOW, your average Democrat voter.

Again, it's not bad to require it IF the government goes out and provides the necessary identification in order to vote at no expense or very low expense. And no, college ID's are FAR more advanced than you can ever imagine. . Never applied for a gun license so, unlike you, i will not claim that i have any idea as to how good it is, but if you can't see the clear as daylight disenfranchisement going on then i have no words to describe your ignorance. 

Your own link says it clearly "Voter-ID laws will not prevent non-citizens from voting. Green-card holders and even illegal aliens get driver’s licenses". Your own link says the truth. 


    Avatar
    Kentucky
    United States
    Member #32652
    February 14, 2006
    7341 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:03 am - IP Logged

    Coin Toss- you a smart guy, look at what Senator Johnson said- he wanted specific wording on " it was a terrorist attack or whatever" her point was 4 Americans had already been killed- whether by guys taking a stroll & deciding let's go kill folks or just an assault.. Her shouting was because Johnson was acting like a dumb** which he was.Point being if someone was shot on the Los Vegas strip- what difference would it make if it was a drive by shooting or someone coming close up to the victim? ..they were killed.

    Come on Man.

    What difference does it make showing the facts when they will believe whatever they want? It made no difference to Rep. Jason Chaffetz that James Comey never said the FBI was reopening the Clinton case.

      Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
      Upstate NY
      United States
      Member #174656
      May 5, 2016
      837 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:08 am - IP Logged

      What difference does it make showing the facts when they will believe whatever they want? It made no difference to Rep. Jason Chaffetz that James Comey never said the FBI was reopening the Clinton case.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/26/gop-rep-jason-chaffetz-says-his-conscience-wont-let-him-support-donald-trump-just-vote-for-him/

      How Chaffetz hasn't been laughed out of congress yet speaks to how insular and unprincipled the small tent party has become.

        noise-gate's avatar - images q=tbn:ANd9GcR91HDs4UJhjxO7cmeMQWZ5lB_FOcMLOGicau4V74R45tDgPWrr
        Bay Area - California
        United States
        Member #136477
        December 12, 2012
        4144 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:23 am - IP Logged

        What difference does it make showing the facts when they will believe whatever they want? It made no difference to Rep. Jason Chaffetz that James Comey never said the FBI was reopening the Clinton case.

        l heard it said Stack that Jason has " promised" his district that he will open one hearing after another on Clinton if she becomes President.If his district is foolish enough to send him back to Washington based on that alone, they just as clueless as he is.This vengeful action all started with Gingrich.Finally his own party kicked his sorry A** to the curb. Another sack of liquid crap is that Texan Sid " Vicious" Miller.Calling Hillary the C-word.Then he tried blaming it on someone hacking into his twitter account. Nice try Sid- you got found out.

        People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it- George Bernard Shaw.

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7341 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:30 am - IP Logged

          (CNN)Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are neck-and-neck in a new national tracking poll out Tuesday morning.

          The latest ABC News/The Washington Post offering showed Trump barely edging Clinton among likely voters, 46%-45%, well within the poll's 3 percentage point margin of error.
          How about that!!!

          It takes 270 to win and Al Gore got 266 in 2000 so the question can Trump win the same states as Bush or will Clinton win one or two states that voted for Bush. Gore won Iowa's 7 votes, but Trump is currently leading there. The thing is, Bush won Virginia, Colorado, and New Hampshire where currently Clinton has substantial leads.

          It's simple math, Clinton has 272 Electoral votes in Democrat likely states so even if Trump wins all the leaning Democrat states and all the battle ground states, he can't win. Can you show me one poll where Trump is leading in any likely Democrat state and/or leading in Virginia, Colorado, or New Hampshire?

            Avatar
            Kentucky
            United States
            Member #32652
            February 14, 2006
            7341 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:34 am - IP Logged

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/26/gop-rep-jason-chaffetz-says-his-conscience-wont-let-him-support-donald-trump-just-vote-for-him/

            How Chaffetz hasn't been laughed out of congress yet speaks to how insular and unprincipled the small tent party has become.

            When the smoke clears it will be Tea Party, regular, and Trump Republicans and if they somehow manage to retain the House, they will lose it in 2018.

              Avatar
              Kentucky
              United States
              Member #32652
              February 14, 2006
              7341 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:43 am - IP Logged

              l heard it said Stack that Jason has " promised" his district that he will open one hearing after another on Clinton if she becomes President.If his district is foolish enough to send him back to Washington based on that alone, they just as clueless as he is.This vengeful action all started with Gingrich.Finally his own party kicked his sorry A** to the curb. Another sack of liquid crap is that Texan Sid " Vicious" Miller.Calling Hillary the C-word.Then he tried blaming it on someone hacking into his twitter account. Nice try Sid- you got found out.

              For some reason the anti-Clinton crowd here has ignored the Senate races and the adverse Trump effect. The current polls show the Democrats solidly leading in enough states where they will have at least 52 Senate seats and the majority.

                RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                United States
                Member #59354
                March 13, 2008
                4054 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 2, 2016, 1:01 am - IP Logged

                I expect the polls to widen, when Trump goes high, Hilda goes low.

                RL

                Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                  US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                  grwurston's avatar - 144
                  Let's Go Rangers!!!
                  bel air maryland
                  United States
                  Member #90251
                  April 24, 2010
                  5093 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 2, 2016, 1:17 am - IP Logged

                  It takes 270 to win and Al Gore got 266 in 2000 so the question can Trump win the same states as Bush or will Clinton win one or two states that voted for Bush. Gore won Iowa's 7 votes, but Trump is currently leading there. The thing is, Bush won Virginia, Colorado, and New Hampshire where currently Clinton has substantial leads.

                  It's simple math, Clinton has 272 Electoral votes in Democrat likely states so even if Trump wins all the leaning Democrat states and all the battle ground states, he can't win. Can you show me one poll where Trump is leading in any likely Democrat state and/or leading in Virginia, Colorado, or New Hampshire?

                  Here you go.

                  https://youtu.be/zaOoFH8HHrk

                  "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra, Hall of Fame baseball player.

                  The numbers will tell you what numbers to play. Pay attention to the numbers.

                  Don't just think outside the box, crush it.

                    Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
                    Upstate NY
                    United States
                    Member #174656
                    May 5, 2016
                    837 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 2, 2016, 2:09 am - IP Logged

                    It takes 270 to win and Al Gore got 266 in 2000 so the question can Trump win the same states as Bush or will Clinton win one or two states that voted for Bush. Gore won Iowa's 7 votes, but Trump is currently leading there. The thing is, Bush won Virginia, Colorado, and New Hampshire where currently Clinton has substantial leads.

                    It's simple math, Clinton has 272 Electoral votes in Democrat likely states so even if Trump wins all the leaning Democrat states and all the battle ground states, he can't win. Can you show me one poll where Trump is leading in any likely Democrat state and/or leading in Virginia, Colorado, or New Hampshire?

                    http://www.providencejournal.com/news/20160907/emerson-poll-finds-clintons-lead-over-trump-precariously-thin-in-ri

                    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/co/colorado_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5974.html#polls

                    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-6022.html#polls

                    Now is not the time to be overconfident. The elites decided that Trump was so terrible that they could put up their worst candidate and still win. I agree that Hillary will probably win them, but the fact that these states aren't +40 speaks volumes on how terrible the elites miscalculated at the worst possile time.

                      mikeintexas's avatar - tx avatar-1.gif
                      Texas Panhandle
                      United States
                      Member #136843
                      December 20, 2012
                      1356 Posts
                      Online
                      Posted: November 2, 2016, 3:39 am - IP Logged

                      Again, it's not bad to require it IF the government goes out and provides the necessary identification in order to vote at no expense or very low expense. And no, college ID's are FAR more advanced than you can ever imagine. . Never applied for a gun license so, unlike you, i will not claim that i have any idea as to how good it is, but if you can't see the clear as daylight disenfranchisement going on then i have no words to describe your ignorance. 

                      Your own link says it clearly "Voter-ID laws will not prevent non-citizens from voting. Green-card holders and even illegal aliens get driver’s licenses". Your own link says the truth. 


                      If you're a resident of Texas, you can get a free Voter I.D.  You just have to make the effort to go get one...and provide proof that you are who you say you are.

                      And yes, anybody with any graphics skill can create a college I.D.   They're not any more "advanced" than the limited intellect needed to get a degree these days. You're living proof of that. 

                      You're the ignorant one if you think that hundreds of thousands will be disenfranchised by actually having to prove they are who they say they are and are, in fact, eligible to vote.  The only people who want people to be able to vote w/out having to show a valid I.D. are those who want to cheat.   You know, the crooks, the thieves, the liars... the Dems and Socialists, all the Constitution-hating rat-b*st*rds.

                      "You're the ignorant one if...." I take that back.  There's no "if" to it.  You're ignorant and a liar.  Every time you post you show your abject ignorance and lack of veracity.

                      Oh, and you're being your usual duplicitous self by leaving out the rest of the paragraph:

                      Voter-ID laws will not prevent non-citizens from voting. Green-card holders and even illegal aliens get driver’s licenses. But that’s not an argument against voter ID. It’s an argument for issuing driver’s licenses that specify non-citizenship.

                      (see? I can make big letters, too!)

                      Game, set, match - ME! I destroyed your argument yet once again.  Wanna give up or are you hungry for more?

                      A people that elect corrupt politicians, impostors, thieves and traitors are not victims...but accomplices.
                       - George Orwell

                        dr65's avatar - black panther.jpg
                        Pennsylvania
                        United States
                        Member #74096
                        May 2, 2009
                        23218 Posts
                        Online
                        Posted: November 2, 2016, 7:09 am - IP Logged

                        Who cares about who follows who on FAKEBOOK...take it with a grain of salt. 

                        Afterall, when you apologize you're good as new right? Or does that depend on who it's coming from?

                        In Trump's case, no apology is good enough but I'll tell you what...his apologies are more genuine and

                        fall within the definition of one. Hillary's apologies are - well, if I have to but let me get it out quick and

                        make it not seem like I did anything wrong then say later time after time after time, I apologized. Yeah,

                        right.

                          dr65's avatar - black panther.jpg
                          Pennsylvania
                          United States
                          Member #74096
                          May 2, 2009
                          23218 Posts
                          Online
                          Posted: November 2, 2016, 11:36 am - IP Logged

                          Hillary, give it up. She's as much smear campaign as anyone else. Let's take Hillary's outburst about

                          fossil fuels and use it as a temper gauge...

                          http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/274848-clinton-gets-in-heated-exchange-with-environmental-activist 

                          She's a nasty witch. Imagine the yelling and nasty, clenched teeth and fists when she doesn't get her way in the WH..

                          her secret service people know how she is and you can see it on her face too, she's an ugly, old, miserable, angry witch.

                          She wants to constantly remind people of how anti-woman Trump is...that's a joke. I'm am so sick of Hillary bringing up

                          the morally deficient Machado as a campaign tool. Maybe she can be her new aide since Huma is on the hot seat.

                          These women will fade into the background if Hillary is elected, the only reason they matter now is for their vote and

                          other weak women's votes who believe what Hillary tells them. Just live your life, don't fall for someone who is out there

                          to make you weak and hang on an issue that just drags you down. Emphasis on women's issues is Hillary's tool to make

                          women think they need more. I see enough high profile women out there, enough successful women and women who

                          are strong in their own right.

                            noise-gate's avatar - images q=tbn:ANd9GcR91HDs4UJhjxO7cmeMQWZ5lB_FOcMLOGicau4V74R45tDgPWrr
                            Bay Area - California
                            United States
                            Member #136477
                            December 12, 2012
                            4144 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 2, 2016, 12:59 pm - IP Logged

                            She may be ugly old & miserable but people are not looking for that this time around. If people were voting for beauty,  youth & being constantly upbeat- that's not Trump either. His old, ugly & miserable,  that's why they not voting for him.His only draw is entertainment & having not so deep pockets. Don't believe ?- just watch. Let's see who of the two uglies come out ahead next week. Big Smile

                            People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it- George Bernard Shaw.

                              Avatar
                              Kentucky
                              United States
                              Member #32652
                              February 14, 2006
                              7341 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 2, 2016, 1:11 pm - IP Logged

                              LMAO!Yep, you got me, I didn't say "reputable" pool.

                              Do you think those videos will convince lots of the Trump supporters to bet everything they have on him winning the election?

                                 
                                Page 275 of 412