Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 5, 2016, 7:43 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

British Columbia Lottery taking bets on US election

5352 replies. Last post 2 minutes ago by Artist77.

Page 342 of 357
3.918
PrintE-mailLink
Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
Zeta Reticuli Star System
United States
Member #30470
January 17, 2006
10348 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 26, 2016, 11:41 pm - IP Logged

The democrats are saying Hillary has a 2 million popular vote lead while at the same time it's being reported that a suspect 2 million illegal aliens voted. 

They're exposing themselves.

Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.

Lep

There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.

    Avatar
    Kentucky
    United States
    Member #32652
    February 14, 2006
    7302 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 27, 2016, 12:02 am - IP Logged

    There's no evidence of voter fraud or computer hacking, the dem's are just grasping at straws.  They see the Supreme Court slipping away and will stop at nothing to prevent that.

    "There's no evidence of voter fraud or computer hacking,"

    They didn't need evidence; just the money to pay for the recount.

    "the dem's are just grasping at straws."

    I can see why Artist called you a "moron". Jill Stein and the Green Party are paying for the recounts and Gary Johnson will be monitoring them too.

      Avatar
      Kentucky
      United States
      Member #32652
      February 14, 2006
      7302 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 27, 2016, 12:09 am - IP Logged

      This thread might very well get another 5,000 comments and another 222,000 views on this  topic alone.

      Maybe if they actually find voter fraud in all three states, but I don't see that happening. Has Stein ever gave a logical reason for asking recounts other that she could?

        LiveInGreenBay's avatar - driver
        Green Bay
        United States
        Member #169391
        October 15, 2015
        1244 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 27, 2016, 6:46 am - IP Logged

        "There's no evidence of voter fraud or computer hacking,"

        They didn't need evidence; just the money to pay for the recount.

        "the dem's are just grasping at straws."

        I can see why Artist called you a "moron". Jill Stein and the Green Party are paying for the recounts and Gary Johnson will be monitoring them too.

        Hey genius, Jill Stein isn't paying for that recount.  Think again, if you can.

        Never give up.  Banana

          mikeintexas's avatar - tx avatar-1.gif
          Texas Panhandle
          United States
          Member #136843
          December 20, 2012
          1270 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 27, 2016, 9:38 am - IP Logged

          Breaking news! Donald Trump just announced that one of his first executive orders as President will be to ban shredded cheese.

          He wants to make America grate again.

            sully16's avatar - sharan
            Ringleader
            Michigan
            United States
            Member #81740
            October 28, 2009
            40377 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 27, 2016, 3:55 pm - IP Logged

            Hey genius, Jill Stein isn't paying for that recount.  Think again, if you can.

            Hillary already conceded, done deal.

            Did you exchange a walk on part in the war ?

            For a lead role in a cage?

             

                                                        From Pink Floyd's " Wish you were here"

              LottoAce's avatar - WWI Flying_Ace.gif
              N.C.
              United States
              Member #56005
              October 28, 2007
              830 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 27, 2016, 6:35 pm - IP Logged

              This is a cool video on the election...

              My favorite part was when Ann Coulter gave her honest educated opinion. did you see the look
              on the one womans face,  when she stated she believed "Donald Trump" had the best chance
              of becoming president. the entire audience was laughing.


              Jewel even cracked on her at the Rob Lowe Roast.

              I wonder if Jewel and her liberal minded screwballs
              can appreciate a quote from a real musician.
              How Do You Like Me Now?!!

              "know your limitations, but excede your expectations"

                Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
                Zeta Reticuli Star System
                United States
                Member #30470
                January 17, 2006
                10348 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 27, 2016, 6:54 pm - IP Logged

                Go ahead, liberals, dems and greenies. Keep demanding recounts and Trump will nail Hillary on criminal charges. 

                Bring it on morons.

                 She's not going to outwit Trump.

                Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.

                Lep

                There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.

                  LottoAce's avatar - WWI Flying_Ace.gif
                  N.C.
                  United States
                  Member #56005
                  October 28, 2007
                  830 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 27, 2016, 6:56 pm - IP Logged

                  Go ahead, liberals, dems and greenies. Keep demanding recounts and Trump will nail Hillary on criminal charges. 

                  Bring it on morons.

                   She's not going to outwit Trump.

                  Go ahead, liberals, dems and greenies. Keep demanding recounts and Trump will nail Hillary on criminal charges

                  you realize one, has absolutely nothing to do with the other...right?

                  "know your limitations, but excede your expectations"

                    Artist77's avatar - batman14

                    United States
                    Member #121745
                    January 16, 2012
                    4788 Posts
                    Online
                    Posted: November 27, 2016, 7:25 pm - IP Logged

                    Go ahead, liberals, dems and greenies. Keep demanding recounts and Trump will nail Hillary on criminal charges

                    you realize one, has absolutely nothing to do with the other...right?

                    Well, actually one could tie the two together legal strategy wise. Trump could decide to go after HRC for her violations of law and say her current attempts show that she does not view herself as being bound by legal processes. It would show a pattern and would be useful. Trump is holding onto the email issue as a bargaining chip.

                    J'aime La France.

                      LottoAce's avatar - WWI Flying_Ace.gif
                      N.C.
                      United States
                      Member #56005
                      October 28, 2007
                      830 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 27, 2016, 7:57 pm - IP Logged

                      Well, actually one could tie the two together legal strategy wise. Trump could decide to go after HRC for her violations of law and say her current attempts show that she does not view herself as being bound by legal processes. It would show a pattern and would be useful. Trump is holding onto the email issue as a bargaining chip.

                      depends on how much evidence they can muster up to tie the two together. problem is...
                      there is no proof that HRC had anything to do with voter fraud. if she was going to rig
                      the election to win. she would have bought off the electorial votes. not the popular vote.

                      any investigation/trial would be a complete waste of time, and tax payers
                      money. just like Ken Star and whitewater.

                      in any case, even if Trump was to actually prosecute her. do you honestly
                      believe that they would put a person of her stature in general population?
                      I don't believe so...
                      just say. IMHO.

                      "know your limitations, but excede your expectations"

                        LiveInGreenBay's avatar - driver
                        Green Bay
                        United States
                        Member #169391
                        October 15, 2015
                        1244 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 27, 2016, 8:06 pm - IP Logged

                        Trump won Wisconsin by 27,506 votes.  Good luck turning that into a Hillary win.  LOL!

                        http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/jill-stein-files-recount-wisconsin-trump-won-27506-votes/

                        Never give up.  Banana

                          LiveInGreenBay's avatar - driver
                          Green Bay
                          United States
                          Member #169391
                          October 15, 2015
                          1244 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 27, 2016, 8:15 pm - IP Logged

                          Here's the dirty stinking democrat strategy...  "The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.  If all three states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270".

                          http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_democrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html

                          Never give up.  Banana

                            Avatar
                            Kentucky
                            United States
                            Member #32652
                            February 14, 2006
                            7302 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 27, 2016, 8:48 pm - IP Logged

                            Hey genius, Jill Stein isn't paying for that recount.  Think again, if you can.

                            Any one of the Presidential candidates on the Wisconsin, Michigan, and PA state ballot can legally ask for a recount. By whom or how it's paid is irrelevant.

                            "the dem's are just grasping at straws."

                            That made no sense when you posted it and still doesn't unless you're confused or ignorant of Stein's political party.

                              LiveInGreenBay's avatar - driver
                              Green Bay
                              United States
                              Member #169391
                              October 15, 2015
                              1244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 27, 2016, 8:50 pm - IP Logged

                              Any one of the Presidential candidates on the Wisconsin, Michigan, and PA state ballot can legally ask for a recount. By whom or how it's paid is irrelevant.

                              "the dem's are just grasping at straws."

                              That made no sense when you posted it and still doesn't unless you're confused or ignorant of Stein's political party.

                              Stein's political party?  LOL!  All ten of them?  I could care less.

                              Never give up.  Banana

                                 
                                Page 342 of 357